Re: LyX grammar
Mark == Mark Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mark Is the file format for the .lyx files published anywhere? We Mark might want to do our own automatic generation and manipulation Mark of LyX files - so far I've just been going by the examples I can Mark generate and that's gone fairly well, but if we someday want to Mark implement a better parser it would probably be nicer to build up Mark a proper specification from a friendly document instead of just Mark looking through the source, especially with regard to hints as Mark to what might change! Such a thing unfortunately does not exist. We have begun in 1.3.0 to document changes in the file format, but the best way to understand the format is unfortunately to look at example files or read the parser code :( JMarc
Re: LyX grammar
Mark == Mark Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mark Is the file format for the .lyx files published anywhere? We Mark might want to do our own automatic generation and manipulation Mark of LyX files - so far I've just been going by the examples I can Mark generate and that's gone fairly well, but if we someday want to Mark implement a better parser it would probably be nicer to build up Mark a proper specification from a friendly document instead of just Mark looking through the source, especially with regard to hints as Mark to what might change! Such a thing unfortunately does not exist. We have begun in 1.3.0 to document changes in the file format, but the best way to understand the format is unfortunately to look at example files or read the parser code :( JMarc
Re: LyX grammar
> "Mark" == Mark Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> Is the file format for the .lyx files published anywhere? We Mark> might want to do our own automatic generation and manipulation Mark> of LyX files - so far I've just been going by the examples I can Mark> generate and that's gone fairly well, but if we someday want to Mark> implement a better parser it would probably be nicer to build up Mark> a proper specification from a friendly document instead of just Mark> looking through the source, especially with regard to hints as Mark> to what might change! Such a thing unfortunately does not exist. We have begun in 1.3.0 to document changes in the file format, but the best way to understand the format is unfortunately to look at example files or read the parser code :( JMarc
LyX grammar
Is the file format for the .lyx files published anywhere? We might want to do our own automatic generation and manipulation of LyX files - so far I've just been going by the examples I can generate and that's gone fairly well, but if we someday want to implement a better parser it would probably be nicer to build up a proper specification from a friendly document instead of just looking through the source, especially with regard to hints as to what might change! -- Mark
Re: LyX grammar
I strongly second this motion. I understand that the LyX format is changing, but it would still be nice to have some definitive information in front of me. Paul Is the file format for the .lyx files published anywhere? We might want to do our own automatic generation and manipulation of LyX files - so far I've just been going by the examples I can generate and that's gone fairly well, but if we someday want to implement a better parser it would probably be nicer to build up a proper specification from a friendly document instead of just looking through the source, especially with regard to hints as to what might change! -- Mark -- *Paul Tremblay * *[EMAIL PROTECTED]*
LyX grammar
Is the file format for the .lyx files published anywhere? We might want to do our own automatic generation and manipulation of LyX files - so far I've just been going by the examples I can generate and that's gone fairly well, but if we someday want to implement a better parser it would probably be nicer to build up a proper specification from a friendly document instead of just looking through the source, especially with regard to hints as to what might change! -- Mark
Re: LyX grammar
I strongly second this motion. I understand that the LyX format is changing, but it would still be nice to have some definitive information in front of me. Paul Is the file format for the .lyx files published anywhere? We might want to do our own automatic generation and manipulation of LyX files - so far I've just been going by the examples I can generate and that's gone fairly well, but if we someday want to implement a better parser it would probably be nicer to build up a proper specification from a friendly document instead of just looking through the source, especially with regard to hints as to what might change! -- Mark -- *Paul Tremblay * *[EMAIL PROTECTED]*
LyX grammar
Is the file format for the .lyx files published anywhere? We might want to do our own automatic generation and manipulation of LyX files - so far I've just been going by the examples I can generate and that's gone fairly well, but if we someday want to implement a better parser it would probably be nicer to build up a proper specification from a friendly document instead of just looking through the source, especially with regard to hints as to what might change! -- Mark
Re: LyX grammar
I strongly second this motion. I understand that the LyX format is changing, but it would still be nice to have some definitive information in front of me. Paul > > Is the file format for the .lyx files published anywhere? We might want to > do our own automatic generation and manipulation of LyX files - so far > I've just been going by the examples I can generate and that's gone fairly > well, but if we someday want to implement a better parser it would > probably be nicer to build up a proper specification from a friendly > document instead of just looking through the source, especially with > regard to hints as to what might change! > > -- Mark -- *Paul Tremblay * *[EMAIL PROTECTED]*
