Uwe == Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uwe Sven Schreiber schrieb:
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short
while ago -- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also
append a ' as a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign
here), latex complains about
Uwe == Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uwe Sven Schreiber schrieb:
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short
while ago -- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also
append a ' as a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign
here), latex complains about
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Sven Schreiber schrieb:
>> Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short
>> while ago -- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also
>> append a "'" as a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign
>> here), latex
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
-- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a ' as
a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
about double superscript. Minimal lyx file is embedded below, but I
guess only
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
-- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a ' as
a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
about double superscript. Minimal lyx file is embedded
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
-- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a ' as
a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
about double superscript. Minimal lyx file is embedded
Daniel Watkins schrieb:
LyX is creating a correct LaTeX file. If you try the same formula in a .tex
file, LaTeX will complain. It's just not valid LaTeX, so you need to make
it $a^{*\prime)$. This is not a LyX issue.
Dan
Sorry, that sounds self-contradictory, or is it because I should
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Daniel Watkins schrieb:
LyX is creating a correct LaTeX file. If you try the same formula in a .tex
file, LaTeX will complain. It's just not valid LaTeX, so you need to make
it $a^{*\prime)$. This is not a LyX issue.
Dan
Sorry, that sounds self-contradictory, or is it
Sven Schreiber schrieb:
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
-- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a ' as
a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
about double superscript.
I know how to workaround, but I
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
-- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a ' as
a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
about double superscript. Minimal lyx file is embedded below, but I
guess only
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
-- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a ' as
a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
about double superscript. Minimal lyx file is embedded
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
-- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a ' as
a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
about double superscript. Minimal lyx file is embedded
Daniel Watkins schrieb:
LyX is creating a correct LaTeX file. If you try the same formula in a .tex
file, LaTeX will complain. It's just not valid LaTeX, so you need to make
it $a^{*\prime)$. This is not a LyX issue.
Dan
Sorry, that sounds self-contradictory, or is it because I should
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Daniel Watkins schrieb:
LyX is creating a correct LaTeX file. If you try the same formula in a .tex
file, LaTeX will complain. It's just not valid LaTeX, so you need to make
it $a^{*\prime)$. This is not a LyX issue.
Dan
Sorry, that sounds self-contradictory, or is it
Sven Schreiber schrieb:
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
-- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a ' as
a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
about double superscript.
I know how to workaround, but I
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
-- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a "'" as
a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
about double superscript. Minimal lyx file is embedded below, but I
guess only
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
-- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a "'" as
a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
about double superscript. Minimal lyx file is embedded
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
> -- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a "'" as
> a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
> about double superscript. Minimal lyx file is
Daniel Watkins schrieb:
> LyX is creating a correct LaTeX file. If you try the same formula in a .tex
> file, LaTeX will complain. It's just not valid LaTeX, so you need to make
> it $a^{*\prime)$. This is not a LyX issue.
>
> Dan
>
Sorry, that sounds self-contradictory, or is it because I
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Daniel Watkins schrieb:
LyX is creating a correct LaTeX file. If you try the same formula in a .tex
file, LaTeX will complain. It's just not valid LaTeX, so you need to make
it $a^{*\prime)$. This is not a LyX issue.
Dan
Sorry, that sounds self-contradictory, or is it
Sven Schreiber schrieb:
Hi, I just ran into the same thing reported by Bo Peng a short while ago
-- if in math you make an explicit superscript but also append a "'" as
a shortcut for prime (= matrix transpose sign here), latex complains
about double superscript.
I know how to workaround, but
21 matches
Mail list logo
