Neal Becker wrote:
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/KggwCNPXuRQ/article.pl
The fact that they can now use some features that was only found in TeX
before is not enough to compete.
Will the documents look good automatically, like they do with TeX? Is
Neal Becker wrote:
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/KggwCNPXuRQ/article.pl
The fact that they can now use some features that was only found in TeX
before is not enough to compete.
Will the documents look good automatically, like they do with TeX? Is
Neal Becker wrote:
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/KggwCNPXuRQ/article.pl
The fact that they can now use some features that was only found in TeX
before is not enough to compete.
Will the documents look good automatically, like they do with TeX? Is
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/KggwCNPXuRQ/article.pl
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Neal Becker wrote:
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/KggwCNPXuRQ/article.pl
Yawn. What the commenters left out of those mostly on-target replies to
the original post is that there is more to typesetting a page than
ligatures. Intercharacter spacing, using
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/KggwCNPXuRQ/article.pl
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Neal Becker wrote:
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/KggwCNPXuRQ/article.pl
Yawn. What the commenters left out of those mostly on-target replies to
the original post is that there is more to typesetting a page than
ligatures. Intercharacter spacing, using
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/KggwCNPXuRQ/article.pl
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Neal Becker wrote:
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/KggwCNPXuRQ/article.pl
Yawn. What the commenters left out of those mostly on-target replies to
the original post is that there is more to typesetting a page than
ligatures. Intercharacter spacing, using
