As described behind the #
I followed JMarcs adviced:
If you still have the directory where you built LyX, then
>>gitpull >(should be git pull)
I think I forgot to merge after git pull
I guess it is the easiest to get the dev version anew
By the way, when will the 2.4 version be
Am 16.04.22 um 11:04 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
I got this message:
Am 14.04.22 um 22:24 schrieb Nathan Blodgett:
Alright then, I will post to lyx-devel and with more info.
Basically Pacstall is package manager for Debian based systems and for
more info see pacstall.dev
On Saturday, 9 April 2022 18.15.31 WEST Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users
wrote:
> > however, after it and after
>
> ./configure --with-version-suffix=lyx24n
> (I unfortunately forgot --bindir=/usr/local/bin)
> make
> make install
>
> and running a lyx file I get again:
>
> Warning:
This is a kind reminder to those, who might be able to help
Wolfgang
Am 09.04.22 um 19:15 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>>> I followed the advice of JMarc >
If you still have the directory where you built LyX, then
gitpull >(should be git pull)
make
should be enough (you can add
>>> I followed the advice of JMarc >
If you still have the directory where you built LyX, then
gitpull >(should be git pull)
make
should be enough (you can add "./autogen.sh" as a second line to play
safe). > this I omitted
But you have a newer LyX 2.4 somewhere, since you produced a
the 2.4.0 format.
JMarc
ok, I understand.
That explains the troubles I had with
lyx not a readable Lyx document
Wolfgang
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Le 08/04/2022 à 08:18, Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users a écrit :
are you saying, the lyx2lyx is changing in the 2.4.x?
The LyX format itself changes regularly during the 2.4.0dev timeline.
lyx2lyx is updated simultaneously.
When 2.4.0 is released, the format will be fixed and lyx2lyx
Yes and no,
LyX 2.4 uses a different format from 2.3 and hence the (2.3) lyx2lyx
does not know the new (2.4) format (yet).
That happens during (almost) every major upgrade and the developers
then usually "backport" that so I would think the eventual 2.3.6.3 (or
2.3.7) will be able to read the
Am 08.04.22 um 07:21 schrieb Dr Eberhard Lisse via lyx-users:
An older version of lyx2lyx can't know about newer formats?
el
On 2022-04-07 09:55 , Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users wrote:
[...]
I remember, that one does not need a lyx2lyx in the same version, here
2.4.x
Has this changed?
An older version of lyx2lyx can't know about newer formats?
el
On 2022-04-07 09:55 , Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users wrote:
[...]
I remember, that one does not need a lyx2lyx in the same version, here
2.4.x
Has this changed?
Wolfgang
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Am 06.04.22 um 18:05 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 06/04/2022 à 17:58, Wolfgang Engelmann a écrit :
Am 06.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 06/04/2022 à 17:44, Wolfgang Engelmann a écrit :
And this is the output from the terminal starting lyx there:
lyx24x
JMarc found out that the version was an older one.
Wolfgang
Am 06.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 06/04/2022 à 17:44, Wolfgang Engelmann a écrit :
And this is the output from the terminal starting lyx there:
lyx24x MEINLEBEN2020-B.lyx
Warning: 609: Format not supported.
Le 31/03/2022 à 10:48, Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users a écrit :
I posted this already under
tmp/lyx not a readable file
(01March22)
The error message:
/tmp/lyx_tmpdir.MQUsZMBvAPQl/Buffer_convertLyXFormatwrdYvM.lyx is not a
readable LyX document.
since quite a number of my older (March 22
I posted this already under
tmp/lyx not a readable file
(01March22)
The error message:
/tmp/lyx_tmpdir.MQUsZMBvAPQl/Buffer_convertLyXFormatwrdYvM.lyx is not a
readable LyX document.
since quite a number of my older (March 22) lyx files are affected and I
can't open them, I would very much
14 matches
Mail list logo
