Sven Schreiber wrote:
In contrast, the way you describe it, it sounds wonderful: Skip the
manual pdf-graphics-creation and just have lyx/imagemagick create the
necessary png's on the fly. Just need one .eps (like in the old
days...). That is/would be great!
It is like that also in 1.3, but:
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg This problem has been discussed several times
Georg before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg now nobody came up with such a beast.
I guess the
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Georg Baum wrote:
I meant: which wiki page should it be added to?
I don't know. Put it where you think it fits, if it turns out that there is
a better place people will move it.
If you create a new wiki page (anybody is welcome to do that) then please
remember to edit
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg This problem has been discussed several times
Georg before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg now nobody came up with
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Good point about the bitmap thing, I'm definitely a vector fan. After
looking a little at the devel mailing archives to get an idea of the
discussion: I may be wrong, but could it be that people wrongly equate
pdf=vector?
No, at least I can't remember people doing that.
Georg Baum wrote:
And this is the problem: Since converters are user definable, we don't know
wether a given eps - pdf conversion retains vector data or not.
Ok, now (I think) I understand.
True, but the optimal solution that should be implemented some day would be
to retain vector data.
But this
Sven Schreiber wrote:
In contrast, the way you describe it, it sounds wonderful: Skip the
manual pdf-graphics-creation and just have lyx/imagemagick create the
necessary png's on the fly. Just need one .eps (like in the old
days...). That is/would be great!
It is like that also in 1.3, but:
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg This problem has been discussed several times
Georg before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg now nobody came up with such a beast.
I guess the
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Georg Baum wrote:
I meant: which wiki page should it be added to?
I don't know. Put it where you think it fits, if it turns out that there is
a better place people will move it.
If you create a new wiki page (anybody is welcome to do that) then please
remember to edit
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg This problem has been discussed several times
Georg before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg now nobody came up with
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Good point about the bitmap thing, I'm definitely a vector fan. After
looking a little at the devel mailing archives to get an idea of the
discussion: I may be wrong, but could it be that people wrongly equate
pdf=vector?
No, at least I can't remember people doing that.
Georg Baum wrote:
And this is the problem: Since converters are user definable, we don't know
wether a given eps - pdf conversion retains vector data or not.
Ok, now (I think) I understand.
True, but the optimal solution that should be implemented some day would be
to retain vector data.
But this
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> In contrast, the way you describe it, it sounds wonderful: Skip the
> manual pdf-graphics-creation and just have lyx/imagemagick create the
> necessary png's on the fly. Just need one .eps (like in the old
> days...). That is/would be great!
It is like that also in 1.3,
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> This problem has been discussed several times
Georg> before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg> wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg> now nobody came up with such a beast.
I
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Georg Baum wrote:
> > I meant: which wiki page should it be added to?
>
> I don't know. Put it where you think it fits, if it turns out that there is
> a better place people will move it.
If you create a new wiki page (anybody is welcome to do that) then please
remember to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> This problem has been discussed several times
Georg> before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg> wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg> now nobody came up
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Good point about the bitmap thing, I'm definitely a vector fan. After
> looking a little at the devel mailing archives to get an idea of the
> discussion: I may be wrong, but could it be that people wrongly equate
> pdf=vector?
No, at least I can't remember people doing
Georg Baum wrote:
And this is the problem: Since converters are user definable, we don't know
wether a given eps -> pdf conversion retains vector data or not.
Ok, now (I think) I understand.
True, but the optimal solution that should be implemented some day would be
to retain vector data.
But this
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Angus, for your reply to my question. Meanwhile, I had the
idea of installing LyX 1.4 cvs and getting tex2lyx. Afterwards, can I
get back to LyX 1.3.5 and using tex2lyx without LyX 1.4? Does my idea
make some sense?
Here's what I did on Windows.
Checked out the LyX
On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
Here's what I did on Windows.
Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+ messages
did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
Is it possible to use tex2lyx and lyx2lyx with LyX 1.3.4 on Linux?
Are these scripts standalone
G. Milde wrote:
On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
Here's what I did on Windows.
Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+
messages did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
You can't *find* it. Read my reply to the original question.
http
Georg Baum wrote:
- I use pdflatex but don't specify the .pdf-extension so that I can
switch to normal latex (using .eps) seamlessly; tex2lyx applies a
definite choice, thereby destroying this nice portability. Why?
Because LyX 1.4 _always_ needs the extension: There is always one master
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
Because LyX 1.4 _always_ needs the extension: There is always one
master version of the graphic that is referenced in the .lyx file. The
others are created by the converter mechanism from the master file if
needed. LyX will not output the extension in
Georg Baum wrote:
No. The master graphics is used as master for everything. Consider the
following situation: The LyX file includes a figure a.xyz. Converters
exist from xyz - eps and xyz - png. The .tex file contains always
\includegraphics{a} (actually almost always, if you want to know the
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Angus, for your reply to my question. Meanwhile, I had the
idea of installing LyX 1.4 cvs and getting tex2lyx. Afterwards, can I
get back to LyX 1.3.5 and using tex2lyx without LyX 1.4? Does my idea
make some sense?
Here's what I did on Windows.
Checked out the LyX
On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
Here's what I did on Windows.
Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+ messages
did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
Is it possible to use tex2lyx and lyx2lyx with LyX 1.3.4 on Linux?
Are these scripts standalone
G. Milde wrote:
On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
Here's what I did on Windows.
Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+
messages did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
You can't *find* it. Read my reply to the original question.
http
Georg Baum wrote:
- I use pdflatex but don't specify the .pdf-extension so that I can
switch to normal latex (using .eps) seamlessly; tex2lyx applies a
definite choice, thereby destroying this nice portability. Why?
Because LyX 1.4 _always_ needs the extension: There is always one master
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
Because LyX 1.4 _always_ needs the extension: There is always one
master version of the graphic that is referenced in the .lyx file. The
others are created by the converter mechanism from the master file if
needed. LyX will not output the extension in
Georg Baum wrote:
No. The master graphics is used as master for everything. Consider the
following situation: The LyX file includes a figure a.xyz. Converters
exist from xyz - eps and xyz - png. The .tex file contains always
\includegraphics{a} (actually almost always, if you want to know the
Paul Smith wrote:
> Thanks, Angus, for your reply to my question. Meanwhile, I had the
> idea of installing LyX 1.4 cvs and getting tex2lyx. Afterwards, can I
> get back to LyX 1.3.5 and using tex2lyx without LyX 1.4? Does my idea
> make some sense?
Here's what I did on Windows.
Checked out the
On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> Here's what I did on Windows.
Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+ messages
did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
Is it possible to use tex2lyx and lyx2lyx with LyX 1.3.4 on Linux?
Are these scripts stan
G. Milde wrote:
> On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
>>
>> Here's what I did on Windows.
>
> Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+
> messages did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
You can't *find* it. Read my reply to the ori
Georg Baum wrote:
- I use pdflatex but don't specify the .pdf-extension so that I can
switch to normal latex (using .eps) seamlessly; tex2lyx applies a
definite choice, thereby destroying this nice portability. Why?
Because LyX 1.4 _always_ needs the extension: There is always one "master"
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>> Because LyX 1.4 _always_ needs the extension: There is always one
>> "master" version of the graphic that is referenced in the .lyx file. The
>> others are created by the converter mechanism from the master file if
>> needed. LyX will not output the
Georg Baum wrote:
No. The master graphics is used as master for everything. Consider the
following situation: The LyX file includes a figure "a.xyz". Converters
exist from xyz -> eps and xyz -> png. The .tex file contains always
\includegraphics{a} (actually almost always, if you want to know the
Dear All
I remember Angus has recently produced a version of tex2lyx for MS
Windows. Is there a Linux version of it to run autonomously, that is,
without having LyX 1.4 cvs installed?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
I would be interested too.. I would also be interested
in a tex2lyx standalone (ie. would run without one
having lyx in his system) if this is possible. I just
downloaded Angus's tex2lyx but Im not sure if it works
for window users who installed lyx using cygwin (I
didnt tried other lyx versions
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All
I remember Angus has recently produced a version of tex2lyx for MS
Windows. Is there a Linux version of it to run autonomously, that is,
without having LyX 1.4 cvs installed?
No, because different flavours of linux have different run time libraries
and a single
Jose Capco wrote:
I would be interested too.. I would also be interested
in a tex2lyx standalone (ie. would run without one
having lyx in his system) if this is possible. I just
downloaded Angus's tex2lyx but Im not sure if it works
for window users who installed lyx using cygwin (I
didnt
No! In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
to test this and it didnt worked
I installed the windows port in C:\Lyx directory.. and
then extracted the file in the tex2lyx zipfile you
posted today to their respective paths and then after
running I got something like
--
Unable to
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 13:31, you wrote:
No!
Ach!
In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
to test this and it didnt worked
Why did you think you needed this?
I installed the windows port in C:\Lyx directory.. and
then extracted the file in the tex2lyx zipfile you
In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
to test this and it didnt worked
Why did you think you needed this?
you told me that the cygwin thingy isn't recognized.
Just a second. tex2lyx expects to find the support
files in a
directory ..\Resources\lyx relative to the
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 15:58, Jose Capco wrote:
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\LyX\Resources\lyx\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx, line
19, in ?
import getopt
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this was the
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 15:58, Jose Capco wrote:
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\LyX\Resources\lyx\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx, line
19, in ?
import getopt
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this
Sven Schreiber wrote:
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this was the result of a bad or incomplete
python installation.
Actually it's the stripped-down python version always installed by the
LyxWin package. Due to PATH settings it can get called even though a
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sven Schreiber wrote:
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this was the result of a bad or incomplete
python installation.
Actually it's the stripped-down python version always installed by the
LyxWin package. Due to PATH settings it can get called
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 16:58 schrieb Jose Capco:
I didn't understand your example, I was however able
to read the output lyx using the recent available
version , I'm not sure if it would be looking the same
had I lyx2lyxed it... it looks .. er not bad if I
don't don't use packages in my
ok great.. so I'll just wait until the 1.4.x comes up
and the python er... anyway I'll just let 1.3.x import
the 1.4.x lyxs which are still readable (but
probably... Im not sure though, that after relyxing
things would look better).
and also, if the owner of this mailing list also reads
this...
I'd love to be the guinea pig.. the boss cant write
with LaTeX and this is the only way out. I'll send
feedbacks.
Jose Capco
PS: I'll try experimenting on importing packages and
using \newcommands on the preamble.. if anyone knows
that this work then please advise.
--- Georg Baum [EMAIL
Sven Schreiber wrote:
btw, another thing I very much appreciate is your tex2lyx snapshot. In
fact I am using it right now to avoid my earlier relyx-problems. What
I'm not sure about: Would you like users (like me) to give feedback now,
or will testing start later on?
Feedback is good. Apart
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sven Schreiber wrote:
btw, another thing I very much appreciate is your tex2lyx snapshot. In
fact I am using it right now to avoid my earlier relyx-problems. What
I'm not sure about: Would you like users (like me) to give feedback now,
or will testing start later on?
Feedback
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 19:03 schrieb Jose Capco:
and also, if the owner of this mailing list also reads
this... could you please setup the listbot to send the
emails so that when I hit the reply button it will
send to the list rather than the individul users (I
think that is possible,
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Overall I'm quite impressed! But it still required some corrections
afterwards, although I suspect some problems may be windows-specific
(e.g. because of line-ending characters -- although I used an editor to
try both unixish and windowsish settings without any
Thanks, Angus, for your reply to my question. Meanwhile, I had the
idea of installing LyX 1.4 cvs and getting tex2lyx. Afterwards, can I
get back to LyX 1.3.5 and using tex2lyx without LyX 1.4? Does my idea
make some sense?
Paul
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 20:37 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
- complains when \includegraphics* (starred variant) is used, while it
could just be treated as the unstarred version (or am I missing
something?)
\includegraphics* is equivalent to \includegraphics[clip]. I implemented
Dear All
I remember Angus has recently produced a version of tex2lyx for MS
Windows. Is there a Linux version of it to run autonomously, that is,
without having LyX 1.4 cvs installed?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
I would be interested too.. I would also be interested
in a tex2lyx standalone (ie. would run without one
having lyx in his system) if this is possible. I just
downloaded Angus's tex2lyx but Im not sure if it works
for window users who installed lyx using cygwin (I
didnt tried other lyx versions
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All
I remember Angus has recently produced a version of tex2lyx for MS
Windows. Is there a Linux version of it to run autonomously, that is,
without having LyX 1.4 cvs installed?
No, because different flavours of linux have different run time libraries
and a single
Jose Capco wrote:
I would be interested too.. I would also be interested
in a tex2lyx standalone (ie. would run without one
having lyx in his system) if this is possible. I just
downloaded Angus's tex2lyx but Im not sure if it works
for window users who installed lyx using cygwin (I
didnt
No! In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
to test this and it didnt worked
I installed the windows port in C:\Lyx directory.. and
then extracted the file in the tex2lyx zipfile you
posted today to their respective paths and then after
running I got something like
--
Unable to
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 13:31, you wrote:
No!
Ach!
In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
to test this and it didnt worked
Why did you think you needed this?
I installed the windows port in C:\Lyx directory.. and
then extracted the file in the tex2lyx zipfile you
In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
to test this and it didnt worked
Why did you think you needed this?
you told me that the cygwin thingy isn't recognized.
Just a second. tex2lyx expects to find the support
files in a
directory ..\Resources\lyx relative to the
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 15:58, Jose Capco wrote:
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\LyX\Resources\lyx\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx, line
19, in ?
import getopt
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this was the
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 15:58, Jose Capco wrote:
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\LyX\Resources\lyx\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx, line
19, in ?
import getopt
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this
Sven Schreiber wrote:
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this was the result of a bad or incomplete
python installation.
Actually it's the stripped-down python version always installed by the
LyxWin package. Due to PATH settings it can get called even though a
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sven Schreiber wrote:
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this was the result of a bad or incomplete
python installation.
Actually it's the stripped-down python version always installed by the
LyxWin package. Due to PATH settings it can get called
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 16:58 schrieb Jose Capco:
I didn't understand your example, I was however able
to read the output lyx using the recent available
version , I'm not sure if it would be looking the same
had I lyx2lyxed it... it looks .. er not bad if I
don't don't use packages in my
ok great.. so I'll just wait until the 1.4.x comes up
and the python er... anyway I'll just let 1.3.x import
the 1.4.x lyxs which are still readable (but
probably... Im not sure though, that after relyxing
things would look better).
and also, if the owner of this mailing list also reads
this...
I'd love to be the guinea pig.. the boss cant write
with LaTeX and this is the only way out. I'll send
feedbacks.
Jose Capco
PS: I'll try experimenting on importing packages and
using \newcommands on the preamble.. if anyone knows
that this work then please advise.
--- Georg Baum [EMAIL
Sven Schreiber wrote:
btw, another thing I very much appreciate is your tex2lyx snapshot. In
fact I am using it right now to avoid my earlier relyx-problems. What
I'm not sure about: Would you like users (like me) to give feedback now,
or will testing start later on?
Feedback is good. Apart
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sven Schreiber wrote:
btw, another thing I very much appreciate is your tex2lyx snapshot. In
fact I am using it right now to avoid my earlier relyx-problems. What
I'm not sure about: Would you like users (like me) to give feedback now,
or will testing start later on?
Feedback
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 19:03 schrieb Jose Capco:
and also, if the owner of this mailing list also reads
this... could you please setup the listbot to send the
emails so that when I hit the reply button it will
send to the list rather than the individul users (I
think that is possible,
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Overall I'm quite impressed! But it still required some corrections
afterwards, although I suspect some problems may be windows-specific
(e.g. because of line-ending characters -- although I used an editor to
try both unixish and windowsish settings without any
Thanks, Angus, for your reply to my question. Meanwhile, I had the
idea of installing LyX 1.4 cvs and getting tex2lyx. Afterwards, can I
get back to LyX 1.3.5 and using tex2lyx without LyX 1.4? Does my idea
make some sense?
Paul
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 20:37 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
- complains when \includegraphics* (starred variant) is used, while it
could just be treated as the unstarred version (or am I missing
something?)
\includegraphics* is equivalent to \includegraphics[clip]. I implemented
Dear All
I remember Angus has recently produced a version of tex2lyx for MS
Windows. Is there a Linux version of it to run autonomously, that is,
without having LyX 1.4 cvs installed?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
I would be interested too.. I would also be interested
in a tex2lyx standalone (ie. would run without one
having lyx in his system) if this is possible. I just
downloaded Angus's tex2lyx but Im not sure if it works
for window users who installed lyx using cygwin (I
didnt tried other lyx versions
Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I remember Angus has recently produced a version of tex2lyx for MS
> Windows. Is there a Linux version of it to run autonomously, that is,
> without having LyX 1.4 cvs installed?
No, because different flavours of linux have different run time libraries
and a
Jose Capco wrote:
> I would be interested too.. I would also be interested
> in a tex2lyx standalone (ie. would run without one
> having lyx in his system) if this is possible. I just
> downloaded Angus's tex2lyx but Im not sure if it works
> for window users who installed lyx using cygwin (I
>
No! In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
to test this and it didnt worked
I installed the windows port in C:\Lyx directory.. and
then extracted the file in the tex2lyx zipfile you
posted today to their respective paths and then after
running I got something like
--
Unable to
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 13:31, you wrote:
> No!
Ach!
> In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
> to test this and it didnt worked
Why did you think you needed this?
> I installed the windows port in C:\Lyx directory.. and
> then extracted the file in the tex2lyx zipfile you
>
> > In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
>
> > to test this and it didnt worked
>
> Why did you think you needed this?
you told me that the cygwin thingy isn't recognized.
> Just a second. tex2lyx expects to find the support
> files in a
> directory ..\Resources\lyx relative to
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 15:58, Jose Capco wrote:
> 'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\LyX\Resources\lyx\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx", line
> 19, in ?
> import getopt
> ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 15:58, Jose Capco wrote:
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\LyX\Resources\lyx\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx", line
19, in ?
import getopt
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error
Sven Schreiber wrote:
>>>ImportError: No module named getopt
>>
>> Last time we saw this error this was the result of a bad or incomplete
>> python installation.
>>
> Actually it's the stripped-down python version always installed by the
> LyxWin package. Due to PATH settings it can get called
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sven Schreiber wrote:
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this was the result of a bad or incomplete
python installation.
Actually it's the stripped-down python version always installed by the
LyxWin package. Due to PATH settings it can get called
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 16:58 schrieb Jose Capco:
> I didn't understand your example, I was however able
> to read the output lyx using the recent available
> version , I'm not sure if it would be looking the same
> had I lyx2lyxed it... it looks .. er not bad if I
> don't don't use packages
ok great.. so I'll just wait until the 1.4.x comes up
and the python er... anyway I'll just let 1.3.x import
the 1.4.x lyxs which are still readable (but
probably... Im not sure though, that after relyxing
things would look better).
and also, if the owner of this mailing list also reads
this...
I'd love to be the guinea pig.. the boss cant write
with LaTeX and this is the only way out. I'll send
feedbacks.
Jose Capco
PS: I'll try experimenting on importing packages and
using \newcommands on the preamble.. if anyone knows
that this work then please advise.
--- Georg Baum <[EMAIL
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> btw, another thing I very much appreciate is your tex2lyx snapshot. In
> fact I am using it right now to avoid my earlier relyx-problems. What
> I'm not sure about: Would you like users (like me) to give feedback now,
> or will testing start later on?
Feedback is good.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sven Schreiber wrote:
btw, another thing I very much appreciate is your tex2lyx snapshot. In
fact I am using it right now to avoid my earlier relyx-problems. What
I'm not sure about: Would you like users (like me) to give feedback now,
or will testing start later on?
Feedback
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 19:03 schrieb Jose Capco:
> and also, if the owner of this mailing list also reads
> this... could you please setup the listbot to send the
> emails so that when I hit the reply button it will
> send to the list rather than the individul users (I
> think that is
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Overall I'm quite impressed! But it still required some corrections
afterwards, although I suspect some problems may be windows-specific
(e.g. because of line-ending characters -- although I used an editor to
try both unixish and windowsish settings without any
Thanks, Angus, for your reply to my question. Meanwhile, I had the
idea of installing LyX 1.4 cvs and getting tex2lyx. Afterwards, can I
get back to LyX 1.3.5 and using tex2lyx without LyX 1.4? Does my idea
make some sense?
Paul
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 20:37 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
> - complains when \includegraphics* (starred variant) is used, while it
> could just be treated as the unstarred version (or am I missing
something?)
\includegraphics* is equivalent to \includegraphics[clip]. I implemented
96 matches
Mail list logo
