Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-15 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:51:11AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: No you don't! See also the mail I sent to lyx-devel. #:O) well before crying out you should try the stuff maybe, don't you think? And I'm right (and I did try it out;)

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-15 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 15-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: If you have 2 multicolumn cells side by side, and you want a double vertical rule then the latex code should be \multicolumn{1}{c||}{Foo} \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Bar} As I said before, you should not put | before the column type letter! Currently, LyX

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-15 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:51:11AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: No you don't! See also the mail I sent to lyx-devel. #:O) well before crying out you should try the stuff maybe, don't you think? And I'm right (and I did try it out;)

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-15 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 15-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: If you have 2 multicolumn cells side by side, and you want a double vertical rule then the latex code should be \multicolumn{1}{c||}{Foo} \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Bar} As I said before, you should not put | before the column type letter! Currently, LyX

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-15 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:51:11AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > No you don't! > > See also the mail I sent to lyx-devel. > > #:O) well before crying out you should try the stuff maybe, don't you think? > And I'm right (and I did try it out;) > >

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-15 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 15-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > If you have 2 multicolumn cells side by side, and you want a double vertical > rule then the latex code should be > \multicolumn{1}{c||}{Foo}& > \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Bar}& > > As I said before, you should not put | before the column type letter! > >

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 09:08:49PM -0400, Kevin Gross wrote: OK, that worked well. Now just a tiny problem remains. In the attached file, you will notice that the cell lines are a bit thicker for the first row than the other rows. Not sure why. At any rate, it is definitely good enough

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: The problem is that you should never use left vertical rule in a multicol cell (i.e. '\multicolumn{1}{|c}', except for the first column of the table. So the solution is to use right vertical rules '\multicolumn{1}{c|}' See the attached file. Yes and no. If

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:36:43AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: The problem is that you should never use left vertical rule in a multicol cell (i.e. '\multicolumn{1}{|c}', except for the first column of the table. So the solution is to use right vertical

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: No you don't! See also the mail I sent to lyx-devel. #:O) well before crying out you should try the stuff maybe, don't you think? And I'm right (and I did try it out;) Jürgen --

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 09:08:49PM -0400, Kevin Gross wrote: OK, that worked well. Now just a tiny problem remains. In the attached file, you will notice that the cell lines are a bit thicker for the first row than the other rows. Not sure why. At any rate, it is definitely good enough

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: The problem is that you should never use left vertical rule in a multicol cell (i.e. '\multicolumn{1}{|c}', except for the first column of the table. So the solution is to use right vertical rules '\multicolumn{1}{c|}' See the attached file. Yes and no. If

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:36:43AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: The problem is that you should never use left vertical rule in a multicol cell (i.e. '\multicolumn{1}{|c}', except for the first column of the table. So the solution is to use right vertical

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: No you don't! See also the mail I sent to lyx-devel. #:O) well before crying out you should try the stuff maybe, don't you think? And I'm right (and I did try it out;) Jürgen --

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 09:08:49PM -0400, Kevin Gross wrote: > OK, that worked well. Now just a tiny problem remains. In the attached > file, you will notice that the cell lines are a bit thicker for the first row > than the other rows. Not sure why. At any rate, it is definitely good >

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > The problem is that you should never use left vertical rule in a multicol > cell (i.e. '\multicolumn{1}{|c}', except for the first column of the table. > So the solution is to use right vertical rules '\multicolumn{1}{c|}' > See the attached file. Yes and no.

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:36:43AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > The problem is that you should never use left vertical rule in a multicol > > cell (i.e. '\multicolumn{1}{|c}', except for the first column of the table. > > So the solution is to use right

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-14 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 14-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > No you don't! > See also the mail I sent to lyx-devel. #:O) well before crying out you should try the stuff maybe, don't you think? And I'm right (and I did try it out;) Jürgen --

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-13 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:35:01PM -0400, Kevin Gross wrote: Hi all, I've got a set of tabular data. A considerable amount of the numbers are negative. I can easily create a table of the appropriate dimensions in lyx and paste in my data from an editor. However, in the final output, the

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-13 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:35:01PM -0400, Kevin Gross wrote: Hi all, I've got a set of tabular data. A considerable amount of the numbers are negative. I can easily create a table of the appropriate dimensions in lyx and paste in my data from an editor. However, in the final output, the

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-13 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:35:01PM -0400, Kevin Gross wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got a set of tabular data. A considerable amount of the numbers are > negative. I can easily create a table of the appropriate dimensions in lyx > and paste in my data from an editor. However, in the final output,

Large table full of numbers

2001-05-12 Thread Kevin Gross
Hi all, I've got a set of tabular data. A considerable amount of the numbers are negative. I can easily create a table of the appropriate dimensions in lyx and paste in my data from an editor. However, in the final output, the negative numbers are preceded by a dash instead of the more

Large table full of numbers

2001-05-12 Thread Kevin Gross
Hi all, I've got a set of tabular data. A considerable amount of the numbers are negative. I can easily create a table of the appropriate dimensions in lyx and paste in my data from an editor. However, in the final output, the negative numbers are preceded by a dash instead of the more

Large table full of numbers

2001-05-12 Thread Kevin Gross
Hi all, I've got a set of tabular data. A considerable amount of the numbers are negative. I can easily create a table of the appropriate dimensions in lyx and paste in my data from an editor. However, in the final output, the negative numbers are preceded by a dash instead of the more