Elsevier manuscript

2006-08-24 Thread gluvizotto
Hi, first of all, sorry if it is a stupid question. I'm new in the lyx business. Actually, I stared last week! I'm writing a manuscript that I want to submit to elsevier. I'm using the elsart template, but I'm having problems with the authors field. It seems that I can enter only one, which is

Re: Elsevier manuscript

2006-08-24 Thread Ingo Klöcker
Am Donnerstag, 24. August 2006 15:21 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, first of all, sorry if it is a stupid question. I'm new in the lyx business. Actually, I stared last week! I'm writing a manuscript that I want to submit to elsevier. I'm using the elsart template, but I'm having

Elsevier manuscript

2006-08-24 Thread gluvizotto
Hi, first of all, sorry if it is a stupid question. I'm new in the lyx business. Actually, I stared last week! I'm writing a manuscript that I want to submit to elsevier. I'm using the elsart template, but I'm having problems with the authors field. It seems that I can enter only one, which is

Re: Elsevier manuscript

2006-08-24 Thread Ingo Klöcker
Am Donnerstag, 24. August 2006 15:21 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, first of all, sorry if it is a stupid question. I'm new in the lyx business. Actually, I stared last week! I'm writing a manuscript that I want to submit to elsevier. I'm using the elsart template, but I'm having

Elsevier manuscript

2006-08-24 Thread gluvizotto
Hi, first of all, sorry if it is a stupid question. I'm new in the lyx business. Actually, I stared last week! I'm writing a manuscript that I want to submit to elsevier. I'm using the elsart template, but I'm having problems with the authors field. It seems that I can enter only one, which is

Re: Elsevier manuscript

2006-08-24 Thread Ingo Klöcker
Am Donnerstag, 24. August 2006 15:21 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Hi, > first of all, sorry if it is a stupid question. > I'm new in the lyx business. Actually, I stared last > week! > I'm writing a manuscript that I want to submit to > elsevier. I'm using the elsart template, but I'm > having