On 19.06.2016 12:36, racoon wrote:
On 19.06.2016 12:31, racoon wrote:
On 17.06.2016 21:33, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 17/06/2016 18:40, Kiuhnm a écrit :
Hello,
I wrote a document in Lyx 2.2 and I noticed that I had added extra
empty
lines before displaymath elements all over the document
On 19.06.2016 12:31, racoon wrote:
On 17.06.2016 21:33, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 17/06/2016 18:40, Kiuhnm a écrit :
Hello,
I wrote a document in Lyx 2.2 and I noticed that I had added extra empty
lines before displaymath elements all over the document.
This happens when one hits return
On 17.06.2016 21:33, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 17/06/2016 18:40, Kiuhnm a écrit :
Hello,
I wrote a document in Lyx 2.2 and I noticed that I had added extra empty
lines before displaymath elements all over the document.
This happens when one hits return before pressing Ctrl+Shift+M. Did
Le 17/06/2016 18:40, Kiuhnm a écrit :
Hello,
I wrote a document in Lyx 2.2 and I noticed that I had added extra empty
lines before displaymath elements all over the document.
This happens when one hits return before pressing Ctrl+Shift+M. Did this
happen in Lyx 2.1.4 too? I never noticed
Hello,
I wrote a document in Lyx 2.2 and I noticed that I had added extra empty
lines before displaymath elements all over the document.
This happens when one hits return before pressing Ctrl+Shift+M. Did this
happen in Lyx 2.1.4 too? I never noticed. Should this behavior be
considered
Dear LyX users and developers,
It occurs to me that when I am entering display math at a point where the LyX
window has nothing to show below (at the bottom of your screen), leaving the
display-math takes me back to part before the display-math (instead of moving
forward). This problem does not
Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
Dear LyX users and developers,
It occurs to me that when I am entering display math at a point where the LyX
window has nothing to show below (at the bottom of your screen), leaving the
display-math takes me back to part before the display-math (instead of moving
forward).
On 30/10/2008 18:33, rgheck wrote:
Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
Dear LyX users and developers,
It occurs to me that when I am entering display math at a point where
the LyX
window has nothing to show below (at the bottom of your screen),
leaving the
display-math takes me back to part before the
rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand what you mean, but I don't see this problem. If I create a
new document, type Hi there, Ctrl-Shift-M for display math, enter x,
then hit space, I am behind the inset, and if I now type Hi again,
it's on the next line.
rh
Your
Mukhtar Ullah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your reply suggests that I have been unable to explain properly.
When you start a new document, type Hi there, and start display math,
LyX can accomodate the new stuff you write on the screen.
Try to type some more text until you are at the bottom of
On 30/10/2008 18:40, Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
rgheck[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand what you mean, but I don't see this problem. If I create a
new document, type Hi there, Ctrl-Shift-M for display math, enter x,
then hit space, I am behind the inset, and if I now type Hi again,
it's on
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 18:57 +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Your reply suggests that I have been unable to explain properly.
When you start a new document, type Hi there, and start display
math,
LyX can accomodate the new stuff you write on the screen.
Try to type some more text until
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can reproduce this bug. Could you please put it in bugzilla.lyx.org ?
Thanks,
Abdel.
Abdel,
Thanks for confirimg the bug. I have put the bug as Bug 5433 in bugzilla. I hope
the developers get my point.
Mukhtar
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Let me add to this that if you have your math toolbars at the bottom of
the screen, and if you insert or enter a math inset, the auto-appearing
math toolbars will block the math you wanted to edit. The screen is
moved up when you press any key, but it is annoying
Dear LyX users and developers,
It occurs to me that when I am entering display math at a point where the LyX
window has nothing to show below (at the bottom of your screen), leaving the
display-math takes me back to part before the display-math (instead of moving
forward). This problem does not
Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
Dear LyX users and developers,
It occurs to me that when I am entering display math at a point where the LyX
window has nothing to show below (at the bottom of your screen), leaving the
display-math takes me back to part before the display-math (instead of moving
forward).
On 30/10/2008 18:33, rgheck wrote:
Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
Dear LyX users and developers,
It occurs to me that when I am entering display math at a point where
the LyX
window has nothing to show below (at the bottom of your screen),
leaving the
display-math takes me back to part before the
rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand what you mean, but I don't see this problem. If I create a
new document, type Hi there, Ctrl-Shift-M for display math, enter x,
then hit space, I am behind the inset, and if I now type Hi again,
it's on the next line.
rh
Your
Mukhtar Ullah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your reply suggests that I have been unable to explain properly.
When you start a new document, type Hi there, and start display math,
LyX can accomodate the new stuff you write on the screen.
Try to type some more text until you are at the bottom of
On 30/10/2008 18:40, Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
rgheck[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand what you mean, but I don't see this problem. If I create a
new document, type Hi there, Ctrl-Shift-M for display math, enter x,
then hit space, I am behind the inset, and if I now type Hi again,
it's on
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 18:57 +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Your reply suggests that I have been unable to explain properly.
When you start a new document, type Hi there, and start display
math,
LyX can accomodate the new stuff you write on the screen.
Try to type some more text until
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can reproduce this bug. Could you please put it in bugzilla.lyx.org ?
Thanks,
Abdel.
Abdel,
Thanks for confirimg the bug. I have put the bug as Bug 5433 in bugzilla. I hope
the developers get my point.
Mukhtar
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Let me add to this that if you have your math toolbars at the bottom of
the screen, and if you insert or enter a math inset, the auto-appearing
math toolbars will block the math you wanted to edit. The screen is
moved up when you press any key, but it is annoying
Dear LyX users and developers,
It occurs to me that when I am entering display math at a point where the LyX
window has nothing to show below (at the bottom of your screen), leaving the
display-math takes me back to part before the display-math (instead of moving
forward). This problem does not
Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
Dear LyX users and developers,
It occurs to me that when I am entering display math at a point where the LyX
window has nothing to show below (at the bottom of your screen), leaving the
display-math takes me back to part before the display-math (instead of moving
forward).
On 30/10/2008 18:33, rgheck wrote:
Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
Dear LyX users and developers,
It occurs to me that when I am entering display math at a point where
the LyX
window has nothing to show below (at the bottom of your screen),
leaving the
display-math takes me back to part before the
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> I understand what you mean, but I don't see this problem. If I create a
> new document, type "Hi there", Ctrl-Shift-M for display math, enter x,
> then hit space, I am behind the inset, and if I now type "Hi again",
> it's on the next line.
>
> rh
Mukhtar Ullah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your reply suggests that I have been unable to explain properly.
> When you start a new document, type "Hi there", and start display math,
> LyX can accomodate the new stuff you write on the screen.
> Try to type some more text until you are at the
On 30/10/2008 18:40, Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
rgheck<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I understand what you mean, but I don't see this problem. If I create a
new document, type "Hi there", Ctrl-Shift-M for display math, enter x,
then hit space, I am behind the inset, and if I now type "Hi again",
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 18:57 +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Your reply suggests that I have been unable to explain properly.
> > When you start a new document, type "Hi there", and start display
> math,
> > LyX can accomodate the new stuff you write on the screen.
> > Try to type some more
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I can reproduce this bug. Could you please put it in bugzilla.lyx.org ?
>
> Thanks,
> Abdel.
>
Abdel,
Thanks for confirimg the bug. I have put the bug as Bug 5433 in bugzilla. I hope
the developers get my point.
Mukhtar
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Let me add to this that if you have your math toolbars at the bottom of
the screen, and if you insert or enter a math inset, the auto-appearing
math toolbars will block the math you wanted to edit. The screen is
moved up when you press any key, but it is annoying
Yes, but this is apparently somewhat complicated if you really want to
get it right. It's covered in section 8.2.10 of /The Latex Companion/.
Richard
Robert Neumann wrote:
hello,
is there a way to change the vertical distance before and after a
mathematical
formula in the displaymath-mode
Yes, but this is apparently somewhat complicated if you really want to
get it right. It's covered in section 8.2.10 of /The Latex Companion/.
Richard
Robert Neumann wrote:
hello,
is there a way to change the vertical distance before and after a
mathematical
formula in the displaymath-mode
Yes, but this is apparently somewhat complicated if you really want to
get it right. It's covered in section 8.2.10 of /The Latex Companion/.
Richard
Robert Neumann wrote:
> hello,
> is there a way to change the vertical distance before and after a
> mathematical
> formula in the
hello,
is there a way to change the vertical distance before and after a mathematical
formula in the displaymath-mode. I would like to have it a bit smaller but
for the whole document.
thanks!
robert
hello,
is there a way to change the vertical distance before and after a mathematical
formula in the displaymath-mode. I would like to have it a bit smaller but
for the whole document.
thanks!
robert
hello,
is there a way to change the vertical distance before and after a mathematical
formula in the displaymath-mode. I would like to have it a bit smaller but
for the whole document.
thanks!
robert
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was possible, for a
few equations only, to have this environment to be left aligned rather than the
default centered.
Geoff
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was possible, for a few equations only, to have this environment to be left aligned rather than the default centered.
Geoff
In Layout-Document-Packages, check the box to use the amsmath package
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was
possible, for a few equations only, to have this environment to be
left aligned rather than the default centered.
Geoff
In Layout-Document-Packages, check the box to use
@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: displaymath
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was possible,
for a few equations only, to have this environment to be left aligned
rather than the default
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was possible, for a
few equations only, to have this environment to be left aligned rather than the
default centered.
Geoff
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was possible, for a few equations only, to have this environment to be left aligned rather than the default centered.
Geoff
In Layout-Document-Packages, check the box to use the amsmath package
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was
possible, for a few equations only, to have this environment to be
left aligned rather than the default centered.
Geoff
In Layout-Document-Packages, check the box to use
@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: displaymath
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was possible,
for a few equations only, to have this environment to be left aligned
rather than the default
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was possible, for a
few equations only, to have this environment to be left aligned rather than the
default centered.
Geoff
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was possible, for a few equations only, to have this environment to be left aligned rather than the default centered.
Geoff
In Layout->Document->Packages, check the box to use the amsmath p
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was
possible, for a few equations only, to have this environment to be
left aligned rather than the default centered.
Geoff
In Layout->Document->Packages, check the box
D]>
To: <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: displaymath
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
Hi
I am using displaymath environment and wondered whether it was possible,
for a few equations only, to have this environment to be lef
Myriam Abramson wrote:
The equations in displaymath (each one on a separate line) seem
to use too much space in between them. How can I control that?
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/matharray/matharray.html#space
Herbert
--
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Myriam Abramson wrote:
The equations in displaymath (each one on a separate line) seem
to use too much space in between them. How can I control that?
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/matharray/matharray.html#space
Herbert
--
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Myriam Abramson wrote:
>
> The equations in displaymath (each one on a separate line) seem
> to use too much space in between them. How can I control that?
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/matharray/matharray.html#space
Herbert
--
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
The equations in displaymath (each one on a separate line) seem
to use too much space in between them. How can I control that?
Thanks,
--
myriam
Go Proverb:
Play slow, win slow; play fast, lose fast.
Hi!
The equations in displaymath (each one on a separate line) seem
to use too much space in between them. How can I control that?
Thanks,
--
myriam
Go Proverb:
Play slow, win slow; play fast, lose fast.
Hi!
The equations in displaymath (each one on a separate line) seem
to use too much space in between them. How can I control that?
Thanks,
--
myriam
Go Proverb:
Play slow, win slow; play fast, lose fast.
"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From the Revtex docs (3.1, but I doubt they've changed):
Amir "The most common (and preferred) type of displayed equation in
Amir The APS Journals in a *single-line equation, with an equation
Amir number on the same line*. Try to set as many
"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From the Revtex docs (3.1, but I doubt they've changed):
Amir "The most common (and preferred) type of displayed equation in
Amir The APS Journals in a *single-line equation, with an equation
Amir number on the same line*. Try to set as many
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From the Revtex docs (3.1, but I doubt they've changed):
Amir> "The most common (and preferred) type of displayed equation in
Amir> The APS Journals in a *single-line equation, with an equation
Amir> number on the same line*. Try to set
"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Amir Dumb question. Do I have to type math-number in the minibuffer
Amir for every single equation in my whole document? (Or use a perl
Amir script to change \[ to \begin{equation}?) I can't imagine that's
Amir the case. I know a bunch of people
ter all.
Nonetheless, there ought to be a command corresponding binding that
automatically opens an equation instead of a displaymath
(e.g., "M-m e" = "M-m d" + "M-m n"). Of course I ought to do it myself. I
guess I'm just too lazy. But if Dekel is working on
math.bind and found out I
Amir can use "M-m n" to number an equation, so it's not so painful
Amir after all. Nonetheless, there ought to be a command
Amir corresponding binding that automatically opens an equation
Amir instead of a displaymath (e.g., "M-m e" = "M-m d"
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 04:34:21PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why would you like to number every single equation when you will not
refer to them? Just for the pleasure to have an equation numbered
(4.5.103)? I even wrote a packages
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:55:13 -0500
From: Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lyx Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: displaymath vs. equation
While we're at it, Customization has a *very* short description of the bind
files. (It says to look at the bind files to see how they work
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 05:31:40PM +0100, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
While we're at it, Customization has a *very* short description of the bind
files. (It says to look at the bind files to see how they work.) For
example, how do I know what ~S means in a bind file? Or is there another doc
"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Amir Dumb question. Do I have to type math-number in the minibuffer
Amir for every single equation in my whole document? (Or use a perl
Amir script to change \[ to \begin{equation}?) I can't imagine that's
Amir the case. I know a bunch of people
ter all.
Nonetheless, there ought to be a command corresponding binding that
automatically opens an equation instead of a displaymath
(e.g., "M-m e" = "M-m d" + "M-m n"). Of course I ought to do it myself. I
guess I'm just too lazy. But if Dekel is working on
math.bind and found out I
Amir can use "M-m n" to number an equation, so it's not so painful
Amir after all. Nonetheless, there ought to be a command
Amir corresponding binding that automatically opens an equation
Amir instead of a displaymath (e.g., "M-m e" = "M-m d"
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 04:34:21PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why would you like to number every single equation when you will not
refer to them? Just for the pleasure to have an equation numbered
(4.5.103)? I even wrote a packages
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:55:13 -0500
From: Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lyx Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: displaymath vs. equation
While we're at it, Customization has a *very* short description of the bind
files. (It says to look at the bind files to see how they work
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 05:31:40PM +0100, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
While we're at it, Customization has a *very* short description of the bind
files. (It says to look at the bind files to see how they work.) For
example, how do I know what ~S means in a bind file? Or is there another doc
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> Dumb question. Do I have to type math-number in the minibuffer
Amir> for every single equation in my whole document? (Or use a perl
Amir> script to change \[ to \begin{equation}?) I can't imagine that's
Amir> the case. I know a bunch
;M-m n" to number an equation, so it's not so painful after all.
Nonetheless, there ought to be a command & corresponding binding that
automatically opens an equation instead of a displaymath
(e.g., "M-m e" = "M-m d" + "M-m n"). Of course I ought to do it myself.
:)
Amir> On the other hand, I just looked at math.bind and found out I
Amir> can use "M-m n" to number an equation, so it's not so painful
Amir> after all. Nonetheless, there ought to be a command &
Amir> corresponding binding that automatically opens an equation
Amir&g
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 04:34:21PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Why would you like to number every single equation when you will not
> refer to them? Just for the pleasure to have an equation numbered
> (4.5.103)? I even wrote a
>>Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:55:13 -0500
>>From: Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Lyx Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: displaymath vs. equation
>>
>>
>>While we're at it, Customization has a *very* short description of the b
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 05:31:40PM +0100, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
>
> >>While we're at it, Customization has a *very* short description of the bind
> >>files. (It says to look at the bind files to see how they work.) For
> >>example, how do I know what ~S means in a bind file? Or is there
77 matches
Mail list logo
