Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-14 Thread Rex Dieter
Pavel Sanda wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change will be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as there is no need to issue an update with this single change. Reminds me, for posterity, I'll

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-14 Thread Rex Dieter
Pavel Sanda wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change will be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as there is no need to issue an update with this single change. Reminds me, for posterity, I'll

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-14 Thread Rex Dieter
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: >>> I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change >>> will >>> be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 >>> as there is no need to issue an update with this single change. >> >> Reminds me, for

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-11 Thread José Matos
On Saturday 09 January 2010 11:33:25 Alex Fernandez wrote: Are you interested in packaging eLyXer for Fedora? May I help in any way? The Debian package is in testing (ready for the next stable) and it is quite mature. The latest version is also in Ubuntu:

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-11 Thread José Matos
On Saturday 09 January 2010 11:33:25 Alex Fernandez wrote: Are you interested in packaging eLyXer for Fedora? May I help in any way? The Debian package is in testing (ready for the next stable) and it is quite mature. The latest version is also in Ubuntu:

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-11 Thread José Matos
On Saturday 09 January 2010 11:33:25 Alex Fernandez wrote: > Are you interested in packaging eLyXer for Fedora? May I help in any way? > > The Debian package is in testing (ready for the next stable) and it is > quite mature. The latest version is also in Ubuntu: >

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-09 Thread Alex Fernandez
Hi José, 2010/1/7 José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt: To put this into perspective this tools is just one of the several that lyx can use if present. Other examples are ht2html, elyxer (when we package this in fedora), inkscape, tgif, xfig, grace and a lot of other converters that can be used to

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
Rex Dieter wrote: I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change will be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as there is no need to issue an update with this single change. Reminds me, for posterity, I'll brainstorm on ways to make

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-09 Thread Alex Fernandez
Hi José, 2010/1/7 José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt: To put this into perspective this tools is just one of the several that lyx can use if present. Other examples are ht2html, elyxer (when we package this in fedora), inkscape, tgif, xfig, grace and a lot of other converters that can be used to

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
Rex Dieter wrote: I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change will be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as there is no need to issue an update with this single change. Reminds me, for posterity, I'll brainstorm on ways to make

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-09 Thread Alex Fernandez
Hi José, 2010/1/7 José Matos : > To put this into perspective this tools is just one of the several that lyx > can use if present. Other examples are ht2html, elyxer (when we package this > in fedora), inkscape, tgif, xfig, grace and a lot of other converters that can > be used

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
Rex Dieter wrote: >> I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change >> will >> be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as >> there is no need to issue an update with this single change. > > Reminds me, for posterity, I'll brainstorm on

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 07 January 2010 22:40:32 rgheck wrote: But ImageMagick, if I'm not mistaken, is the default converter that we use not just for output but also for converting images to formats we can display in LyX. It's the converter of last resort. For that reason, it seems to me to make good

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread Rex Dieter
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 07 January 2010 22:40:32 rgheck wrote: But ImageMagick, if I'm not mistaken, is the default converter that we use not just for output but also for converting images to formats we can display in LyX. It's the converter of last resort. For that

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread José Matos
On Friday 08 January 2010 13:58:39 Rex Dieter wrote: No objection. -- Rex OK, thanks. I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change will be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as there is no need to issue an update with this

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread Rex Dieter
On 01/08/2010 10:55 AM, José Matos wrote: On Friday 08 January 2010 13:58:39 Rex Dieter wrote: No objection. OK, thanks. I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change will be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as there is no need

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 07 January 2010 22:40:32 rgheck wrote: But ImageMagick, if I'm not mistaken, is the default converter that we use not just for output but also for converting images to formats we can display in LyX. It's the converter of last resort. For that reason, it seems to me to make good

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread Rex Dieter
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 07 January 2010 22:40:32 rgheck wrote: But ImageMagick, if I'm not mistaken, is the default converter that we use not just for output but also for converting images to formats we can display in LyX. It's the converter of last resort. For that

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread José Matos
On Friday 08 January 2010 13:58:39 Rex Dieter wrote: No objection. -- Rex OK, thanks. I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change will be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as there is no need to issue an update with this

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread Rex Dieter
On 01/08/2010 10:55 AM, José Matos wrote: On Friday 08 January 2010 13:58:39 Rex Dieter wrote: No objection. OK, thanks. I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change will be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as there is no need

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 07 January 2010 22:40:32 rgheck wrote: > But ImageMagick, if I'm not mistaken, is the "default converter" that we > use not just for output but also for converting images to formats we can > display in LyX. It's the "converter of last resort". For that reason, it > seems to me to

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread Rex Dieter
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 07 January 2010 22:40:32 rgheck wrote: But ImageMagick, if I'm not mistaken, is the "default converter" that we use not just for output but also for converting images to formats we can display in LyX. It's the "converter of last resort". For

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread José Matos
On Friday 08 January 2010 13:58:39 Rex Dieter wrote: > No objection. > > -- Rex OK, thanks. I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change will be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as there is no need to issue an update with this

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-08 Thread Rex Dieter
On 01/08/2010 10:55 AM, José Matos wrote: On Friday 08 January 2010 13:58:39 Rex Dieter wrote: No objection. OK, thanks. I will commit the new Require to rawhide (and release there). The change will be propagated to F-11 and F-12 with LyX's the next stable release 1.6.6 as there is no need

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread Dr. Gyorgy Pota
Dear Manoj, Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it was more important to write to the Lyx users first. Regards, Gyorgy

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 07 January 2010 21:55:40 Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Manoj, Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it was more important to write to the Lyx users first. I read this list. :-) I suspect (remember?) that this issue has been discussed before. The fix

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread rgheck
On 01/07/2010 04:55 PM, Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Manoj, Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it was more important to write to the Lyx users first. No, this is entirely a Fedora issue. It should be sufficient to post to fedora-l...@redhat.com, which, if

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread rgheck
On 01/07/2010 05:18 PM, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 07 January 2010 21:55:40 Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Manoj, Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it was more important to write to the Lyx users first. I read this list. :-) I suspect (remember?)

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread Dr. Gyorgy Pota
Dear Manoj, Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it was more important to write to the Lyx users first. Regards, Gyorgy

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 07 January 2010 21:55:40 Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Manoj, Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it was more important to write to the Lyx users first. I read this list. :-) I suspect (remember?) that this issue has been discussed before. The fix

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread rgheck
On 01/07/2010 04:55 PM, Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Manoj, Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it was more important to write to the Lyx users first. No, this is entirely a Fedora issue. It should be sufficient to post to fedora-l...@redhat.com, which, if

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread rgheck
On 01/07/2010 05:18 PM, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 07 January 2010 21:55:40 Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Manoj, Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it was more important to write to the Lyx users first. I read this list. :-) I suspect (remember?)

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread Dr. Gyorgy Pota
Dear Manoj, Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it was more important to write to the Lyx users first. Regards, Gyorgy

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 07 January 2010 21:55:40 Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: > Dear Manoj, > > Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it > was more important to write to the Lyx users first. I read this list. :-) I suspect (remember?) that this issue has been discussed before. The

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread rgheck
On 01/07/2010 04:55 PM, Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Manoj, Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it was more important to write to the Lyx users first. No, this is entirely a Fedora issue. It should be sufficient to post to fedora-l...@redhat.com, which, if

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-07 Thread rgheck
On 01/07/2010 05:18 PM, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 07 January 2010 21:55:40 Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Manoj, Unfortunately, I had no time to contact Fedora packagers. I thought it was more important to write to the Lyx users first. I read this list. :-) I suspect (remember?)

Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-06 Thread Dr. Gyorgy Pota
Dear Users, Lyx did not show any eps figures in a freshly installed Fedora 12 system. Running Lyx in a terminal revealed that convert was unsuccesful. Finally it turned out that ImageMagick was not installed for Lyx although I installed Lyx via yum, which, in principle, installs everything

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-06 Thread Neal Becker
Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Users, Lyx did not show any eps figures in a freshly installed Fedora 12 system. Running Lyx in a terminal revealed that convert was unsuccesful. Finally it turned out that ImageMagick was not installed for Lyx although I installed Lyx via yum, which

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-06 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
This is probably a packaging error on Fedora 12. Have you tried to discover and contact the maintainer for this package? -- Manoj On Wednesday 06 January 2010 08:05:39 am Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Users, Lyx did not show any eps figures in a freshly installed Fedora 12 system. Running

Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-06 Thread Dr. Gyorgy Pota
Dear Users, Lyx did not show any eps figures in a freshly installed Fedora 12 system. Running Lyx in a terminal revealed that convert was unsuccesful. Finally it turned out that ImageMagick was not installed for Lyx although I installed Lyx via yum, which, in principle, installs everything

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-06 Thread Neal Becker
Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Users, Lyx did not show any eps figures in a freshly installed Fedora 12 system. Running Lyx in a terminal revealed that convert was unsuccesful. Finally it turned out that ImageMagick was not installed for Lyx although I installed Lyx via yum, which

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-06 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
This is probably a packaging error on Fedora 12. Have you tried to discover and contact the maintainer for this package? -- Manoj On Wednesday 06 January 2010 08:05:39 am Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: Dear Users, Lyx did not show any eps figures in a freshly installed Fedora 12 system. Running

Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-06 Thread Dr. Gyorgy Pota
Dear Users, Lyx did not show any eps figures in a freshly installed Fedora 12 system. Running Lyx in a terminal revealed that "convert" was unsuccesful. Finally it turned out that ImageMagick was not installed for Lyx although I installed Lyx via yum, which, in principle

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-06 Thread Neal Becker
Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: > Dear Users, > > Lyx did not show any eps figures in a freshly installed Fedora 12 > system. Running Lyx in a terminal revealed that "convert" was > unsuccesful. Finally it turned out that ImageMagick was not installed > for Lyx although I

Re: Lyx in Fedora 12

2010-01-06 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
This is probably a packaging error on Fedora 12. Have you tried to discover and contact the maintainer for this package? -- Manoj On Wednesday 06 January 2010 08:05:39 am Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote: > Dear Users, > > Lyx did not show any eps figures in a freshly installed Fedora 12