Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:24:34AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote:
I am facing one problem, when I am in mathmode, if I type
left (single) curly braces, it gives me both (left and
right) and if I try for only right one, it does nothing. Has
anyone also experienced the same and what is the solution.
Type \{ for a left, \} for a right curly brace.
Typing { gives you a nested block.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:24:34AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote:
I am facing one problem, when I am in mathmode, if I type
left (single) curly braces, it gives me both (left and
right) and if I try for only right one, it does nothing. Has
anyone also experienced the same and what is the solution.
Type \{ for a left, \} for a right curly brace.
Typing { gives you a nested block.
Thanks very much.
Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent
releases.
Regards
S K Tomar
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:36:47AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote: Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent releases. I am not sure. On the 'pro' side: It behaves exactly as LaTeX does, whence it is easy to implement. On the 'contra' side: It is somewhat annoying and people who don't know LaTeX certainly do not appreciate it. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote: Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent releases. I am not sure. On the 'pro' side: It behaves exactly as LaTeX does, whence it is easy to implement. On the 'contra' side: It is somewhat annoying and people who don't know LaTeX certainly do not appreciate it. Then it should behave in a similar fashion for \(, \), \[, \] but we don't require \ before any of these, in fact if we do add, it gives error. Regards S K Tomar
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:24:34AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote:
I am facing one problem, when I am in mathmode, if I type
left (single) curly braces, it gives me both (left and
right) and if I try for only right one, it does nothing. Has
anyone also experienced the same and what is the solution.
Type \{ for a left, \} for a right curly brace.
Typing { gives you a nested block.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:24:34AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote:
I am facing one problem, when I am in mathmode, if I type
left (single) curly braces, it gives me both (left and
right) and if I try for only right one, it does nothing. Has
anyone also experienced the same and what is the solution.
Type \{ for a left, \} for a right curly brace.
Typing { gives you a nested block.
Thanks very much.
Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent
releases.
Regards
S K Tomar
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:36:47AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote: Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent releases. I am not sure. On the 'pro' side: It behaves exactly as LaTeX does, whence it is easy to implement. On the 'contra' side: It is somewhat annoying and people who don't know LaTeX certainly do not appreciate it. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote: Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent releases. I am not sure. On the 'pro' side: It behaves exactly as LaTeX does, whence it is easy to implement. On the 'contra' side: It is somewhat annoying and people who don't know LaTeX certainly do not appreciate it. Then it should behave in a similar fashion for \(, \), \[, \] but we don't require \ before any of these, in fact if we do add, it gives error. Regards S K Tomar
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:24:34AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote:
> I am facing one problem, when I am in mathmode, if I type
> left (single) curly braces, it gives me both (left and
> right) and if I try for only right one, it does nothing. Has
> anyone also experienced the same and what is the solution.
Type \{ for a left, \} for a right curly brace.
Typing { gives you a nested block.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:24:34AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote:
> > I am facing one problem, when I am in mathmode, if I type
> > left (single) curly braces, it gives me both (left and
> > right) and if I try for only right one, it does nothing. Has
> > anyone also experienced the same and what is the solution.
>
> Type \{ for a left, \} for a right curly brace.
> Typing { gives you a nested block.
Thanks very much.
Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent
releases.
Regards
S K Tomar
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:36:47AM +0200, S.K. Tomar wrote: > Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent > releases. I am not sure. On the 'pro' side: It behaves exactly as LaTeX does, whence it is easy to implement. On the 'contra' side: It is somewhat annoying and people who don't know LaTeX certainly do not appreciate it. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: curly braces in 1.2.0
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Just one query, will this feature be same in subsequent > > releases. > > I am not sure. > > On the 'pro' side: It behaves exactly as LaTeX does, whence it is > easy to implement. > > On the 'contra' side: It is somewhat annoying and people who don't > know LaTeX certainly do not appreciate it. Then it should behave in a similar fashion for \(, \), \[, \] but we don't require "\" before any of these, in fact if we do add, it gives error. Regards S K Tomar
