On 2/3/23 10:16, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Riki, wouldn't it make sense to delete the whole theorem style
"acknowledgement"
extension from LyX?
Jürgen had proposed removing it, but adding relevant code to local
layout if it's detected. That would be fine with me.
Riki
--
lyx-users ma
nt, just before the references. Of course, in the end the
>> journal uses their own style.
>> Hal
>
> No, this is misunderstanding.
> You use Acknowledgments in the traditional sense as unnumbered section at the
> end of the paper.
> What I'm talking about is that we currently also offer numbere
s misunderstanding.
You use Acknowledgments in the traditional sense as unnumbered section at the
end of the paper.
What I'm talking about is that we currently also offer numbered "theorem-style"
acknowledgments,
i.e. you could have it multiplte times as many subsections in the paper.
I don't thi
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:34:19AM -0700, Hal Kierstead via lyx-users wrote:
> I use this for most papers in the sense (a). Why delete it? Note that
> ???Acknowledgment??? is suggested in the amsthm instructions???just like
> ???Lemma".
Ha :)
Can you point me to any paper of yours, where this
> On Feb 3, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:13:32PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
>> "AMS extended"
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:13:32PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
> "AMS extended" theorems modules. This is a question for people using
> this.
...
&g
Am Mittwoch, dem 01.02.2023 um 16:13 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> If you use or are familiar with the Acknowledgment theorem type: what
> are its general purposes, or how do you use it?
Clarification comes from AMS technical support (thanks Pavel for
approachin
On 2/1/23 14:37, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 2/02/2023 4:13 am, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Dear all,
As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
"AMS extended" theorems modules. This is a question for people using
this.
The issue appeared on
On 2/02/2023 4:13 am, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Dear all,
As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
"AMS extended" theorems modules. This is a question for people using
this.
The issue appeared on the developers list that none of us is
Dear all,
As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
"AMS extended" theorems modules. This is a question for people using
this.
The issue appeared on the developers list that none of us is actually
sure about the function of this theorem typ
On 24/07/2021 9:00 am, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
On 7/23/21 4:14 PM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Is there a way to instruct Lyx to write certain auxiliary files into
the local directory, instead of in /tmp/lyx_tmpdirxxx?
Is it LyX or LaTeX (pdflatex?) that writes the auxiliary files? I
suspect the
On 7/23/21 4:14 PM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Is there a way to instruct Lyx to write certain auxiliary files into
the local directory, instead of in /tmp/lyx_tmpdirxxx?
Is it LyX or LaTeX (pdflatex?) that writes the auxiliary files? I
suspect the latter, in which case I'm pretty sure the answer
ecture.
So, inside the InPreamble, I registered all theorem counters.
Two problems resulted:
1. I got a lot of "!Missing number, treated as zero" errors.
2. If I ignore the errors and finish the processing, the total counters of the
environs that
are NOT used in the document are written
oblems came up and
I'd like to have your opinion.
What I want to do is the following: I'm preparing a series of lectures
that will employ theorem-like environments.
Several lectures are related to the same subject and so I want the
enumeration of numbered things (equations, figures, th
of lectures that
will employ
theorem-like environments.
Several lectures are related to the same subject and so I want the enumeration
of
numbered things (equations, figures, theorems, examples, definitions, etc) in
subsequent
lectures to continue from the previous ones.
In order to guarantee
user interface uses a language other than English, just give your custom
> theorem environment a layout name in that language. If your new environment
> makes its way into the LyX distribution some day, then it will need
> translations into all supported languages.
>
> As far as impl
(Accidentally replied directly rather than to the list. Better late than
never?)
I can see no reason to mess with the layout translations file. If your
LyX user interface uses a language other than English, just give your
custom theorem environment a layout name in that language. If your new
if this solution is sanctioned by you LyX developers...
Now the question I want to ask.
I want to create a new theorem-like environment. Reading through the
Customization.lyx
manual, I understand that the different translations for the names of the
environs reside
in the layouttranslations file
Well, it seems that the solution is indeed via \renewtheorem. However, I had
to dig deep
into the installation of AMS theorem to find the proper names of the counters.
So far, I've found \thethm, \thelem, \thedefn, etc.
I did not find a full list of counters, so if someone could point me out
Hi there.
I'm using the module Theorems (AMS, Numbered by Type).
I would like to change the counters of theorem-like environs, adding a fixed
string in front
of the number. Something like
Theorem TGA-1
Definition TGA-2
etc
Can I do that the usual way that is done for the standard LaTeX
On 7/26/19 2:22 PM, Marius Shekow wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that when adding some theorem module (in the document
settings), there are many new environments available in the layout
dropdown menu, such as Corollary or Theorem. However, for some reason
you forgot (?) /axiom/, which is a bit
Hi,
I've noticed that when adding some theorem module (in the document
settings), there are many new environments available in the layout
dropdown menu, such as Corollary or Theorem. However, for some reason
you forgot (?) /axiom/, which is a bit funny, given that it is the most
basic element
{\casename}{案例}
\providecommand{\theoremname}{定理}
I guess it's probably why it's not dealt with by the cjk package.
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018, 11:48 Erik Apostol (Che-hsiu Cheng) <
erikapos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm using LyX 2.2.3, and I found that theorem names, such as theorem,
> case, remark
On 09.09.2018 21:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 09:46:15AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Ah no, I just open the .lyx file and click on the eyes icon. Or
equivalently, I go to File > Export > PDF (pdflatex).
I use a script that installs TeX Live directly (rather than
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 09:46:15AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > Ah no, I just open the .lyx file and click on the eyes icon. Or
> > equivalently, I go to File > Export > PDF (pdflatex).
> >
> > I use a script that installs TeX Live directly (rather than through the
> > TeX Live repos),
but the theorem names are still garbled.
Ah no, I just open the .lyx file and click on the eyes icon. Or
equivalently, I go to File > Export > PDF (pdflatex).
I use a script that installs TeX Live directly (rather than through the
TeX Live repos), which does a little bit of magic/h
yx file via the option LaTeX (plain)
> > and then compiled the resultant .tex file in a terminal? I do so in my
> > Ubuntu 18.04 but the theorem names are still garbled.
>
> Ah no, I just open the .lyx file and click on the eyes icon. Or
> equivalently, I go to File > Export >
e
is between our systems.
> > That's what I get on Ubuntu with TeX Live,
> > without changing anything in your .lyx file.
>
> Do you mean you exported the .lyx file via the option LaTeX (plain)
> and then compiled the resultant .tex file in a terminal? I do so in my
>
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:55 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 11:48:13AM +0800, Erik Apostol (Che-hsiu Cheng) wrote:
> > I'm using LyX 2.2.3, and I found that theorem names, such as theorem, case,
> > remark, in Chinese are not shown correctly. For example,
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 11:48:13AM +0800, Erik Apostol (Che-hsiu Cheng) wrote:
> I'm using LyX 2.2.3, and I found that theorem names, such as theorem, case,
> remark, in Chinese are not shown correctly. For example, I have a .lyx file
> with content
>
> > 定理 1. 一二三四五
> > 案
I'm using LyX 2.2.3, and I found that theorem names, such as theorem, case,
remark, in Chinese are not shown correctly. For example, I have a .lyx file
with content
> 定理 1. 一二三四五
> 案例 1. 六七八九十
>
>
> 備註 2. 十一時二十三
>
in which 定理 is the Theorem environment, 案例 is the Case e
t; wrote:
>>
>> On 07/23/2016 12:06 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote:
>>> How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text? I am
>>> using 2.2.0.
>> Does "Alt-A 1" work? This is the default here. Look under
>> "argument-insert" for the bindings.
>>
>> Richard
>>
Thanks, I got it. This should be very useful in the future.
Hal
> On Jul 23, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 09:06:51AM -0700, Hal Kierstead wrote:
>> How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text?
Thanks, this worked. Should I have been able to figure this out on my own? I
did try using the manuals.
Hal
> On Jul 23, 2016, at 9:51 AM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote:
>
> On 07/23/2016 12:06 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote:
>> How do I bind a key combination to insert ad
On 07/23/2016 12:06 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote:
> How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text? I am using
> 2.2.0.
Does "Alt-A 1" work? This is the default here. Look under
"argument-insert" for the bindings.
Richard
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 09:06:51AM -0700, Hal Kierstead wrote:
> How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text? I am using
> 2.2.0.
The following SE answer explains how to add a shortcut that corresponds
to something you know how to do manually:
http://tex.stackexchan
How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text? I am using
2.2.0.
Thanks,
Hal
On 03/20/2015 02:16 PM, Jacob Shapiro wrote:
Hello everyone.
I recently asked a question on stack exchange:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes
and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX?
I realize I might need to write my own module
On 03/20/2015 02:16 PM, Jacob Shapiro wrote:
Hello everyone.
I recently asked a question on stack exchange:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes
and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX?
I realize I might need to write my own module
On 03/20/2015 02:16 PM, Jacob Shapiro wrote:
Hello everyone.
I recently asked a question on stack exchange:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes
and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX?
I realize I might need to write my own "m
Hello everyone.
I recently asked a question on stack exchange:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes
and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX?
I realize I might need to write my own module but I have no idea
how to do so and I
Hello everyone.
I recently asked a question on stack exchange:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes
and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX?
I realize I might need to write my own module but I have no idea
how to do so and I
Hello everyone.
I recently asked a question on stack exchange:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes
and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX?
I realize I might need to write my own "module" but I have no idea
how to d
Hi, everyone!
The IEEETran class has a corresponding LyX layout which seems to work well.
This
includes handling theorems.
However, it appears that after a recent LyX update, none of the modules for
numbering theorems by type (e.g., theorem 1, theorem 2, lemma 1, proposition 1,
theorem 3
Hi, everyone!
The IEEETran class has a corresponding LyX layout which seems to work well.
This
includes handling theorems.
However, it appears that after a recent LyX update, none of the modules for
numbering theorems by type (e.g., theorem 1, theorem 2, lemma 1, proposition 1,
theorem 3
Hi, everyone!
The IEEETran class has a corresponding LyX layout which seems to work well.
This
includes handling theorems.
However, it appears that after a recent LyX update, none of the modules for
numbering theorems by type (e.g., theorem 1, theorem 2, lemma 1, proposition 1,
theorem 3
After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a
document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph
with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of Standard. I guess
this has something to do with the environment order as appears
Dima dima.batenkov at gmail.com writes:
After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a
document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph
with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of Standard. I
guess
this has
After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a
document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph
with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of Standard. I guess
this has something to do with the environment order as appears
Dima dima.batenkov at gmail.com writes:
After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a
document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph
with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of Standard. I
guess
this has
After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a
document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph
with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of "Standard". I guess
this has something to do with the environment order
Dima gmail.com> writes:
>
> After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a
> document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph
> with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of "Standard". I
guess
&
Hi all,
So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a paper,
which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof.
Is there a macro-way of doing this instead of copy-pasting? (\newcommand
is probably not good as the theorem is complicated to write in latex
Cool! Thanks! -Qiqi
On 04/28/2012 02:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/28/2012 05:34 PM, Qiqi Yan wrote:
Hi all,
So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a
paper, which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof.
Is there a macro-way of doing this instead
Hi all,
So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a paper,
which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof.
Is there a macro-way of doing this instead of copy-pasting? (\newcommand
is probably not good as the theorem is complicated to write in latex
Cool! Thanks! -Qiqi
On 04/28/2012 02:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/28/2012 05:34 PM, Qiqi Yan wrote:
Hi all,
So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a
paper, which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof.
Is there a macro-way of doing this instead
Hi all,
So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a paper,
which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof.
Is there a macro-way of doing this instead of copy-pasting? (\newcommand
is probably not good as the theorem is complicated to write in latex
Cool! Thanks! -Qiqi
On 04/28/2012 02:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/28/2012 05:34 PM, Qiqi Yan wrote:
Hi all,
So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a
paper, which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof.
Is there a macro-way of doing this instead
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torquil at gmail.com writes:
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torquil at gmail.com writes:
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen gmail.com> writes:
>
> On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > A crude workaround is to put
> > \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
> > in your preamble.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew
the following to my preamble also is breaking instant preview:
\newtheoremstyle{mytheorem} %hnamei
{\topsep}% Space above
{\topsep}% Space below
{\ttfamily} % hBody fonti
{} % hIndent amounti1
{\ttfamily} % hTheorem head fonti
{:} % hPunctuation after theorem headi
{.5em} % hSpace after
the following to my preamble also is breaking instant preview:
\newtheoremstyle{mytheorem} %hnamei
{\topsep}% Space above
{\topsep}% Space below
{\ttfamily} % hBody fonti
{} % hIndent amounti1
{\ttfamily} % hTheorem head fonti
{:} % hPunctuation after theorem headi
{.5em} % hSpace after
he following to my preamble also is breaking instant preview:
\newtheoremstyle{mytheorem} %hnamei
{\topsep}% Space above
{\topsep}% Space below
{\ttfamily} % hBody fonti
{} % hIndent amounti1
{\ttfamily} % hTheorem head fonti
{:} % hPunctuation after theorem headi
{.5em} % hS
Hi all,
In LyX 2.0.2 (on Win7) I am using the module Theorems (Numbered by Type)
for lemmas, propositions, etc. However, the proof functionality results in
an error when compiling the document into a pdf file. It seems, from the
log file, that there is an error, as in the source there is the
Jeroen van Zundert zundertj at gmail.com writes:
The change in that file (removing the backslash) also exists in the file on my
pc (..\Resources\layouts\theorems-proof-std.inc)
You might check the ...\layouts folder under your home directory (on Win 7
that's usually something like
Hi all,
In LyX 2.0.2 (on Win7) I am using the module Theorems (Numbered by Type)
for lemmas, propositions, etc. However, the proof functionality results in
an error when compiling the document into a pdf file. It seems, from the
log file, that there is an error, as in the source there is the
Jeroen van Zundert zundertj at gmail.com writes:
The change in that file (removing the backslash) also exists in the file on my
pc (..\Resources\layouts\theorems-proof-std.inc)
You might check the ...\layouts folder under your home directory (on Win 7
that's usually something like
Hi all,
In LyX 2.0.2 (on Win7) I am using the module "Theorems (Numbered by Type)"
for lemmas, propositions, etc. However, the proof functionality results in
an error when compiling the document into a pdf file. It seems, from the
log file, that there is an error, as in the source there is the
Jeroen van Zundert gmail.com> writes:
>
> The change in that file (removing the backslash) also exists in the file on my
pc ("..\Resources\layouts\theorems-proof-std.inc")
You might check the ...\layouts folder under your home directory (on Win 7
that's usually something like
Hi!
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works
fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
!
Hi!
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works
fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
!
Hi!
I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works
fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
"! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname ->\inputencoding
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the
> Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
> works fine when not using Theorems.
>
> The error I get is:
>
> "! Undefined control sequence.
>
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
"!
those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked.
I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error
you did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions
of some of the .inc files used by the theorem modules. I deleted those,
reconfigured LyX
those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked.
I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error
you did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions
of some of the .inc files used by the theorem modules. I deleted those,
reconfigured LyX
are amsmath.sty and
> amsthm.sty, and without those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked.
>
> I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error
> you did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions
> of some of the .inc files
I've just upgraded my laptop box to Fedora 15, with texlive 2010-fc15.
Since then, when I try to load the Theorem-AMS-Bytype modules (using book
layout and
class), I get the error messages:
Error reading module theorem-ams-bytype
The strange thing is that the usual Theorems (AMS) module works
are amsmath.sty and
amsthm.sty, and without those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked.
I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error you
did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions of some of
the .inc files used by the theorem modules. I deleted
I've just upgraded my laptop box to Fedora 15, with texlive 2010-fc15.
Since then, when I try to load the Theorem-AMS-Bytype modules (using book
layout and
class), I get the error messages:
Error reading module theorem-ams-bytype
The strange thing is that the usual Theorems (AMS) module works
are amsmath.sty and
amsthm.sty, and without those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked.
I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error you
did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions of some of
the .inc files used by the theorem modules. I deleted
I've just upgraded my laptop box to Fedora 15, with texlive 2010-fc15.
Since then, when I try to load the Theorem-AMS-Bytype modules (using book
layout and
class), I get the error messages:
"Error reading module theorem-ams-bytype"
The strange thing is that the usual Theorems (A
uot; uses are amsmath.sty and
amsthm.sty, and without those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked.
I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error you
did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions of some of
the .inc files used by the theorem
On 05/30/2011 02:52 PM, Ernesto Posse wrote:
Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a Proposition
environment and the text is something like this
Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
1. [enu:item1] something
2. [enu:item2] other
and later on I want
On 05/30/2011 02:52 PM, Ernesto Posse wrote:
Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a Proposition
environment and the text is something like this
Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
1. [enu:item1] something
2. [enu:item2] other
and later on I want
On 05/30/2011 02:52 PM, Ernesto Posse wrote:
> Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a "Proposition"
> environment and the text is something like this
>
> Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
> 1. [enu:item1] something
> 2. [enu:item2] other
>
> and later on I
Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a Proposition
environment and the text is something like this
Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
1. [enu:item1] something
2. [enu:item2] other
and later on I want references to show, for example as:
... by Proposition
Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a Proposition
environment and the text is something like this
Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
1. [enu:item1] something
2. [enu:item2] other
and later on I want references to show, for example as:
... by Proposition
Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a "Proposition"
environment and the text is something like this
Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
1. [enu:item1] something
2. [enu:item2] other
and later on I want references to show, for example as:
"... by Proposition
Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago
and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that
is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and
not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted the example as a theorem also.
How can I fix
Hello,
Jinxi Cheng wrote:
Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago
and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that
is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and
not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted the example as a theorem
On 04/21/2011 11:58 AM, Jinxi Cheng wrote:
Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago
and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that
is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and
not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted
Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago
and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that
is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and
not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted the example as a theorem also.
How can I fix
Hello,
Jinxi Cheng wrote:
Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago
and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that
is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and
not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted the example as a theorem
On 04/21/2011 11:58 AM, Jinxi Cheng wrote:
Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago
and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that
is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and
not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted
1 - 100 of 664 matches
Mail list logo
