Graphviz in Lyx and relative paths

Hi, Can I use custom shapes in graphviz with Lyx and have relative paths somehow? Working graphviz file: digraph { testare[image=/my/dir/UMLActor.png] } I'd like to use this file instead, so I can relocate the Lyx document directory. digraph { testare[image=UMLActor.png

Graphviz in Lyx and relative paths

Hi, Can I use custom shapes in graphviz with Lyx and have relative paths somehow? Working graphviz file: digraph { testare[image=/my/dir/UMLActor.png] } I'd like to use this file instead, so I can relocate the Lyx document directory. digraph { testare[image=UMLActor.png

Graphviz in Lyx and relative paths

Hi, Can I use custom shapes in graphviz with Lyx and have relative paths somehow? Working graphviz file: digraph { testare[image=] } I'd like to use this file instead, so I can relocate the Lyx document directory. digraph { testare[image=] } -- robin

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

that using relative paths to tex files at the lyx preamble does not work anymore. I have directory structures where lyx files are at some directories, bib files at other, latex preamble commands at othes, and so on ... The lyx preamble contains some input commands to take the corresponding latex

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

2011 05:25:57 PM EEST, Oscar Lopez wrote: Dear LyXers I have recenty updated my lyx version to lyx 2.0.1 and I have found that using relative paths to tex files at the lyx preamble does not work anymore. I have directory structures where lyx files are at some directories, bib files at other

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

) but I could not find any reasonable solution beyond providing the full path. I do not know! As far as I know before lyx 2.0.1 using relative paths was the way to ensure to share projects that use many directories to organize the information. I have been using lyx since 1997 and never have

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

) Thank you very much for your comment Curtis Best regards Oscar On Thu 20 Oct 2011 05:25:57 PM EEST, Oscar Lopez wrote: Dear LyXers I have recenty updated my lyx version to lyx 2.0.1 and I have found that using relative paths to tex files at the lyx preamble does

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

relative paths was the way to ensure to share projects that use many directories to organize the information. I have been using lyx since 1997 and never have a problem with this. In fact, I have been used to work in this way and it even worst I teach many people to do so. It would be nice

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

in a different case) but I could not find any reasonable solution beyond providing the full path. I do not know! As far as I know before lyx 2.0.1 using relative paths was the way to ensure to share projects that use many directories to organize the information. I have been using lyx since 1997

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

I have found command line and shell scripts to be the best, though admittedly imperfect, options: $ cp filename.lyx filename-mytemp.lyx $ lyx -e latex filename-mytemp.lyx $ pdflatex filename-mytemp.tex $ cp filename-mytemp.pdf filename.pdf $ rm filename-mytemp* I wish i knew of a way to put a

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

that using relative paths to tex files at the lyx preamble does not work anymore. I have directory structures where lyx files are at some directories, bib files at other, latex preamble commands at othes, and so on ... The lyx preamble contains some input commands to take the corresponding latex

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

2011 05:25:57 PM EEST, Oscar Lopez wrote: Dear LyXers I have recenty updated my lyx version to lyx 2.0.1 and I have found that using relative paths to tex files at the lyx preamble does not work anymore. I have directory structures where lyx files are at some directories, bib files at other

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

) but I could not find any reasonable solution beyond providing the full path. I do not know! As far as I know before lyx 2.0.1 using relative paths was the way to ensure to share projects that use many directories to organize the information. I have been using lyx since 1997 and never have

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

) Thank you very much for your comment Curtis Best regards Oscar On Thu 20 Oct 2011 05:25:57 PM EEST, Oscar Lopez wrote: Dear LyXers I have recenty updated my lyx version to lyx 2.0.1 and I have found that using relative paths to tex files at the lyx preamble does

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

relative paths was the way to ensure to share projects that use many directories to organize the information. I have been using lyx since 1997 and never have a problem with this. In fact, I have been used to work in this way and it even worst I teach many people to do so. It would be nice

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

in a different case) but I could not find any reasonable solution beyond providing the full path. I do not know! As far as I know before lyx 2.0.1 using relative paths was the way to ensure to share projects that use many directories to organize the information. I have been using lyx since 1997

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

I have found command line and shell scripts to be the best, though admittedly imperfect, options: $ cp filename.lyx filename-mytemp.lyx $ lyx -e latex filename-mytemp.lyx $ pdflatex filename-mytemp.tex $ cp filename-mytemp.pdf filename.pdf $ rm filename-mytemp* I wish i knew of a way to put a

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

.1 and I have found that > using relative paths to tex files at the lyx preamble does not work anymore. > > I have directory structures where lyx files are at some directories, bib > files at other, latex preamble commands at othes, and so on ... The lyx > preamble co

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

2011 05:25:57 PM EEST, Oscar Lopez wrote: >> Dear LyXers >> >> I have recenty updated my lyx version to lyx 2.0.1 and I have found that >> using relative paths to tex files at the lyx preamble does not work anymore. >> >> I have directory structures where ly

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

rent case) but I could not find any reasonable solution beyond providing the full path. I do not know! As far as I know before lyx 2.0.1 using relative paths was the way to ensure to share projects that use many directories to organize the information. I have been using lyx since 1997 and n

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

) Thank you very much for your comment Curtis Best regards Oscar On Thu 20 Oct 2011 05:25:57 PM EEST, Oscar Lopez wrote: > Dear LyXers > > I have recenty updated my lyx version to lyx 2.0.1 and I have found that > using relative paths to tex files at the lyx p

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

he full path. > > I do not know! As far as I know before lyx 2.0.1 using relative paths was the > way to ensure to share projects that use many directories to organize the > information. I have been using lyx since 1997 and never have a problem with > this. In fact, I have been used to w

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

gt; /tmp/lyx_tmpdir./lyx_tmpbufX/ by default). I have encountered this kind >>> of behavior before (albeit in a different case) but I could not find any >>> reasonable solution beyond providing the full path. >> >> I do not know! As far as I know before lyx 2.0.1 using relat

Re: lyx 2.0.1 and relative paths to tex files

I have found command line and shell scripts to be the best, though admittedly imperfect, options: $ cp filename.lyx filename-mytemp.lyx $ lyx -e latex filename-mytemp.lyx $ pdflatex filename-mytemp.tex $ cp filename-mytemp.pdf filename.pdf $ rm filename-mytemp* I wish i knew of a way to put a

Error using -pdfpages- package with ERT and relative paths

) For collaboration and for cross-project re-use, it would be very useful if it were not necessary to specify the absolute path, but use relative paths instead. For example, if the LyX document were in the c:/research/ folder, it would be preferable to use just \includepdf{dummy} However, this does not seem

Re: Error using pdfpages package with ERT and relative paths

Venable venabl...@... writes: Apologies for the near-repeat of the previous post. I googled the heck of this problem and it seems yesterday's posts had not been captured yet.

Error using -pdfpages- package with ERT and relative paths

) For collaboration and for cross-project re-use, it would be very useful if it were not necessary to specify the absolute path, but use relative paths instead. For example, if the LyX document were in the c:/research/ folder, it would be preferable to use just \includepdf{dummy} However, this does not seem

Re: Error using pdfpages package with ERT and relative paths

Venable venabl...@... writes: Apologies for the near-repeat of the previous post. I googled the heck of this problem and it seems yesterday's posts had not been captured yet.

Error using -pdfpages- package with ERT and relative paths

) For collaboration and for cross-project re-use, it would be very useful if it were not necessary to specify the absolute path, but use relative paths instead. For example, if the LyX document were in the c:/research/ folder, it would be preferable to use just \includepdf{dummy} However, this does not seem

Re: Error using pdfpages package with ERT and relative paths

Venable writes: > Apologies for the near-repeat of the previous post. I googled the heck of this problem and it seems yesterday's posts had not been captured yet.

copying figures - absolute vs. relative paths

to relative paths, but it is somewhat inconvenient otherwise. The biggest problem is that if I move the document to another directory then everything can break. Is there a way to force LyX to keep relative paths when copying figures? James

Re: copying figures - absolute vs. relative paths

that the figure doesn't get lost due to relative paths, but it is somewhat inconvenient otherwise. The biggest problem is that if I move the document to another directory then everything can break. Is there a way to force LyX to keep relative paths when copying figures? It is a bug.. you are probably

copying figures - absolute vs. relative paths

to relative paths, but it is somewhat inconvenient otherwise. The biggest problem is that if I move the document to another directory then everything can break. Is there a way to force LyX to keep relative paths when copying figures? James

Re: copying figures - absolute vs. relative paths

that the figure doesn't get lost due to relative paths, but it is somewhat inconvenient otherwise. The biggest problem is that if I move the document to another directory then everything can break. Is there a way to force LyX to keep relative paths when copying figures? It is a bug.. you are probably

copying figures - absolute vs. relative paths

;lost" due to relative paths, but it is somewhat inconvenient otherwise. The biggest problem is that if I move the document to another directory then everything can break. Is there a way to force LyX to keep relative paths when copying figures? James

Re: copying figures - absolute vs. relative paths

that the figure doesn't get "lost" due to relative paths, but it is somewhat inconvenient otherwise. The biggest problem is that if I move the document to another directory then everything can break. Is there a way to force LyX to keep relative paths when copying figures? It is a bug.. you ar

relative paths

Hello, I use LyX on a Linux machine in my office and on a Windows machine at home. Sometimes I need to work on the same document on both machines. The problem is, that the path for the figures to be included is always a global one (/home/... or C:/). It would be great if I just could use

Re: relative paths

Helmut, In fact relative paths work very well - only the file selection dialog does not return them. Just enter the relative path to the figure by hand or change it after using the file selection dialog. Daniel Hauser Helmut schrieb: Hello, I use LyX on a Linux machine in my office

Re: relative paths

On 9/3/07, Daniel Lohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Helmut, In fact relative paths work very well - only the file selection dialog does not return them. Just enter the relative path to the figure by hand or change it after using the file selection dialog. Daniel Hauser Helmut schrieb

relative paths

Hello, I use LyX on a Linux machine in my office and on a Windows machine at home. Sometimes I need to work on the same document on both machines. The problem is, that the path for the figures to be included is always a global one (/home/... or C:/). It would be great if I just could use

Re: relative paths

Helmut, In fact relative paths work very well - only the file selection dialog does not return them. Just enter the relative path to the figure by hand or change it after using the file selection dialog. Daniel Hauser Helmut schrieb: Hello, I use LyX on a Linux machine in my office

Re: relative paths

On 9/3/07, Daniel Lohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Helmut, In fact relative paths work very well - only the file selection dialog does not return them. Just enter the relative path to the figure by hand or change it after using the file selection dialog. Daniel Hauser Helmut schrieb

relative paths

Hello, I use LyX on a Linux machine in my office and on a Windows machine at home. Sometimes I need to work on the same document on both machines. The problem is, that the path for the figures to be included is always a global one (/home/... or C:/). It would be great if I just could use

Re: relative paths

Helmut, In fact relative paths work very well - only the file selection dialog does not return them. Just enter the relative path to the figure by hand or change it after using the file selection dialog. Daniel Hauser Helmut schrieb: Hello, I use LyX on a Linux machine in my office

Re: relative paths

On 9/3/07, Daniel Lohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Helmut, > > In fact relative paths work very well - only the file selection dialog does > not return them. Just enter the relative path to the figure by hand or > change it after using the file selection dialog. > &g

Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Sven Schreiber wrote: So I replaced these two ERT lines: \pgfdeclareimage[width=1.4cm]{goethe}{grafiken/goethe} \logo{\pgfuseimage{goethe}} with the following ERT one-liner: \logo{\includegraphics[width=1.4cm]{grafiken/goethe}} ...and that works for me. Fine. Then there is no LyX

Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:15:43 +0200 From: Sven Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible? X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Georg Baum wrote: But I still have no clue

Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Sven == Sven Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sven Well I discovered a todo file in the official pgf-distribution Sven on ctan which says: 9) Honor \graphicspath command. Sven Is that the same thing? Yes. Jmarc

Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Sven Schreiber wrote: So I replaced these two ERT lines: \pgfdeclareimage[width=1.4cm]{goethe}{grafiken/goethe} \logo{\pgfuseimage{goethe}} with the following ERT one-liner: \logo{\includegraphics[width=1.4cm]{grafiken/goethe}} ...and that works for me. Fine. Then there is no LyX

Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:15:43 +0200 From: Sven Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible? X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Georg Baum wrote: But I still have no clue

Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Sven == Sven Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sven Well I discovered a todo file in the official pgf-distribution Sven on ctan which says: 9) Honor \graphicspath command. Sven Is that the same thing? Yes. Jmarc

Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths & beamer & temp directory: possible?

Sven Schreiber wrote: > So I replaced these two ERT lines: > > \pgfdeclareimage[width=1.4cm]{goethe}{grafiken/goethe} > \logo{\pgfuseimage{goethe}} > > with the following ERT one-liner: > > \logo{\includegraphics[width=1.4cm]{grafiken/goethe}} > > ...and that works for me. Fine. Then there

Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths & beamer & temp directory: possible?

>>Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:15:43 +0200 >>From: Sven Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>CC: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org >>Subject: Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths & beamer & temp directory: >>possible?

Re: [workaround] Re: relative paths & beamer & temp directory: possible?

> "Sven" == Sven Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sven> Well I discovered a "todo" file in the official pgf-distribution Sven> on ctan which says: "9) Honor \graphicspath command." Sven> Is that the same thing? Yes. Jmarc

Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Sven Schreiber wrote: And I have a goethe.pdf file in the grafiken directory below the location of the lyx-file. This works only if I *don't* activate the temporary directory thing. (And the relative path thing works outside ERT; this success is new on windows, right? Great stuff, this

Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Georg Baum wrote: You are doing nothing wrong. This is probably bug 1751 http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1751 Does the .tex file in the temporary directory contain something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, the first lines are: \batchmode \makeatletter [EMAIL

Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Sven Schreiber wrote: Yes, the first lines are: \batchmode \makeatletter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/Svens/testlyxtemp//}} \makeatother (Are the double slashes at the end ok?) I don't know. Does it work when you remove one slash by hand and run latex by hand? No, as you can see above. But

Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Sven Schreiber wrote: And I have a goethe.pdf file in the grafiken directory below the location of the lyx-file. This works only if I *don't* activate the temporary directory thing. (And the relative path thing works outside ERT; this success is new on windows, right? Great stuff, this

Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Georg Baum wrote: You are doing nothing wrong. This is probably bug 1751 http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1751 Does the .tex file in the temporary directory contain something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, the first lines are: \batchmode \makeatletter [EMAIL

Re: relative paths beamer temp directory: possible?

Sven Schreiber wrote: Yes, the first lines are: \batchmode \makeatletter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/Svens/testlyxtemp//}} \makeatother (Are the double slashes at the end ok?) I don't know. Does it work when you remove one slash by hand and run latex by hand? No, as you can see above. But

Re: relative paths & beamer & temp directory: possible?

Sven Schreiber wrote: > And I have a "goethe.pdf" file in the "grafiken" directory below the > location of the lyx-file. This works only if I *don't* activate the > "temporary directory" thing. (And the relative path thing works outside > ERT; this success is new on windows, right? Great stuff,

Re: relative paths & beamer & temp directory: possible?

Georg Baum wrote: > > You are doing nothing wrong. This is probably bug 1751 > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1751 > > Does the .tex file in the temporary directory contain something like > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, the first lines are: \batchmode \makeatletter [EMAIL

Re: relative paths & beamer & temp directory: possible?

Sven Schreiber wrote: > Yes, the first lines are: > > \batchmode > \makeatletter > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/Svens/testlyxtemp//}} > \makeatother > > (Are the double slashes at the end ok?) I don't know. Does it work when you remove one slash by hand and run latex by hand? > No, as you can see