Heiko Schröder wrote:
Writing a single German diphtong goes well with LyX. But if you
load the same TeX-File in vim 7.0, substitute that letter with an
ASCII-sign, save the file and open again with vim to get the old German
letter back, then the latex-dance failes with that annyoing problem,
Heiko Schröder wrote:
Writing a single German diphtong goes well with LyX. But if you
load the same TeX-File in vim 7.0, substitute that letter with an
ASCII-sign, save the file and open again with vim to get the old German
letter back, then the latex-dance failes with that annyoing problem,
Heiko Schröder wrote:
> Writing a single German diphtong goes well with LyX. But if you
> load the same TeX-File in vim 7.0, substitute that letter with an
> ASCII-sign, save the file and open again with vim to get the old German
> letter back, then the latex-dance failes with that annyoing
Dear list,
browsing down the recent mails of the archive, I found that a lot of users
found themselves vaced to that disgusting problem which occurs with the
*inputenc* package, although it sureley has nothing to do with the package
itself. Writing a single German diphtong goes well with LyX.
Dear list,
browsing down the recent mails of the archive, I found that a lot of users
found themselves vaced to that disgusting problem which occurs with the
*inputenc* package, although it sureley has nothing to do with the package
itself. Writing a single German diphtong goes well with LyX.
Dear list,
browsing down the recent mails of the archive, I found that a lot of users
found themselves vaced to that disgusting problem which occurs with the
*inputenc* package, although it sureley has nothing to do with the package
itself. Writing a single German diphtong goes well with LyX.
