Re: noweb should be a module not a class

2009-07-28 Thread Sam Liddicott
* Sam Liddicott wrote, On 27/07/09 11:21: I think noweb should not exist as a class, but as a module; what if I want to do a KOMA-script book with noweb fragments in? I am now absolutely certain that noweb should be a module and not a class. I see however that noweb (literate) file format is

Re: noweb should be a module not a class

2009-07-28 Thread Sam Liddicott
Wahey: maybe we can get noweb as a module very simply... I added this file noweb.module to my .lyx/layouts directory (and reconfigured Lyx). --8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8--- #\DeclareLyXModule[noweb.sty]{Noweb} #DescriptionBegin #Adds \usepackage{noweb} to your document,

Re: noweb should be a module not a class

2009-07-28 Thread Sam Liddicott
* Sam Liddicott wrote, On 27/07/09 11:21: I think noweb should not exist as a class, but as a module; what if I want to do a KOMA-script book with noweb fragments in? I am now absolutely certain that noweb should be a module and not a class. I see however that noweb (literate) file format is

Re: noweb should be a module not a class

2009-07-28 Thread Sam Liddicott
Wahey: maybe we can get noweb as a module very simply... I added this file noweb.module to my .lyx/layouts directory (and reconfigured Lyx). --8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8--- #\DeclareLyXModule[noweb.sty]{Noweb} #DescriptionBegin #Adds \usepackage{noweb} to your document,

Re: noweb should be a module not a class

2009-07-28 Thread Sam Liddicott
* Sam Liddicott wrote, On 27/07/09 11:21: > I think noweb should not exist as a class, but as a module; what if I > want to do a KOMA-script book with noweb fragments in? I am now absolutely certain that noweb should be a module and not a class. I see however that noweb (literate) file format is

Re: noweb should be a module not a class

2009-07-28 Thread Sam Liddicott
Wahey: maybe we can get noweb as a module very simply... I added this file noweb.module to my .lyx/layouts directory (and reconfigured Lyx). --8<-8<-8<-8<-8<-8<-8<-8<-8<--- #\DeclareLyXModule[noweb.sty]{Noweb} #DescriptionBegin #Adds \usepackage{noweb} to your

noweb should be a module not a class

2009-07-27 Thread Sam Liddicott
I think noweb should not exist as a class, but as a module; what if I want to do a KOMA-script book with noweb fragments in? noweb is really used with \usepackage{noweb} showing that it is not actually a document class at all. Perhaps it would be better as a module? Also; if \newenvironment is

noweb should be a module not a class

2009-07-27 Thread Sam Liddicott
I think noweb should not exist as a class, but as a module; what if I want to do a KOMA-script book with noweb fragments in? noweb is really used with \usepackage{noweb} showing that it is not actually a document class at all. Perhaps it would be better as a module? Also; if \newenvironment is

noweb should be a module not a class

2009-07-27 Thread Sam Liddicott
I think noweb should not exist as a class, but as a module; what if I want to do a KOMA-script book with noweb fragments in? noweb is really used with \usepackage{noweb} showing that it is not actually a document class at all. Perhaps it would be better as a module? Also; if \newenvironment is