My experience has been that word2tex is the only program that will work well
with lots of math equations. But over the years, Word has handled math
in a bunch of different ways, so I'd recommend getting an evaluation version
first, and making sure it works for your particular word documents.
My experience has been that word2tex is the only program that will work well
with lots of math equations. But over the years, Word has handled math
in a bunch of different ways, so I'd recommend getting an evaluation version
first, and making sure it works for your particular word documents.
> My experience has been that word2tex is the only program that will work well
> with "lots of math equations". But over the years, Word has handled math
> in a bunch of different ways, so I'd recommend getting an evaluation version
> first, and making sure it works for your particular word
Murat Yildizoglu myi...@gmail.com wrote:
You could check rtftolatex, and openoffice (oolatex) based solutions too. I
use word2tex from Chikrii Software (it is a commercial soft, with an
interesting education price), it allows me to save in latex from Word. You
can customize what you want to
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012, Wilfried wrote:
Even at least one publisher of
scientific journals (I don't remember who) requests authors NOT to use
the new Word 2007 - 2010 equation editor but the old equation editor or
MathType.
This is common in my field (chemistry): scientific journals ask for
Murat Yildizoglu myi...@gmail.com wrote:
You could check rtftolatex, and openoffice (oolatex) based solutions too. I
use word2tex from Chikrii Software (it is a commercial soft, with an
interesting education price), it allows me to save in latex from Word. You
can customize what you want to
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012, Wilfried wrote:
Even at least one publisher of
scientific journals (I don't remember who) requests authors NOT to use
the new Word 2007 - 2010 equation editor but the old equation editor or
MathType.
This is common in my field (chemistry): scientific journals ask for
Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
> You could check rtftolatex, and openoffice (oolatex) based solutions too. I
> use word2tex from Chikrii Software (it is a commercial soft, with an
> interesting education price), it allows me to save in latex from Word. You
> can customize what you
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012, Wilfried wrote:
>
> Even at least one publisher of
> scientific journals (I don't remember who) requests authors NOT to use
> the new Word 2007 - 2010 equation editor but the old equation editor or
> MathType.
This is common in my field (chemistry): scientific journals ask
Hi,
I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word, containing
lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX. Is there any
way to do it? I see that this issue was discussed in the past in this forum,
and the suggestion was to write the doc file in the html
You could check rtftolatex, and openoffice (oolatex) based solutions too. I
use word2tex from Chikrii Software (it is a commercial soft, with an
interesting education price), it allows me to save in latex from Word. You
can customize what you want to include in the translation (I keep only the
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012, Leslaw Bieniasz wrote:
I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word, containing
lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX.
My experience has been that word2tex is the only program that will work well
with lots of math equations.
On 01/09/2012 07:11 AM, Leslaw Bieniasz wrote:
Hi,
I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word, containing
lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX. Is there any
way to do it? I see that this issue was discussed in the past in this forum,
and the
On 01/09/2012 08:06 AM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
You could check rtftolatex, and openoffice (oolatex) based solutions too.
oolatex goes the other way. But Libre Office (the successor to Open
Office) can export a file as LaTeX.
Richard
Thanks Richard for the correction,
I have mixed these two-way packages... I was thinking about the
writer2latex filter that allows us to save in Latex format (I use it with
NeoOffice, under OSX).
2012/1/9 Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net
On 01/09/2012 08:06 AM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
You
Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net írta:
On 01/09/2012 07:11 AM, Leslaw Bieniasz wrote:
Hi,
I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word,
containing
lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX. Is there
any way to do it? I see that this issue was
You should be able to install the extension writer2latex that normally gives
this filter for the save dialog.
--
Murat Yildizoglu
yi...@u-bordeaux4.fr
Le 9 janv. 2012 à 20:48, Csikos Bela bcsikos...@freemail.hu a écrit :
Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net írta:
On 01/09/2012 07:11 AM, Leslaw
Hi,
I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word, containing
lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX. Is there any
way to do it? I see that this issue was discussed in the past in this forum,
and the suggestion was to write the doc file in the html
You could check rtftolatex, and openoffice (oolatex) based solutions too. I
use word2tex from Chikrii Software (it is a commercial soft, with an
interesting education price), it allows me to save in latex from Word. You
can customize what you want to include in the translation (I keep only the
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012, Leslaw Bieniasz wrote:
I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word, containing
lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX.
My experience has been that word2tex is the only program that will work well
with lots of math equations.
On 01/09/2012 07:11 AM, Leslaw Bieniasz wrote:
Hi,
I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word, containing
lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX. Is there any
way to do it? I see that this issue was discussed in the past in this forum,
and the
On 01/09/2012 08:06 AM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
You could check rtftolatex, and openoffice (oolatex) based solutions too.
oolatex goes the other way. But Libre Office (the successor to Open
Office) can export a file as LaTeX.
Richard
Thanks Richard for the correction,
I have mixed these two-way packages... I was thinking about the
writer2latex filter that allows us to save in Latex format (I use it with
NeoOffice, under OSX).
2012/1/9 Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net
On 01/09/2012 08:06 AM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
You
Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net írta:
On 01/09/2012 07:11 AM, Leslaw Bieniasz wrote:
Hi,
I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word,
containing
lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX. Is there
any way to do it? I see that this issue was
You should be able to install the extension writer2latex that normally gives
this filter for the save dialog.
--
Murat Yildizoglu
yi...@u-bordeaux4.fr
Le 9 janv. 2012 à 20:48, Csikos Bela bcsikos...@freemail.hu a écrit :
Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net írta:
On 01/09/2012 07:11 AM, Leslaw
Hi,
I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word, containing
lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX. Is there any
way to do it? I see that this issue was discussed in the past in this forum,
and the suggestion was to write the doc file in the html
You could check rtftolatex, and openoffice (oolatex) based solutions too. I
use word2tex from Chikrii Software (it is a commercial soft, with an
interesting education price), it allows me to save in latex from Word. You
can customize what you want to include in the translation (I keep only the
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012, Leslaw Bieniasz wrote:
>
> I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word, containing
> lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX.
My experience has been that word2tex is the only program that will work well
with "lots of math
On 01/09/2012 07:11 AM, Leslaw Bieniasz wrote:
Hi,
I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word, containing
lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX. Is there any
way to do it? I see that this issue was discussed in the past in this forum,
and the
On 01/09/2012 08:06 AM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
You could check rtftolatex, and openoffice (oolatex) based solutions too.
oolatex goes the other way. But Libre Office (the successor to Open
Office) can export a file as LaTeX.
Richard
Thanks Richard for the correction,
I have mixed these two-way packages... I was thinking about the
writer2latex filter that allows us to save in Latex format (I use it with
NeoOffice, under OSX).
2012/1/9 Richard Heck
> On 01/09/2012 08:06 AM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
>
>>
Richard Heck írta:
>>On 01/09/2012 07:11 AM, Leslaw Bieniasz wrote:>
>> Hi,>
>>
>> I am new to LaTeX and LyX. I have a document written in MS Word,
>> >>containing>
>> lots of math equations plus text, and I want to copy it into LyX. Is there
>> >>any way to do it? I see
You should be able to install the extension writer2latex that normally gives
this filter for the save dialog.
--
Murat Yildizoglu
yi...@u-bordeaux4.fr
Le 9 janv. 2012 à 20:48, Csikos Bela a écrit :
> Richard Heck írta:
>>> On 01/09/2012 07:11 AM,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009, Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
So, it seems the only solution is word2tex -- it appears to
do the conversion better than GrindEQ. But it is hard
to judge from the trial version, and the real version is
quite expensive (and risky, since it seems support is
non-existent).
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009, Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
So, it seems the only solution is word2tex -- it appears to
do the conversion better than GrindEQ. But it is hard
to judge from the trial version, and the real version is
quite expensive (and risky, since it seems support is
non-existent).
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009, Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
> So, it seems the only solution is word2tex -- it appears to
> do the conversion better than GrindEQ. But it is hard
> to judge from the trial version, and the real version is
> quite expensive (and risky, since it seems support is
> non-existent).
Richard Heck rgh...@... writes:
There's also the free wvLatex program that you can try. I don't know if
it runs on Windows. See here:
http://wvware.sourceforge.net/
But if it doesn't, that's a good reason to dual boot Linux.
I looked vwLatex. They refer to AbiWord,
But I couldn't make
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
Richard Heck rgh...@... writes:
There's also the free wvLatex program that you can try. I don't know if
it runs on Windows. See here:
http://wvware.sourceforge.net/
But if it doesn't, that's a good reason to dual boot Linux.
I looked vwLatex. They refer
Richard Heck rgh...@... writes:
There's also the free wvLatex program that you can try. I don't know if
it runs on Windows. See here:
http://wvware.sourceforge.net/
But if it doesn't, that's a good reason to dual boot Linux.
I looked vwLatex. They refer to AbiWord,
But I couldn't make
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
Richard Heck rgh...@... writes:
There's also the free wvLatex program that you can try. I don't know if
it runs on Windows. See here:
http://wvware.sourceforge.net/
But if it doesn't, that's a good reason to dual boot Linux.
I looked vwLatex. They refer
Richard Heck writes:
> There's also the free wvLatex program that you can try. I don't know if
> it runs on Windows. See here:
> http://wvware.sourceforge.net/
> But if it doesn't, that's a good reason to dual boot Linux.
I looked vwLatex. They refer to AbiWord,
But I couldn't
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
Richard Heck writes:
There's also the free wvLatex program that you can try. I don't know if
it runs on Windows. See here:
http://wvware.sourceforge.net/
But if it doesn't, that's a good reason to dual boot Linux.
I looked vwLatex. They
LyX is really a great way to write math. Therefore I would like to
convert my old MS Word documents --
with a lot of equation in Equation Editor -- to
LyX (these are documents I continually revise). Any advise
about this? I found two commercial packages for conversion
to LaTeX: Grind EQ and
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
LyX is really a great way to write math. Therefore I would like to
convert my old MS Word documents --
with a lot of equation in Equation Editor -- to
LyX (these are documents I continually revise). Any advise
about this? I found two commercial packages for
Richard Heck rgh...@... writes:
OpenOffice will export LaTeX. You should be able to load your Word docs
there, and then export. Might be no worse. You WILL have to do hand
editing, one way or the other. There's just no way around it.
I tried to install open office (neo office). It does
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
I tried to install open office (neo office). It does convert to LaTeX.
But the issue is that it seems the philosophy in the OO converter is to
make the typeset
LaTeX document look like the OO document, rather than conveying the
meaning/contents
of the document --
LyX is really a great way to write math. Therefore I would like to
convert my old MS Word documents --
with a lot of equation in Equation Editor -- to
LyX (these are documents I continually revise). Any advise
about this? I found two commercial packages for conversion
to LaTeX: Grind EQ and
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
LyX is really a great way to write math. Therefore I would like to
convert my old MS Word documents --
with a lot of equation in Equation Editor -- to
LyX (these are documents I continually revise). Any advise
about this? I found two commercial packages for
Richard Heck rgh...@... writes:
OpenOffice will export LaTeX. You should be able to load your Word docs
there, and then export. Might be no worse. You WILL have to do hand
editing, one way or the other. There's just no way around it.
I tried to install open office (neo office). It does
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
I tried to install open office (neo office). It does convert to LaTeX.
But the issue is that it seems the philosophy in the OO converter is to
make the typeset
LaTeX document look like the OO document, rather than conveying the
meaning/contents
of the document --
LyX is really a great way to write math. Therefore I would like to
convert my old MS Word documents --
with a lot of equation in Equation Editor -- to
LyX (these are documents I continually revise). Any advise
about this? I found two commercial packages for conversion
to LaTeX: Grind EQ and
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
LyX is really a great way to write math. Therefore I would like to
convert my old MS Word documents --
with a lot of equation in Equation Editor -- to
LyX (these are documents I continually revise). Any advise
about this? I found two commercial packages for
Richard Heck writes:
> >
> OpenOffice will export LaTeX. You should be able to load your Word docs
> there, and then export. Might be no worse. You WILL have to do hand
> editing, one way or the other. There's just no way around it.
I tried to install open office (neo office).
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
> I tried to install open office (neo office). It does convert to LaTeX.
> But the issue is that it seems the philosophy in the OO converter is to
> make the typeset
> LaTeX document look like the OO document, rather than conveying the
> meaning/contents
> of the
Manveru wrote:
Have you ever merge XML? I tried - it is horrible work.
It depends entirely on how the XML document is formatted. There's
nothing that prevents XML with sensible line breaks, for example.
I keep lots of XHTML documents in CVS. They're well-formatted, so
merging works just
Steve Litt wrote:
Trouble is, replacing \begin..\end with .../ is a hack. LyX developers
have defined LyX native format as \begin always is the first character on a
line. There's no such requirement in XML, and if we require it, that's a
hack. If we don't require it, LyX-XML parsing becomes
Michael Wojcik wrote:
I don't expect the
switch to XML to cause me any problems, and to be honest I'm a bit
puzzled by all the worrying.
/me too :-)
Abdel.
Manveru wrote:
Have you ever merge XML? I tried - it is horrible work.
It depends entirely on how the XML document is formatted. There's
nothing that prevents XML with sensible line breaks, for example.
I keep lots of XHTML documents in CVS. They're well-formatted, so
merging works just
Steve Litt wrote:
Trouble is, replacing \begin..\end with .../ is a hack. LyX developers
have defined LyX native format as \begin always is the first character on a
line. There's no such requirement in XML, and if we require it, that's a
hack. If we don't require it, LyX-XML parsing becomes
Michael Wojcik wrote:
I don't expect the
switch to XML to cause me any problems, and to be honest I'm a bit
puzzled by all the worrying.
/me too :-)
Abdel.
Manveru wrote:
Have you ever merge XML? I tried - it is horrible work.
It depends entirely on how the XML document is formatted. There's
nothing that prevents XML with sensible line breaks, for example.
I keep lots of XHTML documents in CVS. They're well-formatted, so
merging works just
Steve Litt wrote:
Trouble is, replacing \begin..\end with <>... is a hack. LyX developers
have defined LyX native format as \begin always is the first character on a
line. There's no such requirement in XML, and if we require it, that's a
hack. If we don't require it, LyX-XML parsing becomes
Michael Wojcik wrote:
I don't expect the
switch to XML to cause me any problems, and to be honest I'm a bit
puzzled by all the worrying.
/me too :-)
Abdel.
On Monday 28 July 2008 01:10, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
formats. And this discussion reminds me
On 28.07.08, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 28 July 2008 01:10, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
... Have you ever merged XML? I tried - it is horrible work.
I don't see why it
G. Milde wrote:
On 28.07.08, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 28 July 2008 01:10, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
... Have you ever merged XML? I tried - it is horrible work.
I don't see
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
formats. And this discussion reminds me something about XML what almost
nobody is
On Monday 28 July 2008 01:10, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
formats. And this discussion reminds me
On 28.07.08, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 28 July 2008 01:10, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
... Have you ever merged XML? I tried - it is horrible work.
I don't see why it
G. Milde wrote:
On 28.07.08, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 28 July 2008 01:10, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
... Have you ever merged XML? I tried - it is horrible work.
I don't see
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
formats. And this discussion reminds me something about XML what almost
nobody is
On Monday 28 July 2008 01:10, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To the discussion about data format preference:
> >
> > I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
> > formats. And this discussion
On 28.07.08, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2008 01:10, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > To the discussion about data format preference:
> > >
> > > ... Have you ever merged XML? I tried - it is horrible work.
> >
> > I
G. Milde wrote:
On 28.07.08, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 28 July 2008 01:10, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
... Have you ever merged XML? I tried - it is horrible work.
I don't
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
formats. And this discussion reminds me something about XML what almost
nobody
On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:07:19 Pavel Sanda wrote:
frankly - these are nice dreams, but there is not manpower to do it.
my feeling is that the xml-branch commit activity pefectly shows what will
happen after the worst bugs will be repaired in xml merged trunk.
or you have some particular
On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:07:19 Pavel Sanda wrote:
frankly - these are nice dreams, but there is not manpower to do it.
my feeling is that the xml-branch commit activity pefectly shows what will
happen after the worst bugs will be repaired in xml merged trunk.
or you have some
To the discussion about data format preference:
I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
formats. And this discussion reminds me something about XML what almost
nobody is remeber about. How many LyX user are working in large team
projects? How often they have to
Hi all,
A couple days ago it took the entire day to change all the tables from markers
to real tables. It was a tough job.
Today I put in the 10 images into the book. What made it hard was that the old
images were object embbedded Micrografx Windows Draw images. MGX Windows Draw
was a
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
formats. And this discussion reminds me something about XML what almost
nobody is remeber about. How many
On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:07:19 Pavel Sanda wrote:
frankly - these are nice dreams, but there is not manpower to do it.
my feeling is that the xml-branch commit activity pefectly shows what will
happen after the worst bugs will be repaired in xml merged trunk.
or you have some particular
On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:07:19 Pavel Sanda wrote:
frankly - these are nice dreams, but there is not manpower to do it.
my feeling is that the xml-branch commit activity pefectly shows what will
happen after the worst bugs will be repaired in xml merged trunk.
or you have some
To the discussion about data format preference:
I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
formats. And this discussion reminds me something about XML what almost
nobody is remeber about. How many LyX user are working in large team
projects? How often they have to
Hi all,
A couple days ago it took the entire day to change all the tables from markers
to real tables. It was a tough job.
Today I put in the 10 images into the book. What made it hard was that the old
images were object embbedded Micrografx Windows Draw images. MGX Windows Draw
was a
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the discussion about data format preference:
I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
formats. And this discussion reminds me something about XML what almost
nobody is remeber about. How many
On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:07:19 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> frankly - these are nice dreams, but there is not manpower to do it.
> my feeling is that the xml-branch commit activity pefectly shows what will
> happen after the worst bugs will be repaired in xml merged trunk.
>
> or you have some
> On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:07:19 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > frankly - these are nice dreams, but there is not manpower to do it.
> > my feeling is that the xml-branch commit activity pefectly shows what will
> > happen after the worst bugs will be repaired in xml merged trunk.
> >
> > or you have
To the discussion about data format preference:
I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
formats. And this discussion reminds me something about XML what almost
nobody is remeber about. How many LyX user are working in large team
projects? How often they have to
Hi all,
A couple days ago it took the entire day to change all the tables from markers
to real tables. It was a tough job.
Today I put in the 10 images into the book. What made it hard was that the old
images were object embbedded Micrografx Windows Draw images. MGX Windows Draw
was a
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Manveru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To the discussion about data format preference:
>
> I am reading all your comments about XML, YAML and other suggested data
> formats. And this discussion reminds me something about XML what almost
> nobody is remeber about. How
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 19:24:16 Pavel Sanda wrote:
this depends on what you master. i'm used on the bunch of small unix
utilities so i gave that sed example. if you know python you will do in
python. my point was not propose the best tools but to groan and moan about
xml :)
FWIW this chunk
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Steve Litt wrote:
As a sed/awk/perl/ruby parser, I appreciate that very much.
The more I think about it, the more I think I should make the XML-YAML
and YAML-XML converters. That way, if future generations of LyX project
programmers forget why it's important to space
what I claim is that we need better
script tools to handle lyx documents. Those tools should be stable across lyx
versions and should not depend of any particular file format.
frankly - these are nice dreams, but there is not manpower to do it.
my feeling is that the xml-branch commit
I understand DTD simplicity... but it is no longer fresh these days. Schema
allows better understanding and can be processed by XSLT.
2008/7/23 John [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 08:04:59 am Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 11:32, rgheck wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 19:24:16 Pavel Sanda wrote:
this depends on what you master. i'm used on the bunch of small unix
utilities so i gave that sed example. if you know python you will do in
python. my point was not propose the best tools but to groan and moan about
xml :)
FWIW this chunk
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Steve Litt wrote:
As a sed/awk/perl/ruby parser, I appreciate that very much.
The more I think about it, the more I think I should make the XML-YAML
and YAML-XML converters. That way, if future generations of LyX project
programmers forget why it's important to space
what I claim is that we need better
script tools to handle lyx documents. Those tools should be stable across lyx
versions and should not depend of any particular file format.
frankly - these are nice dreams, but there is not manpower to do it.
my feeling is that the xml-branch commit
I understand DTD simplicity... but it is no longer fresh these days. Schema
allows better understanding and can be processed by XSLT.
2008/7/23 John [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 08:04:59 am Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 11:32, rgheck wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 19:24:16 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> this depends on what you master. i'm used on the bunch of small unix
> utilities so i gave that sed example. if you know python you will do in
> python. my point was not propose the best tools but to groan and moan about
> xml :)
FWIW this
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Steve Litt wrote:
As a sed/awk/perl/ruby parser, I appreciate that very much.
The more I think about it, the more I think I should make the XML->YAML
and YAML->XML converters. That way, if future generations of LyX project
programmers forget why it's important to space
1 - 100 of 282 matches
Mail list logo