Pavel,
I didn't know that such a toolbar existed )-)-O More to explore :-)-O
Thank you.
el
On 21/02/2018 17:40, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>> \rcsid{$Id: handbook.lyx,v 1.11 2017/08/12 18:20:59 el Exp $}
>>
>> \newcommand{\versionstring}{v\rcsfilerev,
>> \rcsfileyear-\rcsfil
Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> \rcsid{$Id: handbook.lyx,v 1.11 2017/08/12 18:20:59 el Exp $}
>
> \newcommand{\versionstring}{v\rcsfilerev,
> \rcsfileyear-\rcsfilemonth-\rcsfileday}
>
> suitable for preamble and/or ERT, page styles or watermarks.
Do you know you can do such things natively in LyX?
Ve
As I wrote,
for collaboration RCS is not good enough and I would also not use it.
Whether to use GIT or SVN, I defer to the experts and if GIT is
supported out of the box, so be it :-)-O
But, for my own use on the Mac with Time Machine and Unison (to
synchronize my machines at home and work) RCS
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:12:01 -0800 (PST)
Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2018, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>
> > Maybe one can take the time to look at one of the already existing
> > converters from RCS (CVS?) to SVN/GIT or whatever else LyX can
> > handle, but to be honest, why bother?
>
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
Maybe one can take the time to look at one of the already existing
converters from RCS (CVS?) to SVN/GIT or whatever else LyX can handle, but
to be honest, why bother?
el,
Even as a single user I've found git better suited to my needs than svn.
Rich,
half in jest :-)-O
RCS on an an existing file is better than no version control, or
starting a new version control with different software (on the same
document, and loosing all previous version control).
It also works for single users very well, I have a few documents with
includes all un
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
can you quickly hack up a converter for existing documents?
Eberhard,
I don't understand what you're asking.
When I want to track changes to a document I set up a git repository in
that document's subdirectory, external to lyx. Within LyX I u
Rich,
can you quickly hack up a converter for existing documents?
:-)-O
el
On 17/02/2018 15:40, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2018, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> For the record, it turned out that High Sierra is no more compatible
>> with old RCS binaries (if you manually run co -l file.lyx y
Rich Shepard wrote:
> If subversion, mercurial, or git are available for Macs they are more
> modern than RCS. Have you considered them?
I was solving someone-else's problem, so not my choice.
Anyway, more modern does not mean more appropriate.
RCS is most easy and one does not have to deal wi
On Sat, 17 Feb 2018, Pavel Sanda wrote:
For the record, it turned out that High Sierra is no more compatible with
old RCS binaries (if you manually run co -l file.lyx you get "Illegal
instruction: 4").
Compiling RCS via homebrew fixed the problem.
Pavel,
If subversion, mercurial, or git are
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Busch, Andreas wrote:
> > I use GNU RCS 5.9.0 which appears to be the most recent, on a Mac with High
> > Sierra (10.13.2) and LyX 2.2. Updating to LyX 2.3rc1 made no difference. I
> > am not sure whether the last successful use of rcs with LyX predates
> > upgrading to High
Busch, Andreas wrote:
> I use GNU RCS 5.9.0 which appears to be the most recent, on a Mac with High
> Sierra (10.13.2) and LyX 2.2. Updating to LyX 2.3rc1 made no difference. I am
> not sure whether the last successful use of rcs with LyX predates upgrading
> to High Sierra, otherwise there were
Hi,
for years I have used LyX with version control (GNU rcs) on a number of
documents which I regularly revise. It has proved very useful for that purpose.
Trying to check out one of these documents I ran into trouble yesterday,
however. LyX threw up an unexplained error box indicating that try
13 matches
Mail list logo
