On Wednesday 27 December 2006 02:15, Stacia Hartleben wrote:
Hi, I addressed this in another mail but no one seemed to answer and I
can't really find any posts about how exactly to use this great new
feature in 1.5.0. I'd like to use it for my Sanskrit assignment if I
can to test it out. I've
Stacia == Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stacia Hi, I addressed this in another mail but no one seemed to
Stacia answer and I can't really find any posts about how exactly to
Stacia use this great new feature in 1.5.0. I'd like to use it for my
Stacia Sanskrit assignment if I can to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Stacia Similar thing for Sanskrit - it whines about putting combine
Stacia into the options, but when I do, it just gives me a bunch of
Stacia undefined control sequence stuff.
The documentation at the page above seems to say that you will need to
load the package
Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have
misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask in all
honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the point of going
through all this trouble to make LyX unicode compatible if it well,
doesn't work with the majority of
Stacia == Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stacia Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have
Stacia misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask
Stacia in all honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the
Stacia point of going through all this
On 12/27/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something that is really missing now is code to be able to replace
missing glyphs with the corresponding LaTeX macro.
Isn't that what the UCS package is for? Can anyone figure that out?
On 12/27/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
It seems that I have
misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask in all
honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the point of going
through all this trouble to make LyX unicode compatible if it well,
doesn't work with the majority of unicode
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
Isn't that what the UCS package is for? Can anyone figure that out?
AFAIK this package is not maintained anymore and superseeded by the utf8 input
encoding integrated in the LaTeX base distribution
(i.e., \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}).
Jürgen
Stacia == Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stacia On 12/27/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something that is really missing now is code to be able to replace
missing glyphs with the corresponding LaTeX macro.
Stacia Isn't that what the UCS package is for? Can
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 02:15, Stacia Hartleben wrote:
Hi, I addressed this in another mail but no one seemed to answer and I
can't really find any posts about how exactly to use this great new
feature in 1.5.0. I'd like to use it for my Sanskrit assignment if I
can to test it out. I've
Stacia == Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stacia Hi, I addressed this in another mail but no one seemed to
Stacia answer and I can't really find any posts about how exactly to
Stacia use this great new feature in 1.5.0. I'd like to use it for my
Stacia Sanskrit assignment if I can to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Stacia Similar thing for Sanskrit - it whines about putting combine
Stacia into the options, but when I do, it just gives me a bunch of
Stacia undefined control sequence stuff.
The documentation at the page above seems to say that you will need to
load the package
Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have
misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask in all
honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the point of going
through all this trouble to make LyX unicode compatible if it well,
doesn't work with the majority of
Stacia == Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stacia Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have
Stacia misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask
Stacia in all honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the
Stacia point of going through all this
On 12/27/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something that is really missing now is code to be able to replace
missing glyphs with the corresponding LaTeX macro.
Isn't that what the UCS package is for? Can anyone figure that out?
On 12/27/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
It seems that I have
misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask in all
honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the point of going
through all this trouble to make LyX unicode compatible if it well,
doesn't work with the majority of unicode
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
Isn't that what the UCS package is for? Can anyone figure that out?
AFAIK this package is not maintained anymore and superseeded by the utf8 input
encoding integrated in the LaTeX base distribution
(i.e., \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}).
Jürgen
Stacia == Stacia Hartleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stacia On 12/27/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something that is really missing now is code to be able to replace
missing glyphs with the corresponding LaTeX macro.
Stacia Isn't that what the UCS package is for? Can
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 02:15, Stacia Hartleben wrote:
> Hi, I addressed this in another mail but no one seemed to answer and I
> can't really find any posts about how exactly to use this great new
> feature in 1.5.0. I'd like to use it for my Sanskrit assignment if I
> can to test it out.
> "Stacia" == Stacia Hartleben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stacia> Hi, I addressed this in another mail but no one seemed to
Stacia> answer and I can't really find any posts about how exactly to
Stacia> use this great new feature in 1.5.0. I'd like to use it for my
Stacia> Sanskrit assignment
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Stacia> Similar thing for Sanskrit - it whines about putting combine
> Stacia> into the options, but when I do, it just gives me a bunch of
> Stacia> "undefined control sequence" stuff.
>
> The documentation at the page above seems to say that you will need to
> load
Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have
misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask in all
honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the point of going
through all this trouble to make LyX unicode compatible if it well,
doesn't work with the majority of
> "Stacia" == Stacia Hartleben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stacia> Hi everyone thanks for your replies. It seems that I have
Stacia> misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask
Stacia> in all honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the
Stacia> point of going through
On 12/27/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Something that is really missing now is code to be able to replace
missing glyphs with the corresponding LaTeX macro.
Isn't that what the UCS package is for? Can anyone figure that out?
On 12/27/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
> It seems that I have
> misunderstood the unicode direction for LyX 1.5.0 - can I ask in all
> honesty and with no disrespect meant - what is the point of going
> through all this trouble to make LyX unicode compatible if it well,
> doesn't work with the majority of
Stacia Hartleben wrote:
> Isn't that what the UCS package is for? Can anyone figure that out?
AFAIK this package is not maintained anymore and superseeded by the utf8 input
encoding integrated in the LaTeX base distribution
(i.e., \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}).
Jürgen
> "Stacia" == Stacia Hartleben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stacia> On 12/27/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Something that is really missing now is code to be able to replace
>> missing glyphs with the corresponding LaTeX macro.
Stacia> Isn't that what the UCS package
Hi, I addressed this in another mail but no one seemed to answer and I
can't really find any posts about how exactly to use this great new
feature in 1.5.0. I'd like to use it for my Sanskrit assignment if I
can to test it out. I've tried it with both Sanskrit text and
Japanese, and both of them
Hi, I addressed this in another mail but no one seemed to answer and I
can't really find any posts about how exactly to use this great new
feature in 1.5.0. I'd like to use it for my Sanskrit assignment if I
can to test it out. I've tried it with both Sanskrit text and
Japanese, and both of them
Hi, I addressed this in another mail but no one seemed to answer and I
can't really find any posts about how exactly to use this great new
feature in 1.5.0. I'd like to use it for my Sanskrit assignment if I
can to test it out. I've tried it with both Sanskrit text and
Japanese, and both of them
30 matches
Mail list logo
