On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:57:22PM +, Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be
different in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same. Where
am I wrong?
Do you mean the Qt frontend?
You have to run ./configure --with-frontend=qt if
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 22:35, Angus Leeming wrote:
Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be different
in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same.
Where am I wrong?
LyX now comes with a choice of frontends:
* the one you are used
Raphael Clifford wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 22:35, Angus Leeming wrote:
Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be different
in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same.
Where am I wrong?
LyX now comes with a choice of
Raphael Clifford wrote:
Just FYI mandrake started removing all headers etc. from it's
standard packages and putting them in -devel. It's very
annoying ...
However IMHO it is The Right Thing(TM) -- just users who do not
want to compile everything in the world should not be bothered
with .h
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 16:46, Matej Cepl wrote:
Raphael Clifford wrote:
Just FYI mandrake started removing all headers etc. from it's
standard packages and putting them in -devel. It's very
annoying ...
However IMHO it is The Right Thing(TM) -- just users who do not
want to compile
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:57:22PM +, Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be
different in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same. Where
am I wrong?
Do you mean the Qt frontend?
You have to run
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:57:22PM +, Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be
different in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same. Where
am I wrong?
Do you mean the Qt frontend?
You have to run ./configure --with-frontend=qt if
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 22:35, Angus Leeming wrote:
Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be different
in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same.
Where am I wrong?
LyX now comes with a choice of frontends:
* the one you are used
Raphael Clifford wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 22:35, Angus Leeming wrote:
Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be different
in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same.
Where am I wrong?
LyX now comes with a choice of
Raphael Clifford wrote:
Just FYI mandrake started removing all headers etc. from it's
standard packages and putting them in -devel. It's very
annoying ...
However IMHO it is The Right Thing(TM) -- just users who do not
want to compile everything in the world should not be bothered
with .h
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 16:46, Matej Cepl wrote:
Raphael Clifford wrote:
Just FYI mandrake started removing all headers etc. from it's
standard packages and putting them in -devel. It's very
annoying ...
However IMHO it is The Right Thing(TM) -- just users who do not
want to compile
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:57:22PM +, Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be
different in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same. Where
am I wrong?
Do you mean the Qt frontend?
You have to run
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:57:22PM +, Antonio Sousa wrote:
> One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be
> different in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same. Where
> am I wrong?
Do you mean the Qt frontend?
You have to run ./configure --with-frontend=qt
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 22:35, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Antonio Sousa wrote:
>
> > One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be different
> > in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same.
> > Where am I wrong?
>
> LyX now comes with a choice of frontends:
> * the one
Raphael Clifford wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 22:35, Angus Leeming wrote:
Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be different
in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same.
Where am I wrong?
LyX now comes with a choice of
Raphael Clifford wrote:
> Just FYI mandrake started removing all headers etc. from it's
> standard packages and putting them in -devel. It's very
> annoying ...
However IMHO it is The Right Thing(TM) -- just users who do not
want to compile everything in the world should not be bothered
with .h
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 16:46, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Raphael Clifford wrote:
> > Just FYI mandrake started removing all headers etc. from it's
> > standard packages and putting them in -devel. It's very
> > annoying ...
>
> However IMHO it is The Right Thing(TM) -- just users who do not
> want to
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:57:22PM +, Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be
different in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same. Where
am I wrong?
Do you mean the Qt frontend?
You have to run
Sorry for disturning again, but I'm not still able to install the Lyx 1.3.
Neither with the tarball nor with the src i can finalize the installation.
And i've noticed that the system says that cannot find the libxpm or libpm and
forms.h, and that I must install the forms library.
But i have
Antonio Sousa wrote:
Sorry for disturning again, but I'm not still able to install the Lyx 1.3.
Neither with the tarball nor with the src i can finalize the installation.
And i've noticed that the system says that cannot find the libxpm or libpm and
Install a package called libxpm or
Em Segunda, 3 de Fevereiro de 2003 19:28, Michael Abshoff escreveu:
Antonio Sousa wrote:
Sorry for disturning again, but I'm not still able to install the Lyx 1.3.
Neither with the tarball nor with the src i can finalize the installation.
And i've noticed that the system says that cannot find
Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be different
in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same.
Where am I wrong?
LyX now comes with a choice of frontends:
* the one you are used to which uses the xforms library.
* a new one which uses
Sorry for disturning again, but I'm not still able to install the Lyx 1.3.
Neither with the tarball nor with the src i can finalize the installation.
And i've noticed that the system says that cannot find the libxpm or libpm and
forms.h, and that I must install the forms library.
But i have
Antonio Sousa wrote:
Sorry for disturning again, but I'm not still able to install the Lyx 1.3.
Neither with the tarball nor with the src i can finalize the installation.
And i've noticed that the system says that cannot find the libxpm or libpm and
Install a package called libxpm or
Em Segunda, 3 de Fevereiro de 2003 19:28, Michael Abshoff escreveu:
Antonio Sousa wrote:
Sorry for disturning again, but I'm not still able to install the Lyx 1.3.
Neither with the tarball nor with the src i can finalize the installation.
And i've noticed that the system says that cannot find
Antonio Sousa wrote:
One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be different
in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same.
Where am I wrong?
LyX now comes with a choice of frontends:
* the one you are used to which uses the xforms library.
* a new one which uses
Sorry for disturning again, but I'm not still able to install the Lyx 1.3.
Neither with the tarball nor with the src i can finalize the installation.
And i've noticed that the system says that cannot find the libxpm or libpm and
forms.h, and that I must install the forms library.
But i have
Antonio Sousa wrote:
Sorry for disturning again, but I'm not still able to install the Lyx 1.3.
Neither with the tarball nor with the src i can finalize the installation.
And i've noticed that the system says that cannot find the libxpm or libpm and
Install a package called libxpm or
Em Segunda, 3 de Fevereiro de 2003 19:28, Michael Abshoff escreveu:
> Antonio Sousa wrote:
> >Sorry for disturning again, but I'm not still able to install the Lyx 1.3.
> >Neither with the tarball nor with the src i can finalize the installation.
> >And i've noticed that the system says that
Antonio Sousa wrote:
> One more question. I supposed that with this new version will be different
> in it's graphical aspect. But everything seems the same.
> Where am I wrong?
LyX now comes with a choice of frontends:
* the one you are used to which uses the xforms library.
* a new one which
Antonio == Antonio Sousa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Antonio Hello all I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx
Antonio 1.3.0pre3, but the rpminstaller teels me thati need the
Antonio libstdc++-libc6.1.2.so.3. Well i'm using Mandrake 9.0, i have
Antonio all the xforms and compilers
On Friday 31 January 2003 00:25, Antonio Sousa wrote:
Hello all
I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx 1.3.0pre3, but the
rpminstaller teels me thati need the libstdc++-libc6.1.2.so.3.
Well i'm using Mandrake 9.0, i have all the xforms and compilers installed
and i don know where i
Em Sexta, 31 de Janeiro de 2003 16:30, Antonio Sousa escreveu:
Em Sexta, 31 de Janeiro de 2003 09:32, José Matos escreveu:
On Friday 31 January 2003 00:25, Antonio Sousa wrote:
Hello all
I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx 1.3.0pre3, but the
rpminstaller teels me thati
Antonio == Antonio Sousa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Antonio Hello all I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx
Antonio 1.3.0pre3, but the rpminstaller teels me thati need the
Antonio libstdc++-libc6.1.2.so.3. Well i'm using Mandrake 9.0, i have
Antonio all the xforms and compilers
On Friday 31 January 2003 00:25, Antonio Sousa wrote:
Hello all
I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx 1.3.0pre3, but the
rpminstaller teels me thati need the libstdc++-libc6.1.2.so.3.
Well i'm using Mandrake 9.0, i have all the xforms and compilers installed
and i don know where i
Em Sexta, 31 de Janeiro de 2003 16:30, Antonio Sousa escreveu:
Em Sexta, 31 de Janeiro de 2003 09:32, José Matos escreveu:
On Friday 31 January 2003 00:25, Antonio Sousa wrote:
Hello all
I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx 1.3.0pre3, but the
rpminstaller teels me thati
> "Antonio" == Antonio Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Antonio> Hello all I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx
Antonio> 1.3.0pre3, but the rpminstaller teels me thati need the
Antonio> libstdc++-libc6.1.2.so.3. Well i'm using Mandrake 9.0, i have
Antonio> all the xforms and
On Friday 31 January 2003 00:25, Antonio Sousa wrote:
> Hello all
> I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx 1.3.0pre3, but the
> rpminstaller teels me thati need the libstdc++-libc6.1.2.so.3.
> Well i'm using Mandrake 9.0, i have all the xforms and compilers installed
> and i don know
Em Sexta, 31 de Janeiro de 2003 16:30, Antonio Sousa escreveu:
> Em Sexta, 31 de Janeiro de 2003 09:32, José Matos escreveu:
> > On Friday 31 January 2003 00:25, Antonio Sousa wrote:
> > > Hello all
> > > I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx 1.3.0pre3, but the
> > > rpminstaller teels
Hello all
I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx 1.3.0pre3, but the
rpminstaller teels me thati need the libstdc++-libc6.1.2.so.3.
Well i'm using Mandrake 9.0, i have all the xforms and compilers installed and
i don know where i can find this library.
I'll apreciate very much a
Hello all
I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx 1.3.0pre3, but the
rpminstaller teels me thati need the libstdc++-libc6.1.2.so.3.
Well i'm using Mandrake 9.0, i have all the xforms and compilers installed and
i don know where i can find this library.
I'll apreciate very much a
Hello all
I need a little help.I'm trying to instal the lyx 1.3.0pre3, but the
rpminstaller teels me thati need the libstdc++-libc6.1.2.so.3.
Well i'm using Mandrake 9.0, i have all the xforms and compilers installed and
i don know where i can find this library.
I'll apreciate very much a
42 matches
Mail list logo
