On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> So it's true: great minds think alike!
Indeed, I played with negative spaces previously but didn't get anything
useful. I was hoping there might be a more elegant, e.g., preamble-only,
approach to redefine spacings
On 04/06/2017 10:23 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Joel Kulesza wrote:
A minor complaint (and why I didn't go this route originally), the
vertical spacing before/after the second equation is not consistent
because of going between "standard" and "itemize". It's subtle, but is
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Joel Kulesza wrote:
A minor complaint (and why I didn't go this route originally), the
vertical spacing before/after the second equation is not consistent
because of going between "standard" and "itemize". It's subtle, but is
there a known fix?
Joel,
What I would do is
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> I don't know if there's a module for this, but it's not hard to do. The
> first key is that you'll want the display mode math in a Standard, rather
> then Itemize (or Enumerate), environment to get it to center properly.
On 04/05/2017 04:20 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote:
Colleagues:
My goal is to have equations on a Beamer frame center-aligned relative
to the frame and not the indent level of the current environment.
This issue is surprisingly hard to search for (e.g., most discussion
addresses equation alignment
Colleagues:
My goal is to have equations on a Beamer frame center-aligned relative to
the frame and not the indent level of the current environment.
This issue is surprisingly hard to search for (e.g., most discussion
addresses equation alignment with things such as \align). One approach I