Re: Show footcite as textcite
On 2020-05-02 16:40, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-05-02 16:29, Daniel wrote:
Hi,
Are there any Biblatex wizzards on the list?
I want the \autocite(s) (that I have set to footnotes) to show the
same format as the \textcite(s) commands.
I can easily do
\let\autocite\textcite
\let\autocites\textcites
But that doesn't accomplish what I want because I want them to still
produce footnotes. So, I guess I will have to redefine the autocite
commands with something like
\renewcommand{\autocite}[2]{\textcite[#2]{#1}].}
\renewcommand{\autocites}[2]{\textcites[#2]{#1}].}
Would that in principle work? Does anyone know where to find the
proper definition of the *cite commands in question so that I can get
the definition right concerning number of optional arguments and such?
Why do I want this? I am using also textcite in the text, so it just
seems natural to me to use the same format in footnotes that can also
have little texts. And I don't have any style guides to satisfy. So, I
just wanted it to look consistent.
Best,
Daniel
I tried my luck on stack but without success:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/539227/how-to-make-footcite-look-like-textcite-with-biblatex
Daniel
I managed to get a reply for this on stack.
Daniel
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Show footcite as textcite
On 2020-05-02 16:29, Daniel wrote:
Hi,
Are there any Biblatex wizzards on the list?
I want the \autocite(s) (that I have set to footnotes) to show the same
format as the \textcite(s) commands.
I can easily do
\let\autocite\textcite
\let\autocites\textcites
But that doesn't accomplish what I want because I want them to still
produce footnotes. So, I guess I will have to redefine the autocite
commands with something like
\renewcommand{\autocite}[2]{\textcite[#2]{#1}].}
\renewcommand{\autocites}[2]{\textcites[#2]{#1}].}
Would that in principle work? Does anyone know where to find the proper
definition of the *cite commands in question so that I can get the
definition right concerning number of optional arguments and such?
Why do I want this? I am using also textcite in the text, so it just
seems natural to me to use the same format in footnotes that can also
have little texts. And I don't have any style guides to satisfy. So, I
just wanted it to look consistent.
Best,
Daniel
I tried my luck on stack but without success:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/539227/how-to-make-footcite-look-like-textcite-with-biblatex
Daniel
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Show footcite as textcite
Hi,
Are there any Biblatex wizzards on the list?
I want the \autocite(s) (that I have set to footnotes) to show the same
format as the \textcite(s) commands.
I can easily do
\let\autocite\textcite
\let\autocites\textcites
But that doesn't accomplish what I want because I want them to still
produce footnotes. So, I guess I will have to redefine the autocite
commands with something like
\renewcommand{\autocite}[2]{\textcite[#2]{#1}].}
\renewcommand{\autocites}[2]{\textcites[#2]{#1}].}
Would that in principle work? Does anyone know where to find the proper
definition of the *cite commands in question so that I can get the
definition right concerning number of optional arguments and such?
Why do I want this? I am using also textcite in the text, so it just
seems natural to me to use the same format in footnotes that can also
have little texts. And I don't have any style guides to satisfy. So, I
just wanted it to look consistent.
Best,
Daniel
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
