Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-07 Thread Justin Wood
I just tested this in LyX 2.0 beta 2 on OS X and it worked fine — after I
changed the LyX pipe path (back) to ~/.lyxpipe, which is the default LyZ
setting. You could change LyZ alternatively of course.

Point being I think it's simply down to the pipe file path matching
correctly.

2010/12/6 lyx-users-digest-h...@lists.lyx.org

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Petr Šimon petr.si...@gmail.com
 To: sa...@lyx.org, lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
 Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 22:38:05 +0800
 Subject: Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

 On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
  Jose Quesada wrote:
  Thanks Pavel,
  So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
  I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)
 
  there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all
  backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
  more like the question for lyz developer, CC-ing now.
 
  actually the problem might be that we changed some lfuns for inserting
  citations and not pipes related at all... see RELEASE_NOTES for the list
  of changes.
 
  pavel
 
 Hi,
 thanks a lot. I didn't have time to do it yet, but I'll take care of it
 soon.
 Best
 Petr



Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-07 Thread Justin Wood
I just tested this in LyX 2.0 beta 2 on OS X and it worked fine — after I
changed the LyX pipe path (back) to ~/.lyxpipe, which is the default LyZ
setting. You could change LyZ alternatively of course.

Point being I think it's simply down to the pipe file path matching
correctly.

2010/12/6 lyx-users-digest-h...@lists.lyx.org

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Petr Šimon petr.si...@gmail.com
 To: sa...@lyx.org, lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
 Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 22:38:05 +0800
 Subject: Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

 On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
  Jose Quesada wrote:
  Thanks Pavel,
  So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
  I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)
 
  there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all
  backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
  more like the question for lyz developer, CC-ing now.
 
  actually the problem might be that we changed some lfuns for inserting
  citations and not pipes related at all... see RELEASE_NOTES for the list
  of changes.
 
  pavel
 
 Hi,
 thanks a lot. I didn't have time to do it yet, but I'll take care of it
 soon.
 Best
 Petr



Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-07 Thread Justin Wood
I just tested this in LyX 2.0 beta 2 on OS X and it worked fine — after I
changed the LyX pipe path (back) to ~/.lyxpipe, which is the default LyZ
setting. You could change LyZ alternatively of course.

Point being I think it's simply down to the pipe file path matching
correctly.

2010/12/6 <lyx-users-digest-h...@lists.lyx.org>

> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Petr Šimon" <petr.si...@gmail.com>
> To: <sa...@lyx.org>, <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 22:38:05 +0800
> Subject: Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?
>
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote:
> > Jose Quesada wrote:
> >> Thanks Pavel,
> >> So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
> >> I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)
> >
> > there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all
> > backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
> > more like the question for lyz developer, CC-ing now.
> >
> > actually the problem might be that we changed some lfuns for inserting
> > citations and not pipes related at all... see RELEASE_NOTES for the list
> > of changes.
> >
> > pavel
> >
> Hi,
> thanks a lot. I didn't have time to do it yet, but I'll take care of it
> soon.
> Best
> Petr
>


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-04 Thread Petr Šimon
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
 Jose Quesada wrote:
 Thanks Pavel,
 So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
 I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)

 there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all
 backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
 more like the question for lyz developer, CC-ing now.

 actually the problem might be that we changed some lfuns for inserting
 citations and not pipes related at all... see RELEASE_NOTES for the list
 of changes.

 pavel

Hi,
thanks a lot. I didn't have time to do it yet, but I'll take care of it soon.
Best
Petr


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-04 Thread Petr Šimon
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
 Jose Quesada wrote:
 Thanks Pavel,
 So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
 I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)

 there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all
 backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
 more like the question for lyz developer, CC-ing now.

 actually the problem might be that we changed some lfuns for inserting
 citations and not pipes related at all... see RELEASE_NOTES for the list
 of changes.

 pavel

Hi,
thanks a lot. I didn't have time to do it yet, but I'll take care of it soon.
Best
Petr


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-04 Thread Petr Šimon
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Sanda  wrote:
> Jose Quesada wrote:
>> Thanks Pavel,
>> So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
>> I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)
>
> there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all
> backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
> more like the question for lyz developer, CC-ing now.
>
> actually the problem might be that we changed some lfuns for inserting
> citations and not pipes related at all... see RELEASE_NOTES for the list
> of changes.
>
> pavel
>
Hi,
thanks a lot. I didn't have time to do it yet, but I'll take care of it soon.
Best
Petr


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Jose Quesada
Thanks Pavel,
So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:

 Jose Quesada wrote:
  /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
  /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
 
  I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have
 always
  been like that...

 yes, just try to run 1.6 and you will find them there.

 pavel




-- 
Best,
-Jose

Jose Quesada, PhD.
Research scientist,
Max Planck Institute,
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition,
Berlin
http://www.josequesada.name/
http://twitter.com/Quesada


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jose Quesada wrote:
 Thanks Pavel,
 So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
 I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)

there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all 
backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
more like the question for lyz developer, CC-ing now.

actually the problem might be that we changed some lfuns for inserting
citations and not pipes related at all... see RELEASE_NOTES for the list
of changes.

pavel


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Sam Madhani
Not sure with SVN, but with lyx 2b1 release lyz works almost fine. The only 
problem I had was that the latest lyz cannot create a bibtex record by itself, 
but that seems more like a lyz/firefox related problem. If I touch a .bib file 
manually, then lyz can port citations perfectly.


- Original Message -
From: Jose Quesada
Sent: 12/03/10 07:37 PM
To: sa...@lyx.org, lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

Thanks Pavel,
So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)




Regards,
Sam Madhani


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Jose Quesada
Thanks Pavel,
So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:

 Jose Quesada wrote:
  /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
  /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
 
  I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have
 always
  been like that...

 yes, just try to run 1.6 and you will find them there.

 pavel




-- 
Best,
-Jose

Jose Quesada, PhD.
Research scientist,
Max Planck Institute,
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition,
Berlin
http://www.josequesada.name/
http://twitter.com/Quesada


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jose Quesada wrote:
 Thanks Pavel,
 So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
 I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)

there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all 
backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
more like the question for lyz developer, CC-ing now.

actually the problem might be that we changed some lfuns for inserting
citations and not pipes related at all... see RELEASE_NOTES for the list
of changes.

pavel


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Sam Madhani
Not sure with SVN, but with lyx 2b1 release lyz works almost fine. The only 
problem I had was that the latest lyz cannot create a bibtex record by itself, 
but that seems more like a lyz/firefox related problem. If I touch a .bib file 
manually, then lyz can port citations perfectly.


- Original Message -
From: Jose Quesada
Sent: 12/03/10 07:37 PM
To: sa...@lyx.org, lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

Thanks Pavel,
So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)




Regards,
Sam Madhani


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Jose Quesada
Thanks Pavel,
So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Pavel Sanda  wrote:

> Jose Quesada wrote:
> > /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
> > /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
> >
> > I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have
> always
> > been like that...
>
> yes, just try to run 1.6 and you will find them there.
>
> pavel
>



-- 
Best,
-Jose

Jose Quesada, PhD.
Research scientist,
Max Planck Institute,
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition,
Berlin
http://www.josequesada.name/
http://twitter.com/Quesada


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jose Quesada wrote:
> Thanks Pavel,
> So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
> I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)

there were many changes i the pipe code, but i thought they were all 
backported to 1.6... well, i may be wrong. anyway the fixability looks
more like the question for lyz developer, CC-ing now.

actually the problem might be that we changed some lfuns for inserting
citations and not pipes related at all... see RELEASE_NOTES for the list
of changes.

pavel


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-03 Thread Sam Madhani
Not sure with SVN, but with lyx 2b1 release lyz works almost fine. The only 
problem I had was that the latest lyz cannot create a bibtex record by itself, 
but that seems more like a lyz/firefox related problem. If I touch a .bib file 
manually, then lyz can port citations perfectly.


- Original Message -
From: Jose Quesada
Sent: 12/03/10 07:37 PM
To: sa...@lyx.org, lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

Thanks Pavel,
So this means that 2.0beta/svn doesn't work with LyZ? Is this fixable?
I did try 1.6.8 and it did work :)




Regards,
Sam Madhani


LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-02 Thread Jose Quesada
Hi,

I use the LyZ FF addon to insert zotero references:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/56806/
(btw, highly recommended!)

I -think- it was working before on 2.0 svn, but I may be misremembering and
it might have been 1.6...
In any case one obvious problem seems to be that in LyZ preferences the
default lyxpipe is:

/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe

But looking for that file, I realized I have instead:
/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out

I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have always
been like that...
Have there been changes on the way lyx uses lyxpipes?
Could this be the reason it doesn't work? In any case, it could be a problem
on the LyZ side of course. Here's a hint in that direction:
http://www.klubko.net/wp/?page_id=945
Now I have to port it to new Zotero API, but I just have so little time to
look into it.

This single addon makes lyx an order of magnitude more useful to me. Please
let me know what I can do to help. Now that 2.0 is approaching rc, it'd be
nice to have it working by then.


-- 
Best,
-Jose

PS: looks like the entire LyZ architecture is a bit quirky: After much
opening and closing of programs I learned that I must open firefox *after*
have my document is opened in Lyx. This was the critical step that I missed.
Thanks again for writing this extremely useful program.


Jose Quesada, PhD.
Research scientist,
Max Planck Institute,
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition,
Berlin
http://www.josequesada.name/
http://twitter.com/Quesada


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-02 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jose Quesada wrote:
 /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
 /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
 
 I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have always
 been like that...

yes, just try to run 1.6 and you will find them there.

pavel


LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-02 Thread Jose Quesada
Hi,

I use the LyZ FF addon to insert zotero references:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/56806/
(btw, highly recommended!)

I -think- it was working before on 2.0 svn, but I may be misremembering and
it might have been 1.6...
In any case one obvious problem seems to be that in LyZ preferences the
default lyxpipe is:

/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe

But looking for that file, I realized I have instead:
/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out

I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have always
been like that...
Have there been changes on the way lyx uses lyxpipes?
Could this be the reason it doesn't work? In any case, it could be a problem
on the LyZ side of course. Here's a hint in that direction:
http://www.klubko.net/wp/?page_id=945
Now I have to port it to new Zotero API, but I just have so little time to
look into it.

This single addon makes lyx an order of magnitude more useful to me. Please
let me know what I can do to help. Now that 2.0 is approaching rc, it'd be
nice to have it working by then.


-- 
Best,
-Jose

PS: looks like the entire LyZ architecture is a bit quirky: After much
opening and closing of programs I learned that I must open firefox *after*
have my document is opened in Lyx. This was the critical step that I missed.
Thanks again for writing this extremely useful program.


Jose Quesada, PhD.
Research scientist,
Max Planck Institute,
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition,
Berlin
http://www.josequesada.name/
http://twitter.com/Quesada


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-02 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jose Quesada wrote:
 /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
 /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
 
 I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have always
 been like that...

yes, just try to run 1.6 and you will find them there.

pavel


LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-02 Thread Jose Quesada
Hi,

I use the LyZ FF addon to insert zotero references:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/56806/
(btw, highly recommended!)

I -think- it was working before on 2.0 svn, but I may be misremembering and
it might have been 1.6...
In any case one obvious problem seems to be that in LyZ preferences the
default lyxpipe is:

/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe

But looking for that file, I realized I have instead:
/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
/home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out

I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have always
been like that...
Have there been changes on the way lyx uses lyxpipes?
Could this be the reason it doesn't work? In any case, it could be a problem
on the LyZ side of course. Here's a hint in that direction:
http://www.klubko.net/wp/?page_id=945
"Now I have to port it to new Zotero API, but I just have so little time to
look into it."

This single addon makes lyx an order of magnitude more useful to me. Please
let me know what I can do to help. Now that 2.0 is approaching rc, it'd be
nice to have it working by then.


-- 
Best,
-Jose

PS: looks like the entire LyZ architecture is a bit quirky: "After much
opening and closing of programs I learned that I must open firefox *after*
have my document is opened in Lyx. This was the critical step that I missed.
Thanks again for writing this extremely useful program.""


Jose Quesada, PhD.
Research scientist,
Max Planck Institute,
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition,
Berlin
http://www.josequesada.name/
http://twitter.com/Quesada


Re: LyZ: lyxpipe changes in 2.0?

2010-12-02 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jose Quesada wrote:
> /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.in
> /home/user/.lyx/lyxpipe.out
> 
> I never cared to look for this before because it worked, it may have always
> been like that...

yes, just try to run 1.6 and you will find them there.

pavel