Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 16:47 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/14/2011 07:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case
for references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of
'sub'.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Putting the above into local layout (make sure you put Format 35 as
the first line, though) should change the default. It won't change
what's already there.
Added this, but no change.
What I recognized is that formatted references (I use refstyle) are fine within
a one file document, i.e. added 'section'. But when I have child documents
included they appear as '??'
Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 19:47 schrieb Julien Rioux:
On 14/07/2011 7:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case
for references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of
'sub'.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Sebastian
Are you by any chance also using subfloats? i.e. floats within floats?
There is a incompatibility between the package used by LyX to do this, and
the refstyle package used for formatted references.
Indeed I am using subfloats.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 16:47 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/14/2011 07:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case
for references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of
'sub'.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Putting the above into local layout (make sure you put Format 35 as
the first line, though) should change the default. It won't change
what's already there.
Added this, but no change.
What I recognized is that formatted references (I use refstyle) are fine within
a one file document, i.e. added 'section'. But when I have child documents
included they appear as '??'
Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 19:47 schrieb Julien Rioux:
On 14/07/2011 7:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case
for references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of
'sub'.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Sebastian
Are you by any chance also using subfloats? i.e. floats within floats?
There is a incompatibility between the package used by LyX to do this, and
the refstyle package used for formatted references.
Indeed I am using subfloats.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 16:47 schrieb Richard Heck:
> On 07/14/2011 07:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
>> Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
>>
>>> On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case
for references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
>>> The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix "sub" for
>>> such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
>>> defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
>>> Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
>> Thanks for the explanation.
>> IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of
>> 'sub'.
>>
>>> (i) Put a format declaration for "sub" references into your preamble.
>>> How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
>>> prettyref. (This is set under Document>Settings.) For prettyref, you can
>>> do something like:
>>> \newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
>>> For refstyle:
>>> \newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
>>> Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
>>>
>>> (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
>>> and can be done in a module, in local layout (under Document>Settings),
>>> or wherever you wish:
>>> Style Subsection
>>> RefPrefix sec
>>> End
>>> The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
>>> the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
>>> ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
>>> system one.
>> I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
>> (still '??').
>> For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
>> writing 'section'.
>>
> Putting the above into local layout (make sure you put "Format 35" as
> the first line, though) should change the default. It won't change
> what's already there.
Added this, but no change.
What I recognized is that formatted references (I use refstyle) are fine within
a one file document, i.e. added 'section'. But when I have child documents
included they appear as '??'
Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 19:47 schrieb Julien Rioux:
> On 14/07/2011 7:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
>>
>> Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
>>
>>> On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case
for references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
>>> The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix "sub" for
>>> such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
>>> defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
>>> Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
>>
>> Thanks for the explanation.
>> IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of
>> 'sub'.
>>
>>> (i) Put a format declaration for "sub" references into your preamble.
>>> How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
>>> prettyref. (This is set under Document>Settings.) For prettyref, you can
>>> do something like:
>>>\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
>>> For refstyle:
>>>\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
>>> Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
>>>
>>> (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
>>> and can be done in a module, in local layout (under Document>Settings),
>>> or wherever you wish:
>>>Style Subsection
>>>RefPrefix sec
>>>End
>>> The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
>>> the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
>>> ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
>>> system one.
>>
>> I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
>> (still '??').
>> For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
>> writing 'section'.
>>
>> Sebastian
>
> Are you by any chance also using subfloats? i.e. floats within floats?
> There is a incompatibility between the package used by LyX to do this, and
> the refstyle package used for formatted references.
Indeed I am using subfloats.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for
references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
On 07/14/2011 07:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case
for references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Putting the above into local layout (make sure you put Format 35 as
the first line, though) should change the default. It won't change
what's already there.
rh
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
On 14/07/2011 7:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear
to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for
references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Sebastian
Are you by any chance also using subfloats? i.e. floats within floats?
There is a incompatibility between the package used by LyX to do this,
and the refstyle package used for formatted references.
--
Julien
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for
references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
On 07/14/2011 07:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case
for references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Putting the above into local layout (make sure you put Format 35 as
the first line, though) should change the default. It won't change
what's already there.
rh
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
On 14/07/2011 7:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear
to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for
references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Sebastian
Are you by any chance also using subfloats? i.e. floats within floats?
There is a incompatibility between the package used by LyX to do this,
and the refstyle package used for formatted references.
--
Julien
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
> On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
>>
>> I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
>> quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
>>
>> Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
>> appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for
>> references within a 'subsection'.
>>
>> This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
>> easily.
>>
>> Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
>> Any comments?
>>
> The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix "sub" for
> such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
> defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
> Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'.
> (i) Put a format declaration for "sub" references into your preamble.
> How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
> prettyref. (This is set under Document>Settings.) For prettyref, you can
> do something like:
>\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
> For refstyle:
>\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
> Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
>
> (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
> and can be done in a module, in local layout (under Document>Settings),
> or wherever you wish:
>Style Subsection
>RefPrefix sec
>End
> The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
> the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
> ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
> system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
On 07/14/2011 07:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
> Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
>
>> On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
>>>
>>> I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
>>> quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
>>>
>>> Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references
>>> appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case
>>> for references within a 'subsection'.
>>>
>>> This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
>>> easily.
>>>
>>> Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
>>> Any comments?
>>>
>> The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix "sub" for
>> such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
>> defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
>> Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
> Thanks for the explanation.
> IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'.
>
>> (i) Put a format declaration for "sub" references into your preamble.
>> How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
>> prettyref. (This is set under Document>Settings.) For prettyref, you can
>> do something like:
>>\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
>> For refstyle:
>>\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
>> Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
>>
>> (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
>> and can be done in a module, in local layout (under Document>Settings),
>> or wherever you wish:
>>Style Subsection
>>RefPrefix sec
>>End
>> The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
>> the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
>> ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
>> system one.
> I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
> (still '??').
> For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
> writing 'section'.
>
Putting the above into local layout (make sure you put "Format 35" as
the first line, though) should change the default. It won't change
what's already there.
rh
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
On 14/07/2011 7:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear
to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for
references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix "sub" for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
Thanks for the explanation.
IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'.
(i) Put a format declaration for "sub" references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under Document>Settings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under Document>Settings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work
(still '??').
For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually
writing 'section'.
Sebastian
Are you by any chance also using subfloats? i.e. floats within floats?
There is a incompatibility between the package used by LyX to do this,
and the refstyle package used for formatted references.
--
Julien
formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear
to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for
references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
Richard
formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
Hi,
I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear
to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for
references within a 'subsection'.
This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
easily.
Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
Any comments?
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
(i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
Richard
formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8.
>
> I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is
> quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc.
>
> Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear
> to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for
> references within a 'subsection'.
>
> This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document
> easily.
>
> Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem?
> Any comments?
>
The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix "sub" for
such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle
defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not.
Anyway, you can deal with it two ways.
(i) Put a format declaration for "sub" references into your preamble.
How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or
prettyref. (This is set under Document>Settings.) For prettyref, you can
do something like:
\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}}
For refstyle:
\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}}
Of course, you can adapt these as you wish.
(ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout,
and can be done in a module, in local layout (under Document>Settings),
or wherever you wish:
Style Subsection
RefPrefix sec
End
The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy
the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux,
~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the
system one.
Richard
