On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:06:28PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Wherever it makes sense we do use the Qt library for UI, as much as
possible. Unfortunately the Qt library is very much our way or no way
at all in large part... in particular truly separated MVC seems very
hard to do if we
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:06:28PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Wherever it makes sense we do use the Qt library for UI, as much as
possible. Unfortunately the Qt library is very much our way or no way
at all in large part... in particular truly separated MVC seems very
hard to do if we
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:06:28PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Wherever it makes sense we do use the Qt library for UI, as much as
> > possible. Unfortunately the Qt library is very much "our way or no way
> > at all" in large part... in particular truly separated MVC seems very
> > hard to
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 03:56:38PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
I'm going way outside my competence, but the difference between Boost and
Qt/KDE is that Boost seems to me that Boost is a classical library : more
algorithms, more data structures but very little concerning the interface
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Wordprocessor) we have this feature. Not because, KWord has a big
development team (it is indeed less numerous than the LyX team) but because
we use the Qtextdocument class which gives us the possibility for regexp
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:10:30PM +, John Levon wrote:
Wherever it makes sense we do use the Qt library for UI, as much as
possible. Unfortunately the Qt library is very much our way or no way
at all in large part... in particular truly separated MVC seems very
hard to do if we use these
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [Off topic, but since you
| possibly know: Is there nowadays a way to move the mouse pointer with
| keyboard only in KDE (i.e. Alt-Right move the pointer 100 pixels to
| the right or similar)? This is about the only feature I need from a
| windowmanager
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 03:56:38PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
I'm going way outside my competence, but the difference between Boost and
Qt/KDE is that Boost seems to me that Boost is a classical library : more
algorithms, more data structures but very little concerning the interface
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Wordprocessor) we have this feature. Not because, KWord has a big
development team (it is indeed less numerous than the LyX team) but because
we use the Qtextdocument class which gives us the possibility for regexp
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:10:30PM +, John Levon wrote:
Wherever it makes sense we do use the Qt library for UI, as much as
possible. Unfortunately the Qt library is very much our way or no way
at all in large part... in particular truly separated MVC seems very
hard to do if we use these
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [Off topic, but since you
| possibly know: Is there nowadays a way to move the mouse pointer with
| keyboard only in KDE (i.e. Alt-Right move the pointer 100 pixels to
| the right or similar)? This is about the only feature I need from a
| windowmanager
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 03:56:38PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> I'm going way outside my competence, but the difference between Boost and
> Qt/KDE is that Boost seems to me that Boost is a classical library : more
> algorithms, more data structures but very little concerning the interface
>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> Wordprocessor) we have this feature. Not because, KWord has a big
> development team (it is indeed less numerous than the LyX team) but because
> we use the Qtextdocument class which gives us the possibility for regexp
>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:10:30PM +, John Levon wrote:
> Wherever it makes sense we do use the Qt library for UI, as much as
> possible. Unfortunately the Qt library is very much "our way or no way
> at all" in large part... in particular truly separated MVC seems very
> hard to do if we use
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| [Off topic, but since you
| possibly know: Is there nowadays a way to move the mouse pointer with
| keyboard only in KDE (i.e. Alt-Right move the pointer 100 pixels to
| the right or similar)? This is about the only feature I need from a
| windowmanager
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[...]
Actually, in 1.3.x and before, if was the mere existence of the find
function which was a difficult task :) The reason was that we had no
easy way to scan through a document, as strange as it may seem.
Now that the find function is in a better shape, adding
I don't think I ever needed to search footnotes specifically, but the
footnotes get searched too - that works for me.
The improved search I'd like to see:
The window where I specify search (and replace) expressions
should be like the main window, in that (almost) anything that goes
in the main
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[...]
Actually, in 1.3.x and before, if was the mere existence of the find
function which was a difficult task :) The reason was that we had no
easy way to scan through a document, as strange as it may seem.
Now that the find function is in a better shape, adding
I don't think I ever needed to search footnotes specifically, but the
footnotes get searched too - that works for me.
The improved search I'd like to see:
The window where I specify search (and replace) expressions
should be like the main window, in that (almost) anything that goes
in the main
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[...]
Actually, in 1.3.x and before, if was the mere existence of the find
function which was a difficult task :) The reason was that we had no
easy way to scan through a document, as strange as it may seem.
Now that the find function is in a better shape, adding
>>I don't think I ever needed to search footnotes specifically, but the
>>footnotes get searched too - that works for me.
>>
>>The improved search I'd like to see:
>>The window where I specify search (and replace) expressions
>>should be like the main window, in that (almost) anything that goes
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text entry
widgets (for search string and replace string) and four buttons: Find
next, Replace, Replace all and Close. I've used it extensively.
Works fine.
I was not talking of ctrl-f but of a powerfull
Charles de Miramon wrote:
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text
entry
widgets (for search string and replace string) and four buttons: Find
next, Replace, Replace all and Close. I've used it extensively.
Works fine.
I was not
Charles == Charles de Miramon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Charles Rich Shepard wrote:
However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text
entry widgets (for search string and replace string) and four
buttons: Find next, Replace, Replace all and Close. I've
used it extensively.
Angus Leeming wrote:
It has also used more and more external libraries. It's just that the
libraries we have chosen to use are primarily those of Boost rather than
of Qt or of KDE or of GTK. LyX 1.4.x is 30% smaller than LyX 1.3.x, both
in terms of executable size and in terms of code that
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/qtextdocument.html
I just had a quick look at this. Unfortunately it's unsuitable. It is
designed as a simple hand over the keys to the car and bring back my
shopping interface. What we need is
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text entry
widgets (for search string and replace string) and four buttons: Find
next, Replace, Replace all and Close. I've used it extensively.
Works fine.
I was not talking of ctrl-f but of a powerfull
Charles de Miramon wrote:
Rich Shepard wrote:
However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text
entry
widgets (for search string and replace string) and four buttons: Find
next, Replace, Replace all and Close. I've used it extensively.
Works fine.
I was not
Charles == Charles de Miramon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Charles Rich Shepard wrote:
However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text
entry widgets (for search string and replace string) and four
buttons: Find next, Replace, Replace all and Close. I've
used it extensively.
Angus Leeming wrote:
It has also used more and more external libraries. It's just that the
libraries we have chosen to use are primarily those of Boost rather than
of Qt or of KDE or of GTK. LyX 1.4.x is 30% smaller than LyX 1.3.x, both
in terms of executable size and in terms of code that
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/qtextdocument.html
I just had a quick look at this. Unfortunately it's unsuitable. It is
designed as a simple hand over the keys to the car and bring back my
shopping interface. What we need is
Rich Shepard wrote:
>However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text entry
> widgets (for search string and replace string) and four buttons: "Find
> next", "Replace", "Replace all" and "Close". I've used it extensively.
> Works fine.
>
I was not talking of ctrl-f but of
Charles de Miramon wrote:
> Rich Shepard wrote:
>
>
>>However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text
>>entry
>> widgets (for search string and replace string) and four buttons: "Find
>> next", "Replace", "Replace all" and "Close". I've used it extensively.
>> Works
> "Charles" == Charles de Miramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> Rich Shepard wrote:
>> However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text
>> entry widgets (for search string and replace string) and four
>> buttons: "Find next", "Replace", "Replace all" and "Close". I've
Angus Leeming wrote:
> It has also used more and more external libraries. It's just that the
> libraries we have chosen to use are primarily those of Boost rather than
> of Qt or of KDE or of GTK. LyX 1.4.x is 30% smaller than LyX 1.3.x, both
> in terms of executable size and in terms of code
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/qtextdocument.html
I just had a quick look at this. Unfortunately it's unsuitable. It is
designed as a simple "hand over the keys to the car and bring back my
shopping" interface. What we need is
In the LyX whine thread (served without cheese, unfortunately) about
missing features someone commented that there is no global search and
replace in 1.3.5.
However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text entry
widgets (for search string and replace string) and four buttons
In the LyX whine thread (served without cheese, unfortunately) about
missing features someone commented that there is no global search and
replace in 1.3.5.
However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text entry
widgets (for search string and replace string) and four buttons
In the LyX whine thread (served without cheese, unfortunately) about
missing features someone commented that there is no global search and
replace in 1.3.5.
However, when I press ctrl-f I see a dialog box that has two text entry
widgets (for search string and replace string) and four buttons
39 matches
Mail list logo
