On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:25, Steve Litt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know what I am talking about (you have been warned) but should not
this be
\renewcommand{\maketitle}{%
?
After all \maketitle is already defined.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 15 June 2006 06:06 am, Jose' Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:25, Steve Litt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know what I am talking about (you have been warned) but should not
this be
\renewcommand{\maketitle}{%
?
After all \maketitle is already defined.
Hi
There's a difference here between \maketitle and [EMAIL PROTECTED], at least
if you're modifying one of the existing classes. The former is defined
using \newcommand, but the latter is defined using \def. It'd be nice if
someone could explain why.
Richard
Steve Litt wrote:
On Thursday 15 June
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:25, Steve Litt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know what I am talking about (you have been warned) but should not
this be
\renewcommand{\maketitle}{%
?
After all \maketitle is already defined.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 15 June 2006 06:06 am, Jose' Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:25, Steve Litt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know what I am talking about (you have been warned) but should not
this be
\renewcommand{\maketitle}{%
?
After all \maketitle is already defined.
Hi
There's a difference here between \maketitle and [EMAIL PROTECTED], at least
if you're modifying one of the existing classes. The former is defined
using \newcommand, but the latter is defined using \def. It'd be nice if
someone could explain why.
Richard
Steve Litt wrote:
On Thursday 15 June
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:25, Steve Litt wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know what I am talking about (you have been warned) but should not
this be
\renewcommand{\maketitle}{%
?
After all \maketitle is already defined.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 15 June 2006 06:06 am, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:25, Steve Litt wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I don't know what I am talking about (you have been warned) but should not
> this be
>
> \renewcommand{\maketitle}{%
> ?
>
> After all \maketitle is already
There's a difference here between \maketitle and [EMAIL PROTECTED], at least
if you're modifying one of the existing classes. The former is defined
using \newcommand, but the latter is defined using \def. It'd be nice if
someone could explain why.
Richard
Steve Litt wrote:
> On Thursday 15 June
Steve Litt wrote:
If you notice, most modern books have two lines to their title, as in:
===
Guide to LaTeX
Tools and Techniques for Computer Typesetting
===
Try this one. Basically it means redefinition of [EMAIL PROTECTED] like this
Hi Matej,
Looks good from a casual read, and I'll try this, but your email brings up a
much more serious topic -- *how the heck did you learn this???*
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX, because I
read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX, because I
read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few sentences on
the use of the \let TeX primative.
Steve,
Have you read Knuth's TeXbook?
Rich
--
Richard B.
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 18:47, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi Matej,
Looks good from a casual read, and I'll try this, but your email brings up
a much more serious topic -- *how the heck did you learn this???*
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX, because I
read that book
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 01:50 pm, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX, because
I read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few
sentences on the use of the \let TeX primative.
Steve,
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 01:55 pm, Jose' Matos wrote:
At least for me LaTeX tips and tricks is always a nice place to start.
Thanks Jose,
Are you referring to http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi/?
SteveT
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 19:12, Steve Litt wrote:
Are you referring to http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi/?
Yes.
Since I am lazy I always go first to http://lyx.org and from there to
Herbert's site. :-)
SteveT
--
José Abílio
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
Not yet. Is it good?
Steve,
I like it.
Is it hugely confusing?
That's subjective. I read his series, The Art of Computer Programming, in
the mid-1970s just to learn how to be a better FORTRAN coder. Quite readable.
I've not yet bought the
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX,
because I
read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few
sentences on
the use of the \let TeX primative.
Steve,
Have you read Knuth's TeXbook?
Rich
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 09:34 am, Matej Cepl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@empty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\newpage
\null
\vskip 2em%
\begin{center}%
\let \footnote \thanks
{\LARGE \bfseries [EMAIL PROTECTED] \par}%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@empty
\else
[EMAIL
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Stephen Harris wrote:
The book is available for download at
http://www.yunnan.tk/component/option,com_docman/task,cat_view/gid,34/Itemid,78/
Stephen,
Once upon a time I had a copy. For whatever reason, it's no longer on my
hard drive. Thank you for the reminder.
Rich
Steve Litt wrote:
If you notice, most modern books have two lines to their title, as in:
===
Guide to LaTeX
Tools and Techniques for Computer Typesetting
===
Try this one. Basically it means redefinition of [EMAIL PROTECTED] like this
Hi Matej,
Looks good from a casual read, and I'll try this, but your email brings up a
much more serious topic -- *how the heck did you learn this???*
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX, because I
read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX, because I
read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few sentences on
the use of the \let TeX primative.
Steve,
Have you read Knuth's TeXbook?
Rich
--
Richard B.
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 18:47, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi Matej,
Looks good from a casual read, and I'll try this, but your email brings up
a much more serious topic -- *how the heck did you learn this???*
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX, because I
read that book
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 01:50 pm, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX, because
I read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few
sentences on the use of the \let TeX primative.
Steve,
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 01:55 pm, Jose' Matos wrote:
At least for me LaTeX tips and tricks is always a nice place to start.
Thanks Jose,
Are you referring to http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi/?
SteveT
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 19:12, Steve Litt wrote:
Are you referring to http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi/?
Yes.
Since I am lazy I always go first to http://lyx.org and from there to
Herbert's site. :-)
SteveT
--
José Abílio
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
Not yet. Is it good?
Steve,
I like it.
Is it hugely confusing?
That's subjective. I read his series, The Art of Computer Programming, in
the mid-1970s just to learn how to be a better FORTRAN coder. Quite readable.
I've not yet bought the
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's Guide to LaTeX,
because I
read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few
sentences on
the use of the \let TeX primative.
Steve,
Have you read Knuth's TeXbook?
Rich
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 09:34 am, Matej Cepl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@empty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\newpage
\null
\vskip 2em%
\begin{center}%
\let \footnote \thanks
{\LARGE \bfseries [EMAIL PROTECTED] \par}%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@empty
\else
[EMAIL
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Stephen Harris wrote:
The book is available for download at
http://www.yunnan.tk/component/option,com_docman/task,cat_view/gid,34/Itemid,78/
Stephen,
Once upon a time I had a copy. For whatever reason, it's no longer on my
hard drive. Thank you for the reminder.
Rich
Steve Litt wrote:
> If you notice, most modern books have two lines to their title, as in:
>
> ===
> Guide to LaTeX
> Tools and Techniques for Computer Typesetting
> ===
Try this one. Basically it means redefinition of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Matej,
Looks good from a casual read, and I'll try this, but your email brings up a
much more serious topic -- *how the heck did you learn this???*
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's "Guide to LaTeX", because I
read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's "Guide to LaTeX", because I
read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few sentences on
the use of the \let TeX primative.
Steve,
Have you read Knuth's "TeXbook?"
Rich
--
Richard B.
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 18:47, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi Matej,
>
> Looks good from a casual read, and I'll try this, but your email brings up
> a much more serious topic -- *how the heck did you learn this???*
>
> I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's "Guide to LaTeX", because I
> read
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 01:50 pm, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
> > I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's "Guide to LaTeX", because
> > I read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few
> > sentences on the use of the \let TeX primative.
>
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 01:55 pm, Jose' Matos wrote:
> At least for me "LaTeX tips and tricks" is always a nice place to start.
Thanks Jose,
Are you referring to http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi/?
SteveT
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 19:12, Steve Litt wrote:
> Are you referring to http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi/?
Yes.
Since I am lazy I always go first to http://lyx.org and from there to
Herbert's site. :-)
> SteveT
--
José Abílio
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
Not yet. Is it good?
Steve,
I like it.
Is it hugely confusing?
That's subjective. I read his series, "The Art of Computer Programming," in
the mid-1970s just to learn how to be a better FORTRAN coder. Quite readable.
I've not yet bought the
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
I know you didn't learn it in Kopka and Daly's "Guide to LaTeX",
because I
read that book cover to cover and there were no more than a few
sentences on
the use of the \let TeX primative.
Steve,
Have you read Knuth's "TeXbook?"
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 09:34 am, Matej Cepl wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@empty
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> \newpage
> \null
> \vskip 2em%
> \begin{center}%
> \let \footnote \thanks
> {\LARGE \bfseries [EMAIL PROTECTED] \par}%
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@empty
> \else
>
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Stephen Harris wrote:
The book is available for download at
http://www.yunnan.tk/component/option,com_docman/task,cat_view/gid,34/Itemid,78/
Stephen,
Once upon a time I had a copy. For whatever reason, it's no longer on my
hard drive. Thank you for the reminder.
Rich
Hi all,
If you notice, most modern books have two lines to their title, as in:
===
Guide to LaTeX
Tools and Techniques for Computer Typesetting
===
or
===
The Cathedral the Bazaar
Musings on Linux and Open
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
Typically, the subtitle is longer than the title and therefore is printed in a
smaller font. What I'd like to do is have them both on the title page.
I'm using my own derivative of the Book environment for this project.
SteveT,
Consider deriving
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 05:40 pm, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
Typically, the subtitle is longer than the title and therefore is printed
in a smaller font. What I'd like to do is have them both on the title
page.
I'm using my own derivative of the Book
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
I could revisit that decision, but I've already got a layout that's a
derivative of Book, so I'd like to have a lot more reasons to go Koma than
just the title page. If the only benefit is just the title page, I'd rather
fine tune the title page with
Hi all,
If you notice, most modern books have two lines to their title, as in:
===
Guide to LaTeX
Tools and Techniques for Computer Typesetting
===
or
===
The Cathedral the Bazaar
Musings on Linux and Open
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
Typically, the subtitle is longer than the title and therefore is printed in a
smaller font. What I'd like to do is have them both on the title page.
I'm using my own derivative of the Book environment for this project.
SteveT,
Consider deriving
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 05:40 pm, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
Typically, the subtitle is longer than the title and therefore is printed
in a smaller font. What I'd like to do is have them both on the title
page.
I'm using my own derivative of the Book
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
I could revisit that decision, but I've already got a layout that's a
derivative of Book, so I'd like to have a lot more reasons to go Koma than
just the title page. If the only benefit is just the title page, I'd rather
fine tune the title page with
Hi all,
If you notice, most modern books have two lines to their title, as in:
===
Guide to LaTeX
Tools and Techniques for Computer Typesetting
===
or
===
The Cathedral & the Bazaar
Musings on Linux and Open
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
Typically, the subtitle is longer than the title and therefore is printed in a
smaller font. What I'd like to do is have them both on the title page.
I'm using my own derivative of the Book environment for this project.
SteveT,
Consider deriving
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 05:40 pm, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
> > Typically, the subtitle is longer than the title and therefore is printed
> > in a smaller font. What I'd like to do is have them both on the title
> > page.
> >
> > I'm using my own derivative of
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Steve Litt wrote:
I could revisit that decision, but I've already got a layout that's a
derivative of Book, so I'd like to have a lot more reasons to go Koma than
just the title page. If the only benefit is just the title page, I'd rather
fine tune the title page with
54 matches
Mail list logo
