Re: lyx 1.3.6 win32: perl on xp?

2005-08-26 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
Unless you want to use relyx then you don't need perl. I suggest you go and get tex2lyx (info on the wiki) and forget about perl all together Geoff On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Marcus Beyer wrote: Hello all! Congrats for successfully completing the Windows port of LyX! I just installed it.

Re: lyx 1.3.6 win32: perl on xp?

2005-08-26 Thread Marcus Beyer
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: Unless you want to use relyx then you don't need perl. I suggest you go and get tex2lyx (info on the wiki) and forget about perl all together I see. Thank you! -- Grüße, Marcus http://www.Stormlight.de Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important

Re: lyx 1.3.6 win32: perl on xp?

2005-08-26 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
Unless you want to use relyx then you don't need perl. I suggest you go and get tex2lyx (info on the wiki) and forget about perl all together Geoff On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Marcus Beyer wrote: Hello all! Congrats for successfully completing the Windows port of LyX! I just installed it.

Re: lyx 1.3.6 win32: perl on xp?

2005-08-26 Thread Marcus Beyer
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: Unless you want to use relyx then you don't need perl. I suggest you go and get tex2lyx (info on the wiki) and forget about perl all together I see. Thank you! -- Grüße, Marcus http://www.Stormlight.de Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important

Re: lyx 1.3.6 win32: perl on xp?

2005-08-26 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
Unless you want to use relyx then you don't need perl. I suggest you go and get tex2lyx (info on the wiki) and forget about perl all together Geoff On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Marcus Beyer wrote: Hello all! Congrats for successfully completing the Windows port of LyX! I just installed it.

Re: lyx 1.3.6 win32: perl on xp?

2005-08-26 Thread Marcus Beyer
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: Unless you want to use relyx then you don't need perl. I suggest you go and get tex2lyx (info on the wiki) and forget about perl all together I see. Thank you! -- Grüße, Marcus "Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very