More RTF import errors

here? From the terminal, /Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx Thank you Kevin! (Thank you Richard also, I really appreciate you taking the time to respond.) My terminal error for the failed rtf import says sh: rtf2latex2e: command not found. Which sounds like either a path error

Re: More RTF import errors

On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: ... and asking which latex2rtf as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you BH! now gets me /usr/local/bin/latex2rtf That is good. It will allow you to export to RTF, but not to import. But when I run Lyx and ask it to import an rtf file I still

Re: More RTF import errors

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: ... and asking which latex2rtf  as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you BH! now gets me /usr/local/bin/latex2rtf That is good. It will allow you to export to RTF, but not

Re: More RTF import errors

On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Richard Heck wrote: On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: ... and asking which latex2rtf as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you BH! now gets me /usr/local/bin/latex2rtf That is good. It will allow you to export to RTF, but not to import. So it

Re: More RTF import errors

On 02/02/2011 11:31 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Richard Heck wrote: Now what? Do I need to hunt down a different package...? Looks like it. Apparently: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg62704.html it is on MacPorts, or at least was. In

More RTF import errors

here? From the terminal, /Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx Thank you Kevin! (Thank you Richard also, I really appreciate you taking the time to respond.) My terminal error for the failed rtf import says sh: rtf2latex2e: command not found. Which sounds like either a path error

Re: More RTF import errors

On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: ... and asking which latex2rtf as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you BH! now gets me /usr/local/bin/latex2rtf That is good. It will allow you to export to RTF, but not to import. But when I run Lyx and ask it to import an rtf file I still

Re: More RTF import errors

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: ... and asking which latex2rtf  as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you BH! now gets me /usr/local/bin/latex2rtf That is good. It will allow you to export to RTF, but not

Re: More RTF import errors

On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Richard Heck wrote: On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: ... and asking which latex2rtf as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you BH! now gets me /usr/local/bin/latex2rtf That is good. It will allow you to export to RTF, but not to import. So it

Re: More RTF import errors

On 02/02/2011 11:31 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Richard Heck wrote: Now what? Do I need to hunt down a different package...? Looks like it. Apparently: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg62704.html it is on MacPorts, or at least was. In

More RTF import errors

om the terminal >>> >> Can someone on Mac help Michelle here? > > From the terminal, > > /Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx Thank you Kevin! (Thank you Richard also, I really appreciate you taking the time to respond.) My terminal error for the failed rtf i

Re: More RTF import errors

On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: ... and asking " which latex2rtf" as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you BH! now gets me "/usr/local/bin/latex2rtf" That is good. It will allow you to export to RTF, but not to import. But when I run Lyx and ask it to import an rtf file I

Re: More RTF import errors

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: >> >> ... and asking " which latex2rtf"  as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you >> BH! >> now gets me "/usr/local/bin/latex2rtf" >> > That is good. It will allow you to

Re: More RTF import errors

On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: >> >> ... and asking " which latex2rtf" as BH advised Mathias to do --Thank you >> BH! >> now gets me "/usr/local/bin/latex2rtf" >> > That is good. It will allow you to export to RTF, but not

Re: More RTF import errors

On 02/02/2011 11:31 AM, Michelle Bottorff wrote: On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Richard Heck wrote: Now what? Do I need to hunt down a different package...? Looks like it. Apparently: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg62704.html it is on MacPorts, or at least was. In

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

On 26.02.08, rgheck wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) So it works similar to * the [default] option in the line-spacing drop down

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

On 26.02.08, rgheck wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) So it works similar to * the [default] option in the line-spacing drop down

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

On 26.02.08, rgheck wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this > option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) So it works similar to * the [default] option in the

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says [justified] But this indeed fixes the formatting of the

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says [justified] But this

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says [justified] But this indeed fixes the formatting of the

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

My take is that if justified wasn't there I probably would have tried it. But if it actually removes paragraph formatting (even if it resorts to the default for the context) wouldn't it be clearer to say Remove Paragraph Formatting? I'm surmising it's doing both. So I understand the

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur to me that justified would apply to that. But maybe it does. (paragraph formatting is otherwise defined in the class?) I

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur to me that justified would apply to that. But maybe it does. (paragraph formatting is otherwise

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur to me that justified would apply to that. But maybe it

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says [justified] But this indeed fixes the formatting of the

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says [justified] But this

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says [justified] But this indeed fixes the formatting of the

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

My take is that if justified wasn't there I probably would have tried it. But if it actually removes paragraph formatting (even if it resorts to the default for the context) wouldn't it be clearer to say Remove Paragraph Formatting? I'm surmising it's doing both. So I understand the

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur to me that justified would apply to that. But maybe it does. (paragraph formatting is otherwise defined in the class?) I

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur to me that justified would apply to that. But maybe it does. (paragraph formatting is otherwise

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur to me that justified would apply to that. But maybe it

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says "[justified]" But this indeed fixes the formatting of

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says "[justified]" But

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says "[justified]" But this indeed fixes the formatting of

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

My take is that if "justified" wasn't there I probably would have tried it. But if it actually removes paragraph formatting (even if it resorts to the default for the context) wouldn't it be clearer to say "Remove Paragraph Formatting"? I'm surmising it's doing both. So I understand

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur to me that "justified" would apply to that. But maybe it does. (paragraph formatting is otherwise defined in the

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur to me that "justified" would apply to that. But maybe it does. (paragraph formatting is

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: From my view I was trying to format a footnote and get rid of an extra blank line in the footnote footer region. So it didn't occur to me that "justified" would apply to that. But maybe it

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

On Feb 25, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Richard Heck wrote: 3) Getting view source to view the paragraph in which the cursor resides as the User Guide says it will. It seems like this problem arises when the Automatic update option is unchecked; this indeed seems to be a bug. The workaround is to

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here: Main one is: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description of

rtf import

Dear LyX users, I'm not sure if I'm asking the same question as in the other thread that mentions rtf import problems, but I've been having an issue as well. Details: Mac OS 10.5.1, Intel LyX 1.5.3 and 1.5.4 FileImport Rich Text Format produces the following error message: An error occurred

Re: rtf import

On 2/25/08, Maria Gouskova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LyX 1.5.3 and 1.5.4 FileImport Rich Text Format produces the following error message: I have no such menu item. I am curious: what package is responsible for this conversion? Thanks, Liviu

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description of this problem. Is the problem that when you copy and paste, LyX is copying the paragraph formatting? -- If so, you can edit the formatting by

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says [justified] But this indeed fixes the formatting of the pasted footnote content. Thanks! Hmm. We had a really, really

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says [justified] But this indeed fixes the formatting of the pasted footnote content.

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

On Feb 25, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Richard Heck wrote: 3) Getting view source to view the paragraph in which the cursor resides as the User Guide says it will. It seems like this problem arises when the Automatic update option is unchecked; this indeed seems to be a bug. The workaround is to

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here: Main one is: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description of

rtf import

Dear LyX users, I'm not sure if I'm asking the same question as in the other thread that mentions rtf import problems, but I've been having an issue as well. Details: Mac OS 10.5.1, Intel LyX 1.5.3 and 1.5.4 FileImport Rich Text Format produces the following error message: An error occurred

Re: rtf import

On 2/25/08, Maria Gouskova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LyX 1.5.3 and 1.5.4 FileImport Rich Text Format produces the following error message: I have no such menu item. I am curious: what package is responsible for this conversion? Thanks, Liviu

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description of this problem. Is the problem that when you copy and paste, LyX is copying the paragraph formatting? -- If so, you can edit the formatting by

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says [justified] But this indeed fixes the formatting of the pasted footnote content. Thanks! Hmm. We had a really, really

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You don't have Use Paragraph's Default Alignment? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says [justified] But this indeed fixes the formatting of the pasted footnote content.

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

On Feb 25, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Richard Heck wrote: 3) Getting view source to view the paragraph in which the cursor resides as the User Guide says it will. It seems like this problem arises when the "Automatic update" option is unchecked; this indeed seems to be a bug. The workaround is

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here: Main one is: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description

rtf import

Dear LyX users, I'm not sure if I'm asking the same question as in the other thread that mentions rtf import problems, but I've been having an issue as well. Details: Mac OS 10.5.1, Intel LyX 1.5.3 and 1.5.4 File>Import Rich Text Format produces the following error message: An error occur

Re: rtf import

On 2/25/08, Maria Gouskova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LyX 1.5.3 and 1.5.4 > > File>Import Rich Text Format produces the following error message: I have no such menu item. I am curious: what package is responsible for this conversion? Thanks, Liviu

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description of this problem. Is the problem that when you copy and paste, LyX is copying the paragraph formatting? -- If so, you can edit the formatting by

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says "[justified]" But this indeed fixes the formatting of the pasted footnote content. Thanks! Hmm. We had a really,

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: You don't have "Use Paragraph's Default Alignment"? The point of this option is to undo customization. That's why I added it. ;-) Ah! I didn't try it before because it says "[justified]" But this indeed fixes the formatting of the pasted footnote

footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Hi, I'm converting some documents into LyX. As a side-note, I can't get .rtf import to work but can seem to import latex files. It would be easier if I could import .rtf files. Anyway, the problem is that once imported, I need to re-configure the footnotes. When I create a footnote

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here: Main one is: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description of this problem. Is the problem that when you copy and paste,

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here: Main one is: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description of this problem. Is the

footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Hi, I'm converting some documents into LyX. As a side-note, I can't get .rtf import to work but can seem to import latex files. It would be easier if I could import .rtf files. Anyway, the problem is that once imported, I need to re-configure the footnotes. When I create a footnote

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here: Main one is: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description of this problem. Is the problem that when you copy and paste,

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here: Main one is: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description of this problem. Is the

footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Hi, I'm converting some documents into LyX. As a side-note, I can't get .rtf import to work but can seem to import latex files. It would be easier if I could import .rtf files. Anyway, the problem is that once imported, I need to re-configure the footnotes. When I create a footnote

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here: Main one is: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description of this problem. Is the problem that when you copy and paste,

Re: footnotes problem, .rtf import, view source on 1.5.3

Quoting Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... In summary, I'm mentioning a few problems here: Main one is: 1) creating a footnote from existing text causing unusable formatting. I'm not following your description of this problem. Is

Re: RTF import

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried. It sort of worked for me. I imported a rtf file. A table in the file became a longtable and was unviewable in lyx. It showed as a lot of latex code. It printed almost ok though, except for some

Re: RTF import

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried. It sort of worked for me. I imported a rtf file. A table in the file became a longtable and was unviewable in lyx. It showed as a lot of latex code. It printed almost ok though, except for some

Re: RTF import

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried. It sort of worked for me. I imported a rtf file. A table in the file became a longtable and was unviewable in lyx. It showed as a lot of latex code. It printed almost ok though, except for some

RTF import

Hello, Some days ago, an ad has been posted on freshmeat.net about a software to import a rtf file. rtf2latex2e: http://members-http-4.rcw1.sfba.home.net/setlur/rtf2latex2e This tool seems to be able to import math equation, table and figures (jpeg, gif and wmf). I have tried the examples in

RTF import

Hello, the URL is in fact the following : http://members.home.net/setlur/rtf2latex2e/ --Nabil Yann Collete writes: Hello, Some days ago, an ad has been posted on freshmeat.net about a software to import a rtf file. rtf2latex2e:

Re: RTF import

ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried.

Re: RTF import

Worked fine for me with two simple text files produced by MS-word. All the included examples also worked. On 2 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried. -- Mark Hansel PO Box 41 Minnesota State University Moorhead Moorhead, MN

Re: RTF import

-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 07:36:27 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Hansel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RTF import MIME-Version: 1.0 Worked fine for me with two simple text

Re: RTF import

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Yann Collete [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RTF import ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried.

RTF import

Hello, Some days ago, an ad has been posted on freshmeat.net about a software to import a rtf file. rtf2latex2e: http://members-http-4.rcw1.sfba.home.net/setlur/rtf2latex2e This tool seems to be able to import math equation, table and figures (jpeg, gif and wmf). I have tried the examples in

RTF import

Hello, the URL is in fact the following : http://members.home.net/setlur/rtf2latex2e/ --Nabil Yann Collete writes: Hello, Some days ago, an ad has been posted on freshmeat.net about a software to import a rtf file. rtf2latex2e:

Re: RTF import

ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried.

Re: RTF import

Worked fine for me with two simple text files produced by MS-word. All the included examples also worked. On 2 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried. -- Mark Hansel PO Box 41 Minnesota State University Moorhead Moorhead, MN

Re: RTF import

-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 07:36:27 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Hansel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RTF import MIME-Version: 1.0 Worked fine for me with two simple text

Re: RTF import

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Yann Collete [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RTF import ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried.

RTF import

Hello, Some days ago, an ad has been posted on freshmeat.net about a software to import a rtf file. rtf2latex2e: http://members-http-4.rcw1.sfba.home.net/setlur/rtf2latex2e This tool seems to be able to import math equation, table and figures (jpeg, gif and wmf). I have tried the examples in

RTF import

Hello, the URL is in fact the following : http://members.home.net/setlur/rtf2latex2e/ --Nabil Yann Collete writes: > Hello, > > Some days ago, an ad has been posted on freshmeat.net about a > software to import a rtf file. > > rtf2latex2e: > >

Re: RTF import

ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried.

Re: RTF import

Worked fine for me with two simple text files produced by MS-word. All the included examples also worked. On 2 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried. > -- Mark Hansel PO Box 41 Minnesota State University Moorhead Moorhead, MN

Re: RTF import

ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 07:36:27 -0500 (CDT) > From: Mark Hansel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: R

Re: RTF import

; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Yann Collete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RTF import > > ANyone try it? It failed to process either of the two RTFs I tried. >