i have stumpled upon this ugly bibtex record, which causes peculiar
behaviour.
the article entry below does not contain the mandatory author field, and
this causes strange things to happen in lyx 1.3.6 using natbib numerical -
the citation menu goes fubar.
can someone confirm this?
shouldnt the
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
i have stumpled upon this ugly bibtex record, which causes peculiar
behaviour.
the article entry below does not contain the mandatory author field, and
this causes strange things to happen in lyx 1.3.6 using natbib numerical
-
the question is if the bibtex parser should be smart?
actually, iirc bibtool provides a nice API - why doesnt lyx use the bibtool
libs and API?
martin
On 25/01/06, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
i have stumpled upon this
btw,
bibtex syntax may seem stupid, but it is extremely flexible, which is needed
in a typographic world, where there are very limited use of any standards.
martin
On 25/01/06, Martin A. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the question is if the bibtex parser should be smart?
actually, iirc
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 21:41 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
the question is if the bibtex parser should be smart?
No, an external parser written by BibTeX experts would be preferable IMO.
actually, iirc bibtool provides a nice API - why doesnt lyx use the
bibtool
libs and API?
The API is
have anyone contacted the author of bibtool. i think i saw his homepage at
some point - he seems to be quite a geeky fellow doing nothing but
latex/bibtex by the look of his publications/talks - perhaps he could be
moved to adapt the api to work with stdin instead of some file?
and if not - well,
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 21:24 schrieb Georg Baum:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
i have stumpled upon this ugly bibtex record, which causes peculiar
behaviour.
the article entry below does not contain the mandatory author field, and
this causes strange
try here
http://www.gerd-neugebauer.de/software/TeX/BibTool.en.html
(pølsetysker :o)
martin
On 25/01/06, Wolfgang Engelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 21:24 schrieb Georg Baum:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
i have stumpled
i have stumpled upon this ugly bibtex record, which causes peculiar
behaviour.
the article entry below does not contain the mandatory author field, and
this causes strange things to happen in lyx 1.3.6 using natbib numerical -
the citation menu goes fubar.
can someone confirm this?
shouldnt the
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
i have stumpled upon this ugly bibtex record, which causes peculiar
behaviour.
the article entry below does not contain the mandatory author field, and
this causes strange things to happen in lyx 1.3.6 using natbib numerical
-
the question is if the bibtex parser should be smart?
actually, iirc bibtool provides a nice API - why doesnt lyx use the bibtool
libs and API?
martin
On 25/01/06, Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
i have stumpled upon this
btw,
bibtex syntax may seem stupid, but it is extremely flexible, which is needed
in a typographic world, where there are very limited use of any standards.
martin
On 25/01/06, Martin A. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the question is if the bibtex parser should be smart?
actually, iirc
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 21:41 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
the question is if the bibtex parser should be smart?
No, an external parser written by BibTeX experts would be preferable IMO.
actually, iirc bibtool provides a nice API - why doesnt lyx use the
bibtool
libs and API?
The API is
have anyone contacted the author of bibtool. i think i saw his homepage at
some point - he seems to be quite a geeky fellow doing nothing but
latex/bibtex by the look of his publications/talks - perhaps he could be
moved to adapt the api to work with stdin instead of some file?
and if not - well,
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 21:24 schrieb Georg Baum:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
i have stumpled upon this ugly bibtex record, which causes peculiar
behaviour.
the article entry below does not contain the mandatory author field, and
this causes strange
try here
http://www.gerd-neugebauer.de/software/TeX/BibTool.en.html
(pølsetysker :o)
martin
On 25/01/06, Wolfgang Engelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 21:24 schrieb Georg Baum:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
i have stumpled
i have stumpled upon this ugly bibtex record, which causes peculiar
behaviour.
the article entry below does not contain the mandatory author field, and
this causes strange things to happen in lyx 1.3.6 using natbib numerical ->
the citation menu goes fubar.
can someone confirm this?
shouldnt
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
> i have stumpled upon this ugly bibtex record, which causes peculiar
> behaviour.
>
> the article entry below does not contain the mandatory author field, and
> this causes strange things to happen in lyx 1.3.6 using natbib numerical
the question is if the bibtex parser should be "smart"?
actually, iirc bibtool provides a nice API - why doesnt lyx use the bibtool
libs and API?
martin
On 25/01/06, Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
> > i have stumpled
btw,
bibtex syntax may seem stupid, but it is extremely flexible, which is needed
in a typographic world, where there are very limited use of any standards.
martin
On 25/01/06, Martin A. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the question is if the bibtex parser should be "smart"?
>
>
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 21:41 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
> the question is if the bibtex parser should be "smart"?
No, an external parser written by BibTeX experts would be preferable IMO.
> actually, iirc bibtool provides a nice API - why doesnt lyx use the
bibtool
> libs and API?
The API
have anyone contacted the author of bibtool. i think i saw his homepage at
some point - he seems to be quite a geeky fellow doing nothing but
latex/bibtex by the look of his publications/talks - perhaps he could be
moved to adapt the api to work with stdin instead of some file?
and if not - well,
Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 21:24 schrieb Georg Baum:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
> > i have stumpled upon this ugly bibtex record, which causes peculiar
> > behaviour.
> >
> > the article entry below does not contain the mandatory author field, and
> > this
try here
http://www.gerd-neugebauer.de/software/TeX/BibTool.en.html
(pølsetysker :o)
martin
On 25/01/06, Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 21:24 schrieb Georg Baum:
> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 20:19 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
> > > i have
24 matches
Mail list logo
