t work, even though it
> now produces no error messages, and it works perfectly (and did for
> years) with normal, non-sectioned bibliographies. I have never tried it
> before with sectioned bibliographies, and there must be something in it
> which the bibtopic package gags on.
> I shall
I forgot to mention that the way in which it fails is that there are ?
where the superscript references should be.
EK
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Also sprach E.Kaplan:
I attach here a small bib file with the required references, and a
corrected Lyx file.
In my hands this still fails.
O
error messages, and it works perfectly (and did for
years) with normal, non-sectioned bibliographies. I have never tried it
before with sectioned bibliographies, and there must be something in it
which the bibtopic package gags on.
I shall continue to explore it. If worse comes to worse, I can
E.Kaplan wrote:
> Sorry, Jurgen, it did not help.Perhaps I did not understand what you
> meant by:
>
> 7. Somewhere in the document, put a bibtex bibliography inside a comment or
> note.
>
> I think I have followed your suggestion exactly, but I am getting
> "undefined control sequence" error f
he \putbib statements.
EK
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Ehud Kaplan wrote:
1. I read the documentation on sectioned bibliographies (an unusual
step!)
Note that this documentation (and LyX's support) is restricted to
bibliographies that are themselves divided into sections
Ehud Kaplan wrote:
>1. I read the documentation on sectioned bibliographies (an unusual
> step!)
Note that this documentation (and LyX's support) is restricted to
bibliographies that are themselves divided into sections (e.g., primary and
secondary literature), whereas you
I am trying to create two bibliographies in one document. Here is what
I did, but it failed:
1. I read the documentation on sectioned bibliographies (an unusual
step!)
2. I made two copies of my master *.bib file, with two different names
3. I checked the "Sectioned bibliograph
