I use LyX to write math papers, so there are proposition, theorem, proof, etc.
environments. I would like to be able to export a tex file, let my colleague
make minor modifications on it, and then import it. Whenever I do this, even
if the tex file is unmodified, I get the \begin{prop}, etc
On 20/04/2011 12:04 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote:
I use LyX to write math papers, so there are proposition, theorem, proof, etc.
environments. I would like to be able to export a tex file, let my colleague
make minor modifications on it, and then import it. Whenever I do this, even
if the tex
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Nothing wrong on your part. The LyX-TeX-LyX cycle is not completely
up-to-par and I would personally avoid any working environment which relies
on it on a regular basis.
See [1] for a recent discussion.
Liviu
[1]
On 20/04/2011 12:28 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote:
Thanks. I see this as a important obstacle to wider acceptance of LyX. Since
it seems to be mainly these standard environments, maybe it should not be so
hard to fix. For instance could the exporter generate some comments that the
importer uses
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
complete LyX-TeX-LyX cycle is on the roadmap.
I would venture that this is a candidate for GSoC 2012.
Liviu
I use LyX to write math papers, so there are proposition, theorem, proof, etc.
environments. I would like to be able to export a tex file, let my colleague
make minor modifications on it, and then import it. Whenever I do this, even
if the tex file is unmodified, I get the \begin{prop}, etc
On 20/04/2011 12:04 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote:
I use LyX to write math papers, so there are proposition, theorem, proof, etc.
environments. I would like to be able to export a tex file, let my colleague
make minor modifications on it, and then import it. Whenever I do this, even
if the tex
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Nothing wrong on your part. The LyX-TeX-LyX cycle is not completely
up-to-par and I would personally avoid any working environment which relies
on it on a regular basis.
See [1] for a recent discussion.
Liviu
[1]
On 20/04/2011 12:28 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote:
Thanks. I see this as a important obstacle to wider acceptance of LyX. Since
it seems to be mainly these standard environments, maybe it should not be so
hard to fix. For instance could the exporter generate some comments that the
importer uses
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
complete LyX-TeX-LyX cycle is on the roadmap.
I would venture that this is a candidate for GSoC 2012.
Liviu
I use LyX to write math papers, so there are proposition, theorem, proof, etc.
environments. I would like to be able to export a tex file, let my colleague
make minor modifications on it, and then import it. Whenever I do this, even
if the tex file is unmodified, I get the \begin{prop}, etc
On 20/04/2011 12:04 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote:
I use LyX to write math papers, so there are proposition, theorem, proof, etc.
environments. I would like to be able to export a tex file, let my colleague
make minor modifications on it, and then import it. Whenever I do this, even
if the tex
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
> Nothing wrong on your part. The LyX->TeX->LyX cycle is not completely
> up-to-par and I would personally avoid any working environment which relies
> on it on a regular basis.
>
See [1] for a recent discussion.
On 20/04/2011 12:28 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote:
Thanks. I see this as a important obstacle to wider acceptance of LyX. Since
it seems to be mainly these standard environments, maybe it should not be so
hard to fix. For instance could the exporter generate some comments that the
importer uses
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
> complete LyX->TeX->LyX cycle is on the roadmap.
>
I would venture that this is a candidate for GSoC 2012.
Liviu
15 matches
Mail list logo