Re: KLyX revival?

Allan Rae wrote: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/ where you'll see evidence of a kde-1.1.2 port in progress. It doesn't use the KLyX dialogs because KLyX didn't use a gui-designer. Allan. (ARRae) Regular Lyx runs just fine under KDE. Why is a port needed? -- John

Re: KLyX revival?

Allan Rae wrote: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/ where you'll see evidence of a kde-1.1.2 port in progress. It doesn't use the KLyX dialogs because KLyX didn't use a gui-designer. Allan. (ARRae) Regular Lyx runs just fine under KDE. Why is a port needed? -- John

Re: KLyX revival?

Allan Rae wrote: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/ > > where you'll see evidence of a kde-1.1.2 port in progress. It doesn't use > the KLyX dialogs because KLyX didn't use a gui-designer. > > Allan. (ARRae) Regular Lyx runs just fine under KDE. Why is a port needed? --

KLyX revival?

Are there any signs of it?

Re: KLyX revival?

On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Matej Cepl wrote: Are there any signs of it? Take a look at the reference to Matthias Ettrich's comments about KDE-2.0 and LyX in LyX Development News (That I just realised I haven't announced on the lists yet): http://www.lyx.org/news/2913.php3 and at:

KLyX revival?

Are there any signs of it?

Re: KLyX revival?

On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Matej Cepl wrote: Are there any signs of it? Take a look at the reference to Matthias Ettrich's comments about KDE-2.0 and LyX in LyX Development News (That I just realised I haven't announced on the lists yet): http://www.lyx.org/news/2913.php3 and at:

KLyX revival?

Are there any signs of it?

Re: KLyX revival?

On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Matej Cepl wrote: > Are there any signs of it? Take a look at the reference to Matthias Ettrich's comments about KDE-2.0 and LyX in LyX Development News (That I just realised I haven't announced on the lists yet): http://www.lyx.org/news/2913.php3 and at: