Hello,
I've just been trying use the command \xrightarrow with it optional
argument, e.g.
\[ leftside \xright[down]{up} rightside \]
Is it possible to do this (and in general use optional arguments in
math/display mode)? I've tried writing it as regular text (without the
\[ and \]) and
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:10:17PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
Hello,
I've just been trying use the command \xrightarrow with it optional
argument, e.g.
\[ leftside \xright[down]{up} rightside \]
\xrightarrow is supported 'natively'.
Just make sure to enable AMS.
Is it possible to do
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:10:17PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
Hello,
I've just been trying use the command \xrightarrow with it optional
argument, e.g.
\[ leftside \xright[down]{up} rightside \]
Is it possible to do this (and in general use optional arguments in
math/display mode)?
Thanks for the quick answer
\xrightarrow is supported 'natively'.
Just make sure to enable AMS.
The problem is the optional argument, not just using \xrightarrow
If it is indeed imposible, might it be better if there was an option
within math mode to enter pure latex, without Lyx helping
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:37:21PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
Thanks for the quick answer
\xrightarrow is supported 'natively'.
Just make sure to enable AMS.
The problem is the optional argument, not just using \xrightarrow
What happens if you simply write a '[' there? What does the
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:57:39PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but see attached files.
So this is bug in 1.2.x
Best I can offer is attached.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:57:39PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
What happens if you simply write a '[' there? What does the exported
.tex look like? What the is the problem?
I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but see attached files.
Its not very important, so if there is no simple
Hello,
I've just been trying use the command \xrightarrow with it optional
argument, e.g.
\[ leftside \xright[down]{up} rightside \]
Is it possible to do this (and in general use optional arguments in
math/display mode)? I've tried writing it as regular text (without the
\[ and \]) and
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:10:17PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
Hello,
I've just been trying use the command \xrightarrow with it optional
argument, e.g.
\[ leftside \xright[down]{up} rightside \]
\xrightarrow is supported 'natively'.
Just make sure to enable AMS.
Is it possible to do
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:10:17PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
Hello,
I've just been trying use the command \xrightarrow with it optional
argument, e.g.
\[ leftside \xright[down]{up} rightside \]
Is it possible to do this (and in general use optional arguments in
math/display mode)?
Thanks for the quick answer
\xrightarrow is supported 'natively'.
Just make sure to enable AMS.
The problem is the optional argument, not just using \xrightarrow
If it is indeed imposible, might it be better if there was an option
within math mode to enter pure latex, without Lyx helping
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:37:21PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
Thanks for the quick answer
\xrightarrow is supported 'natively'.
Just make sure to enable AMS.
The problem is the optional argument, not just using \xrightarrow
What happens if you simply write a '[' there? What does the
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:57:39PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but see attached files.
So this is bug in 1.2.x
Best I can offer is attached.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:57:39PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
What happens if you simply write a '[' there? What does the exported
.tex look like? What the is the problem?
I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but see attached files.
Its not very important, so if there is no simple
Hello,
I've just been trying use the command \xrightarrow with it optional
argument, e.g.
\[ leftside \xright[down]{up} rightside \]
Is it possible to do this (and in general use optional arguments in
math/display mode)? I've tried writing it as regular text (without the
\[ and \]) and
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:10:17PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just been trying use the command \xrightarrow with it optional
> argument, e.g.
>
> \[ leftside \xright[down]{up} rightside \]
\xrightarrow is supported 'natively'.
Just make sure to enable AMS.
> Is it possible
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:10:17PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just been trying use the command \xrightarrow with it optional
> argument, e.g.
>
> \[ leftside \xright[down]{up} rightside \]
>
> Is it possible to do this (and in general use optional arguments in
> math/display
Thanks for the quick answer
\xrightarrow is supported 'natively'.
Just make sure to enable AMS.
The problem is the optional argument, not just using \xrightarrow
If it is indeed imposible, might it be better if there was an option
within math mode to enter pure latex, without Lyx "helping"
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:37:21PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
> Thanks for the quick answer
>
>
> >\xrightarrow is supported 'natively'.
> >
> >Just make sure to enable AMS.
>
> The problem is the optional argument, not just using \xrightarrow
What happens if you simply write a '[' there? What
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:57:39PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
> I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but see attached files.
So this is bug in 1.2.x
Best I can offer is attached.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:57:39PM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
> > What happens if you simply write a '[' there? What does the exported
> > .tex look like? What the is the "problem"?
>
> I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but see attached files.
>
> Its not very important, so if there is no
21 matches
Mail list logo
