Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

I am using LyX 1.6.0 on OS X 10.5 and I can confirm the behavior of the Shift-key problem. If I use the Shift key plus the left and right arrows, no text is selected, and the arrows simply move left and right as though Shift were not being held down (same behavior for both left and right Shift

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

charles reid wrote: I am using LyX 1.6.0 on OS X 10.5 and I can confirm the behavior of the Shift-key problem. If I use the Shift key plus the left and right arrows, no text is selected, and the arrows simply move left and right as though Shift were not being held down (same behavior for

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

Brian Kidd wrote: i am a long-time LyX user and big fan of the software. i recently upgraded to 1.6 and noticed a few strange editing problems. Most likely, you have own customized bind- and/or ui-files from old versions in your user-directory, which are copied over to the new version, but

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel - fixed

thanks for the suggestions. removing the .bind file worked and i was able to create new bindings that match my previous shortcuts. thanks, -brian On Dec 3, 2008, at 4:27 AM, Konrad Hofbauer wrote: Brian Kidd wrote: i am a long-time LyX user and big fan of the software. i recently upgraded

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

It turns out the issue was, as mentioned, related to a bind file - I was able to restore functionality by going to LyX Preferences Shortcuts and changing the Bind File field from what it was to mac.bind. However, if I simply deleted or moved my old bind file, it didn't fix the problem. When

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

I am using LyX 1.6.0 on OS X 10.5 and I can confirm the behavior of the Shift-key problem. If I use the Shift key plus the left and right arrows, no text is selected, and the arrows simply move left and right as though Shift were not being held down (same behavior for both left and right Shift

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

charles reid wrote: I am using LyX 1.6.0 on OS X 10.5 and I can confirm the behavior of the Shift-key problem. If I use the Shift key plus the left and right arrows, no text is selected, and the arrows simply move left and right as though Shift were not being held down (same behavior for

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

Brian Kidd wrote: i am a long-time LyX user and big fan of the software. i recently upgraded to 1.6 and noticed a few strange editing problems. Most likely, you have own customized bind- and/or ui-files from old versions in your user-directory, which are copied over to the new version, but

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel - fixed

thanks for the suggestions. removing the .bind file worked and i was able to create new bindings that match my previous shortcuts. thanks, -brian On Dec 3, 2008, at 4:27 AM, Konrad Hofbauer wrote: Brian Kidd wrote: i am a long-time LyX user and big fan of the software. i recently upgraded

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

It turns out the issue was, as mentioned, related to a bind file - I was able to restore functionality by going to LyX Preferences Shortcuts and changing the Bind File field from what it was to mac.bind. However, if I simply deleted or moved my old bind file, it didn't fix the problem. When

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

I am using LyX 1.6.0 on OS X 10.5 and I can confirm the behavior of the Shift-key problem. If I use the Shift key plus the left and right arrows, no text is selected, and the arrows simply move left and right as though Shift were not being held down (same behavior for both left and right Shift

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

charles reid wrote: > I am using LyX 1.6.0 on OS X 10.5 and I can confirm the behavior of the > Shift-key problem. If I use the Shift key plus the left and right arrows, > no text is selected, and the arrows simply move left and right as though > Shift were not being held down (same behavior for

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

Brian Kidd wrote: i am a long-time LyX user and big fan of the software. i recently upgraded to 1.6 and noticed a few strange editing problems. Most likely, you have own customized bind- and/or ui-files from old versions in your user-directory, which are copied over to the new version, but

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel - fixed

thanks for the suggestions. removing the .bind file worked and i was able to create new bindings that match my previous shortcuts. thanks, -brian On Dec 3, 2008, at 4:27 AM, Konrad Hofbauer wrote: Brian Kidd wrote: i am a long-time LyX user and big fan of the software. i recently upgraded

Re: editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

It turns out the issue was, as mentioned, related to a bind file - I was able to restore functionality by going to LyX > Preferences > Shortcuts and changing the Bind File field from what it was to "mac.bind". However, if I simply deleted or moved my old bind file, it didn't fix the problem.

editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

hello, i am a long-time LyX user and big fan of the software. i recently upgraded to 1.6 and noticed a few strange editing problems. cmd- return does not break the paragraph (nothing happens and LyX displays unknown function in the lower left) and holding down shift to highlight

editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

hello, i am a long-time LyX user and big fan of the software. i recently upgraded to 1.6 and noticed a few strange editing problems. cmd- return does not break the paragraph (nothing happens and LyX displays unknown function in the lower left) and holding down shift to highlight

editing problems with 1.6 and mac 10.4 intel

hello, i am a long-time LyX user and big fan of the software. i recently upgraded to 1.6 and noticed a few strange editing problems. cmd- return does not break the paragraph (nothing happens and LyX displays unknown function in the lower left) and holding down shift to highlight