Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

. This makes no sense to me. Last March the fresh installation of TeXLive2023 worked flawlessly. This is way deeper in the TeX weeds than I've ever burrowed. Maybe someone familiar with the intersection of LaTeX and Japanese can help. Or just LaTeX and TeXLive. That's my plan. Many thanks, Rich

Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

No pages of output. Transcript written on ptex.log. fmtutil [INFO]: log file copied to: /usr/local/texlive/2024/texmf-var/web2c/euptex/ptex.log fmtutil [INFO]: /usr/local/texlive/2024/texmf-var/web2c/euptex/ptex.fmt installed. fmtutil [ERROR]: running `tex -ini   -jobname=lollipop -prognam

Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

Thank you so much for telling me what it SHOULD do. It didn't in the Mac case (two different laptops). el On 2024-03-16 20:40, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sat, 16 Mar 2024, Eberhard W Lisse wrote: [...] > A fresh installation of TeXLive2024 yesterday should have installed all > necessary files. >

Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

On Sat, 16 Mar 2024, Eberhard W Lisse wrote: I needed to (re-)install footmisc with the tlmgr. El, A fresh installation of TeXLive2024 yesterday should have installed all necessary files. But Lyx has an option of looking at the logfiles. And you did not mention what OS you use, on the Mac

Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

n ptex.log. fmtutil [INFO]: log file copied to: /usr/local/texlive/2024/texmf-var/web2c/euptex/ptex.log fmtutil [INFO]: /usr/local/texlive/2024/texmf-var/web2c/euptex/ptex.fmt installed. fmtutil [ERROR]: running `tex -ini -jobname=lollipop -progname=lollipop lollipop.ini This is e-upTeX, Version 3

Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

On 3/16/24 13:33, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sat, 16 Mar 2024, Paul Rubin wrote: I trust you are leaving LyX open while you look for the temp directory. If you go to Tools > Preferences... > Paths, what do you have filled in for "Temporary directory:"? Paul, /tmp, and that's where I've found

MacTeX/BasicTeX (off of TexLive 2024) on Mac Sonoma 14.4 Silicon

I upgraded through Homebrew using the basictex cask and had not problems. For some or other reason I have never really figured out how to pass the $SELFAUTOPARENT variable to the environment, but a perl script modifying TEXMFLOCAL = $SELFAUTOPARENT/texlive/texmf-local

Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

On Sat, 16 Mar 2024, Paul Rubin wrote: I trust you are leaving LyX open while you look for the temp directory. If you go to Tools > Preferences... > Paths, what do you have filled in for "Temporary directory:"? Paul, /tmp, and that's where I've found LyX_tempbuf* before. Thanks, Rich --

Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

I needed to (re-)install footmisc with the tlmgr. But Lyx has an option of looking at the logfiles. And you did not mention what OS you use, on the Mac the latest version is automatically symlinked. el On 2024-03-15 22:54, Rich Shepard wrote: > I upgraded TeXLive from 2023 to 2024 and tr

Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

On 3/16/24 11:39, Rich Shepard wrote: On Sat, 16 Mar 2024, Rich Shepard wrote: The first place I looked was /tmp/lyx_* but both subdirectories were empty. Just invoked Lyx-2.3.6.1 and tried compiling mwe.lyx using pdflatex. Same message box displayed; image attached. There is no lyx

Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

On Sat, 16 Mar 2024, Rich Shepard wrote: The first place I looked was /tmp/lyx_* but both subdirectories were empty. Just invoked Lyx-2.3.6.1 and tried compiling mwe.lyx using pdflatex. Same message box displayed; image attached. There is no lyx directory in /tmp. All new issues for me.

Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024, Paul Rubin wrote: The log file will be in the temp directory created by LyX for the document. Most likely you'll start spelunking in /tmp, but if you set up the temp directory to be somewhere else you can find out where in Tools > Preferences Paths > Temporary directory.

Re: Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

On 3/15/24 17:54, Rich Shepard wrote: I upgraded TeXLive from 2023 to 2024 and tried compiling the MWE for the math issues still unresolve. A message box displayed: The external program pdflatex finished with an error. It is recommended you fix the cause of the external program's error

Upgraded TeXLive; pdflatex throws an error

I upgraded TeXLive from 2023 to 2024 and tried compiling the MWE for the math issues still unresolve. A message box displayed: The external program pdflatex finished with an error. It is recommended you fix the cause of the external program's error (check the logs). 1. Where do I find

Re: Updating TexLive/2023 [RESOLVED]

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024, Rich Shepard wrote: How do I fix this? By re-installing TeXLive2023. Rich -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Updating TexLive/2023

mgr line 909. Use of uninitialized value $TEXMFDIST in concatenation (.) or string at ./tlmgr line 920. Can't exec "kpsewhich": No such file or directory at /usr/local/texlive/2023/tlpkg/TeXLive/TLUtils.pm line 3514. Use of uninitialized value $tmfsysconf in scalar chomp at /usr/local/te

SOLVED > texlive 2023 > WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO TO GET 2023 WORKING??

schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: do you have a file texlive.sh in /etc/profile.d/. ? If yes, what's its contents. export PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH export MANPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf/doc/man:$MANPATH export INFOPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf/doc/info:$INFOPATH unset

Re: texlive 2023 > WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO TO GET 2023 WORKING??

contents. export PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH export MANPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf/doc/man:$MANPATH export INFOPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf/doc/info:$INFOPATH unset TEXINPUTS unset TEXMFCONFIG as root change it to 2023 /usr/local/texlive/2022/bin/x86_64-linux/tex

Re: texlive 2023 > WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO TO GET 2023 WORKING??

. ? > > > > If yes, what's its contents. > > > > > > export PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH > > > export MANPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf/doc/man:$MANPATH > > > export INFOPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf/doc/info:$INFOPATH > > > un

Re: texlive 2023 > WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO TO GET 2023 WORKING??

Wolfgang Engelmann schrieb: > > > Am 19.06.23 um 15:29 schrieb Herbert Voss: >> >> >> Am 19.06.23 um 15:11 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: >>>> do you have a file texlive.sh in /etc/profile.d/. ? >>>> If yes, what's its contents. >>> &g

Re: texlive 2023 > WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO TO GET 2023 WORKING??

Am 19.06.23 um 15:29 schrieb Herbert Voss: Am 19.06.23 um 15:11 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: do you have a file texlive.sh in /etc/profile.d/. ? If yes, what's its contents. export PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH export MANPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf/doc/man

Re: texlive 2023 > WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO TO GET 2023 WORKING??

Am 19.06.23 um 15:11 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: do you have a file texlive.sh in /etc/profile.d/. ? If yes, what's its contents. export PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH export MANPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf/doc/man:$MANPATH export INFOPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2022

Re: texlive 2023 > WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO TO GET 2023 WORKING??

Am 19.06.23 um 14:26 schrieb Herbert Voss: Am 19.06.23 um 11:14 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: I checked with synaptic in my Debian 5.10179-1 (2023-05-12) > 2020_20210202-3 and with latex -v > Tex Live 2022 and in /usr/local is  /texlive/2022 and /texlive/2023 I have done in my ./p

Re: texlive 2023 > WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO TO GET 2023 WORKING??

Am Montag, dem 19.06.2023 um 11:14 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: > I checked with synaptic in my Debian 5.10179-1 (2023-05-12) >  > 2020_20210202-3 > > and with > latex -v >  > Tex Live 2022 > > and in /usr/local > is  /texlive/2022 and /texlive/2023

Re: texlive 2023 > WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO TO GET 2023 WORKING??

Am 19.06.23 um 11:14 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: I checked with synaptic in my Debian 5.10179-1 (2023-05-12) > 2020_20210202-3 and with latex -v > Tex Live 2022 and in /usr/local is  /texlive/2022 and /texlive/2023 I have done in my ./profile according to (1-) the (2-) do you have

texlive 2023 > WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO TO GET 2023 WORKING??

I checked with synaptic in my Debian 5.10179-1 (2023-05-12) > 2020_20210202-3 and with latex -v > Tex Live 2022 and in /usr/local is /texlive/2022 and /texlive/2023 I have done in my ./profile according to (1-) the (2-) 1- Post-install: setting PATH After the installation finishes, yo

Re: SOLVED > Re: how to tell LyX that there is a 2023 texlive

remove the older version. el On 02/05/2023 18:09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > Am 02.05.23 um 17:42 schrieb José Matos: >> On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 16:43 +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: >>> How can I tell LyX that there is a 2023 texlive which I installed >>> ju

SOLVED > Re: how to tell LyX that there is a 2023 texlive

Am 02.05.23 um 17:42 schrieb José Matos: On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 16:43 +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: How can I tell LyX that there is a 2023 texlive which I installed just now. It is in /usr/local/texlive/2023 and I have the PATHs set in ~/.profile. However, LyX uses still /usr/local

Re: how to tell LyX that there is a 2023 texlive

José Matos said on Tue, 02 May 2023 16:42:17 +0100 >On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 16:43 +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: >> How can I tell LyX that there is a 2023 texlive which I installed >> just now. >> >> It is in >> /usr/local/texlive/2023 >> and I have the

Re: how to tell LyX that there is a 2023 texlive

On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 16:43 +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > How can I tell LyX that there is a 2023 texlive which I installed > just now. > > It is in > /usr/local/texlive/2023 > and I have the PATHs set in ~/.profile. > > However, LyX uses still > /usr/local/texli

how to tell LyX that there is a 2023 texlive

How can I tell LyX that there is a 2023 texlive which I installed just now. It is in /usr/local/texlive/2023 and I have the PATHs set in ~/.profile. However, LyX uses still /usr/local/texlive/2022 Wolfgang -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: which texlive uses my lyx?

On 12/6/22 04:51, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: I have installed the latest texlive tex --version TeX 3.141592653 (TeX Live 2022) in my Debian /usr/local/texlive/2022/ and set the PATH's in .profile How can I find out which texlive uses my lyx Version 2.4.0dev (not released yet) Built from git

which texlive uses my lyx?

I have installed the latest texlive tex --version TeX 3.141592653 (TeX Live 2022) in my Debian /usr/local/texlive/2022/ and set the PATH's in .profile How can I find out which texlive uses my lyx Version 2.4.0dev (not released yet) Built from git commit hash 53ed3dc0 Qt Version (run-time

Re: Installing LyX 2.3.6.1 on Linux MInt 20.3 with TeXLive 2021

On 03/03/2022 22:59, Graeme wrote: I've just done a clean install of Linux Mint 20.3, and then a full install of TeXLive 2021, which cannot be done with the Mint's Synaptic Package Manager. Mint 20.3 includes TeXLive 2019 as part of its distribution, but I have not (yet) installed that version

RE: Installing LyX 2.3.6.1 on Linux MInt 20.3 with TeXLive 2021

> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: lyx-users Namens Graeme via lyx-users > Verzonden: vrijdag 4 maart 2022 00:00 > Aan: lyx-users List > Onderwerp: Installing LyX 2.3.6.1 on Linux MInt 20.3 with TeXLive 2021 > > c) Is there a way to install LyX 2.3.6.1 without i

Re: Installing LyX 2.3.6.1 on Linux MInt 20.3 with TeXLive 2021

Am Donnerstag, dem 03.03.2022 um 22:59 + schrieb Graeme via lyx- users: > I've just done a clean install of Linux Mint 20.3, and then a full > install of TeXLive 2021, which cannot be done with the Mint's > Synaptic > Package Manager. Mint 20.3 includes TeXLive 2019 as

Re: Installing LyX 2.3.6.1 on Linux MInt 20.3 with TeXLive 2021

--- Repost as i answered privately by mistake, so his gets archived --- Quick answers since im on mobile: a) it should, as it works with miktex and other distributions b) apt should recognize every package installed as deb package, so the easiest option is to look for a texlive 2021

Re: Installing LyX 2.3.6.1 on Linux MInt 20.3 with TeXLive 2021

Am Donnerstag, 3. März 2022, 23:59:35 CET schrieb Graeme via lyx-users: > I've just done a clean install of Linux Mint 20.3, and then a full > install of TeXLive 2021, which cannot be done with the Mint's Synaptic > Package Manager. Mint 20.3 includes TeXLive 2019 as part of its >

Installing LyX 2.3.6.1 on Linux MInt 20.3 with TeXLive 2021

I've just done a clean install of Linux Mint 20.3, and then a full install of TeXLive 2021, which cannot be done with the Mint's Synaptic Package Manager. Mint 20.3 includes TeXLive 2019 as part of its distribution, but I have not (yet) installed that version. The standard Plain TeX or LaTeX

Re: texlive and biblatex-spbasic

not run the tlmgr as root then you do not need it for texhash. I prefer always user permissions for texlive. The reason why I did after installtion of texlive: sudo chmod -R voss:voss /usr/local/texlive sudo chmod -R wolfgang:wolfgang /usr/local/texlive/ chmod: Ungültiger Modus

Re: texlive and biblatex-spbasic

gt; then you do not need it for texhash. I prefer always user permissions for > > texlive. The reason why I did after installtion of texlive: > > > > sudo chmod -R voss:voss /usr/local/texlive > > > sudo chmod -R wolfgang:wolfgang /usr/local/texlive/ > chmod: Ungültig

Re: texlive and biblatex-spbasic

Am 20.12.21 um 18:18 schrieb Herbert Voss via lyx-users: Thanks, Herbert, for your help. One more question for chmod which did not work: And if you do not run the tlmgr as root then you do not need it for texhash. I prefer always user permissions for texlive. The reason why I did after

Re: texlive and biblatex-spbasic

Am 20.12.21 um 17:49 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users: I would like to better understand the tree(s) for texlive and what texhash and tlmgr do The important points are found behind the at the end of the mail. Thanks a lot Wolfgang Your installed tlmgr will notice and ask you

texlive and biblatex-spbasic

I would like to better understand the tree(s) for texlive and what texhash and tlmgr do The important points are found behind the at the end of the mail. Thanks a lot Wolfgang Your installed tlmgr will notice and ask you to update it before updating anything else. The command to do

Re: Use different texlive installation

Am Fri, 27 Mar 2020 02:05:56 +0100 schrieb Zelphir Kaltstahl : > > Hello Zelphir, > > I had a similar problem with other window managers, because of not using > > .profile. > > (I use tcsh as a shell) > > I don't know Guix, but it may be the same solution would work for you too. > > 1.) Edit (or

Re: Use different texlive installation

;>>> Hello LyX users! >>>> >>>> I've searched the mailing list archives and found some instructions on >>>> how to change the texlive installation, which LyX uses and added the >>>> following to my `.profile`: >>>> >>>>

Re: Use different texlive installation

earched the mailing list archives and found some instructions on > >> how to change the texlive installation, which LyX uses and added the > >> following to my `.profile`: > >> > >> START > >> ### > >> # texlive ma

Re: Use different texlive installation

On 25.03.20 22:35, lyx-users-requ...@lists.lyx.org wrote: > Am Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:49:45 +0100 > schrieb Zelphir Kaltstahl : > >> Hello LyX users! >> >> I've searched the mailing list archives and found some instructions on >> how to change the texlive insta

Re: Use different texlive installation

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:49:45PM +0100, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > File > "/gnu/store/an9kb3hqk8368b05g39fz4bzrz18khp7-lyx-2.3.3/lyx2.3/share/lyx2.3/configure.py", > line 1327, in processLayoutFile > classdeclaration = (b'"%s" "%s" "%s" "%s" "%s"' > TypeError: %b requires a bytes-like

Re: Use different texlive installation

Am Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:49:45 +0100 schrieb Zelphir Kaltstahl : > Hello LyX users! > > I've searched the mailing list archives and found some instructions on > how to change the texlive installation, which LyX uses and added the > following to my `.profile`:

Use different texlive installation

Hello LyX users! I've searched the mailing list archives and found some instructions on how to change the texlive installation, which LyX uses and added the following to my `.profile`: START ### # texlive manager # ### export MY_TEXLIVE_LOCATION="

Re: texlive 2019 install

I used the TexLive installer rather than the Ubuntu package manager because I wanted to use TLMGR to update the TexxLive packages.  The Ubuntu repositories are notoriously out of date. Ehud Kaplan On 11/7/19 9:48 AM, Helge Hafting wrote: Den 12.10.2019 17:46, skrev UD Kap: In the few times

Re: texlive 2019 install

Den 12.10.2019 17:46, skrev UD Kap: In the few times I had to install TexLive in Linux, it was always a nightmare (paths, privileges, dependencies..), especially to get an installation in which tlmgr was working.  It is frustrating that such an important piece of software doesn't have

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

Le 21/06/2018 à 23:32, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : LyX 2.3.1 (including Win installer) is almost ready. I doubt we will provide a Win installer for 2.3.0. I will provide one, then turn my attention to 2.3.1. I think it is a good idea. Let's solve issues one by one. JMarc

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

On 06/21/2018 04:18 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2018-06-21 9:52 GMT+02:00 Baris Erkus: > > > Is there an ETA for Win version of 2.3.0? :) > > > LyX 2.3.1 (including Win installer) is almost ready. I doubt we will > provide a Win installer for 2.3.0. I will provide one, then turn my

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

t LyX+MiKTeX working on clean Win machine >> mainly because of MiKTeX package handling (and our reconfigure:). >> >> Net TeXLive installer might be better in this regard. (?) >> >> >> Before I will do my own experiments with Win TL 18, any windows users &g

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

On 21-Jun-18 11:18 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2018-06-21 9:52 GMT+02:00 Baris Erkus: Is there an ETA for Win version of 2.3.0? :) LyX 2.3.1 (including Win installer) is almost ready. I doubt we will provide a Win installer for 2.3.0. Jürgen This is even better... Thanks

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

2018-06-21 9:52 GMT+02:00 Baris Erkus: > > Is there an ETA for Win version of 2.3.0? :) > LyX 2.3.1 (including Win installer) is almost ready. I doubt we will provide a Win installer for 2.3.0. Jürgen

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

; 2. the instalation time of first install of MiKTeX (including triggered > online updates via configure) is *horrific*. As I wrote in some earlier > email, it took >1 hour to get LyX+MiKTeX working on clean Win machine > mainly because of MiKTeX package handling (and our r

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

Jürgen you know what :-)-O means? You are of course correct, but, I found it annoying having to do the tlmgr update manually, and the --self doesn't do anything when not necessary, so that's what I have hardwired into tbu () { tlmgr update --self --all brew upgrade && brew cask upgrade

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

2018-06-21 0:01 GMT+02:00 Dr Eberhard Lisse : > Jürgen, > > the correct command is tlmgr update --self --all :-)-O > tlmgr update --all is also correct. --self is only needed in case the tlmgr itself gets an update (you get an warning in that case). Jürgen > > el >

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

Jürgen, the correct command is tlmgr update --self --all :-)-O el On 2018-06-20 17:28 , Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Pavel Sanda mailto:sa...@lyx.org>> schrieb am Mi., 2. TL > is stabilized & freezed. Once all coathors have, say TL 2017, then > >    you can be sure that no packages versions

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

On 06/20/2018 10:28 AM, Kees Zeelenberg wrote: > > >1. increased document interoperability between architectures because both > > >  Linux and Mac use preferably TeX Live (MacTeX is redistribution of > > >  TeX Live if I read their pages right, CMIIW). > >

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

time of first install of MiKTeX (including triggered >>     online updates via configure) is *horrific*. As I wrote in some >> earlier >>     email, it took >1 hour to get LyX+MiKTeX working on clean Win >> machine >>     mainly because of MiKTeX package handling (a

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

On 06/19/2018 09:31 PM, Eric Barkan wrote: > This is in reply to Pavel Sanda's query about Texlive vs. Miktex.  > Sorry, on my Fedora 28 system the "Reply to" button on the Mail > Archive does not seem to work.  I get a blank screen on both Chrome > and Firefox.  I may w

RE: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

>I actually checked that on linux distros under my hands (most importnantly >debian) >before triggering this debate and it turned out that miktex was not by default >in >the repositories, so proper miktex install goes far beyond few clicks > in various package installers... That is indeed a

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

Pavel Sanda schrieb am Mi., 2. TL is stabilized & freezed. Once all coathors have, say TL 2017, then >you can be sure that no packages versions would switch between > computers. >It's much harder to check what version of latex packages are on the >computers when updates randomly

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

Kees Zeelenberg wrote: > >1. increased document interoperability between architectures because both > >Linux and Mac use preferably TeX Live (MacTeX is redistribution of TeX Live > >if I read their pages right, CMIIW). > > Both MikTeX and TeXLive use the same sources, s

RE: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

>1. increased document interoperability between architectures because both > Linux and Mac use preferably TeX Live (MacTeX is redistribution of > TeX Live if I read their pages right, CMIIW). Both MikTeX and TeXLive use the same sources, so there is no functional difference. They on

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

Paul A. Rubin wrote: > As to the points above, for #1, LaTeX packages should behave the same on > all platforms (unless the dreaded Windows line endings somehow muck things > up), so I'm not sure why it would make a difference if I used MiKTeX and my > coauthor used TeXLive. Why i

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

t;1 hour to get LyX+MiKTeX working on clean Win machine mainly because of MiKTeX package handling (and our reconfigure:). Net TeXLive installer might be better in this regard. (?) Before I will do my own experiments with Win TL 18, any windows users around to comment on TeX Live advanta

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

This is in reply to Pavel Sanda's query about Texlive vs. Miktex.  Sorry, on my Fedora 28 system the "Reply to" button on the Mail Archive does not seem to work.  I get a blank screen on both Chrome and Firefox.  I may well be doing something wrong... Anyway, I owe great thanks

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

get LyX+MiKTeX working on clean Win machine mainly because of MiKTeX package handling (and our reconfigure:). Net TeXLive installer might be better in this regard. (?) Protext is a MiKTeX installer built from TL: once the 2.6Go are downloaded (time depends linearly upon the speed of the

Re: Windows + TeXLive + LyX 2.3.0

figure) is *horrific*. As I wrote in some earlier email, it took >1 hour to get LyX+MiKTeX working on clean Win machine mainly because of MiKTeX package handling (and our reconfigure:). Net TeXLive installer might be better in this regard. (?) Before I will do my own experiments with

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

Am Montag, den 19.03.2018, 13:16 +0100 schrieb Michael Berger: > Dear Jürgen, > I am back now to answer your questions: > - Was the file your son created a pure LaTeX file? >> Yes! > - I take it that you imported it into LyX. >> Yes! > And yes again, it is a Beamer presentation and that probably

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

Dear Jürgen, I am back now to answer your questions: - Was the file your son created a pure LaTeX file? >> Yes! - I take it that you imported it into LyX. >> Yes! And yes again, it is a Beamer presentation and that probably explains what I am facing here. I recall that I could indeed open

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

2018-03-12 18:00 GMT+01:00 Richard Heck: > On 03/12/2018 12:39 PM, Michael Berger wrote: > > Thanks Richard, > > my son is using Windows 10, not Lyx. But I learned from Kornel and Uwe > that his file should nevertheless compile if opened in LyX. Did I get > something wrong here?:-( > > > Was the

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

Well Kornel and Richard, that makes it very clear. Sorry for the noise and my unprofessional questioning. Michael On 12.03.2018 17:46, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Montag, 12. März 2018 17:39:33 CET schrieb Michael Berger : Thanks Richard, my son is using Windows 10, not Lyx.

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

On 03/12/2018 12:39 PM, Michael Berger wrote: > > Thanks Richard, > > my son is using Windows 10, not Lyx. But I learned from Kornel and Uwe > that his file should nevertheless compile if opened in LyX. Did I get > something wrong here?:-( > Was the file your son created a pure LaTeX file? Or was

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

Am Montag, 12. März 2018 17:39:33 CET schrieb Michael Berger : > Thanks Richard, > > my son is using Windows 10, not Lyx. But I learned from Kornel and Uwe > that his file should nevertheless compile if opened in LyX. Did I get > something wrong here?:-( Seems so. The structure

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

Thanks Richard, my son is using Windows 10, not Lyx. But I learned from Kornel and Uwe that his file should nevertheless compile if opened in LyX. Did I get something wrong here?:-( Michael On 12.03.2018 16:54, Richard Heck wrote: On 03/12/2018 08:12 AM, Michael Berger wrote: Hello Uwe,

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

On 03/12/2018 08:12 AM, Michael Berger wrote: > > Hello Uwe, Kornel, thanks for offering your help. > > My son created this Beamer file under Windows 10 on his Laptop and > presented it to an audience just a few days ago without facing any > problem. However, on my desktop, Lyx 2.2.3, Mageia 6, it

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

bly you do not have certain packages installed, though I gather >> that MiKTeX is >> supposed to install them on the fly. > > It is the other way round: document produced with miktex but read with > texlive. But your advice it correct about log file is still fine! Oh, whoops, yes. In that case, we definitely need to log file. Richard

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

. What am I getting wrong here? Sorry, I am just an ordinary layman! Probably you do not have certain packages installed, though I gather that MiKTeX is supposed to install them on the fly. It is the other way round: document produced with miktex but read with texlive. But your advice it correct

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

, >>> >>> is there a way to convert a LyX document made with MikTeX (Windows) >>> in a >>> LyX TeXLive (Linux) document? >>> >>> Thanks and best, >>> >>> Michael >> There should be no difference regarding lyx. >> Documents are written by lyx, not be MikTeX or TeXLive. >> Even exported to latex source is the same on all platforms. >> >> Kornel >

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

On 11.03.2018 17:38, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sonntag, 11. März 2018 17:30:30 CET schrieb Michael Berger <id...@online.de>: Dear Lyx users, is there a way to convert a LyX document made with MikTeX (Windows) in a LyX TeXLive (Linux) document? Thanks and best, Michael There should be no difference reg

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

Am Sonntag, 11. März 2018 17:30:30 CET schrieb Michael Berger <id...@online.de>: > Dear Lyx users, > > is there a way to convert a LyX document made with MikTeX (Windows) in a > LyX TeXLive (Linux) document? > > Thanks and best, > > Michael There should

Re: Miktex vs Texlive

On 03/11/2018 12:30 PM, Michael Berger wrote: Dear Lyx users, is there a way to convert a LyX document made with MikTeX (Windows) in a LyX TeXLive (Linux) document? Thanks and best, Michael A LyX document is agnostic to the particular LaTeX distribution you use. As long as you have

Miktex vs Texlive

Dear Lyx users, is there a way to convert a LyX document made with MikTeX (Windows) in a LyX TeXLive (Linux) document? Thanks and best, Michael

RE: texlive or miktech

6:05:41 PM To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: texlive or miktech Which one is recommendable for the beginner: texlive or miktech? It should contain texlive-extra and/or texlive-publishers Wolfgang

Re: texlive or miktex

Someone mentioned an issue of installing additional texlive packages in Linux; but, as a Fedora user, I don't recall any problems in doing this, so I infer that the answer as to which to use may be somewhat a function of which Linux distro one uses, if Linux is one of the OSs. When I

Re: texlive or miktech

On 03/02/2018 10:05 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Which one is recommendable for the beginner: texlive or miktech? It should contain texlive-extra and/or texlive-publishers Wolfgang Contrary to Ehud's opinion, I'd go with MiKTeX on Windows (probably TeXLive on Linux). For background, I

Re: texlive or miktech

Like others, I have been using TexLive for years now (since it replaced EmTex), because it runs the same under Windows (which I still use sometime) and Linux (which I use most of the time).  I also find that maintaining and updating using TexLive is easier than using

Re: texlive or miktech

On Fri, 2 Mar 2018, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Windows. (I ask for somebody else. I am on Linux) Wolfgang, Oh. Then I have no idea. Regards, Rich

RE: texlive or miktech

Interesting question (miktech vs. texlive). Additional consideration: * I have installed Inkscape and try to use this drawing tool instead of Visio * My current Inkscape installation allows me to insert TeX math and have it converted to a curve/object in Inkscape -- which I can then scale

Re: texlive or miktech

Am 02.03.2018 um 16:21 schrieb Rich Shepard: On Fri, 2 Mar 2018, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Which one is recommendable for the beginner: texlive or miktech? It should contain texlive-extra and/or texlive-publishers Wolfgang,   What platform (OS)?   I've been running texlive since

Re: texlive or miktech

On Fri, 2 Mar 2018, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Which one is recommendable for the beginner: texlive or miktech? It should contain texlive-extra and/or texlive-publishers Wolfgang, What platform (OS)? I've been running texlive since it replaced tetex and recommend it despite my lack

texlive or miktech

Which one is recommendable for the beginner: texlive or miktech? It should contain texlive-extra and/or texlive-publishers Wolfgang

Re: texlive and pyxplot > SOLVED

bingen.de> For getting texlive 2017 in my Debian Jessie installed I have removed my old 2016 texlive . This removed also pyxplot. If I try to reinstall it via synaptic or apt, the system wants to install texlive and other packages, which are already in my texlive (/usr/local/texlive/2017/...), see >

Re: texlive and pyxplot

Am Montag, 28. August 2017 um 14:50:47, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann <engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> > > Am 28.08.2017 um 09:51 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Am Montag, 28. August 2017 um 09:25:50, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann > > <engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> > >>

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >