Inserting the following in math mode
[A|-B]
the minus appears as an binary operator rather than a unary operator on B,
so the minus is too big and the space to B is too large.
Using tex code:
[A|{-B}] looks better, although I thing the minus is still too large.
What is the best lyx approach?
Am 03.09.2010 15:13, schrieb Neal Becker:
Inserting the following in math mode
[A|-B]
the minus appears as an binary operator rather than a unary operator on B,
so the minus is too big and the space to B is too large.
see this older mail from me:
On 9/3/2010 9:13 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Inserting the following in math mode
[A|-B]
the minus appears as an binary operator rather than a unary operator on B,
so the minus is too big and the space to B is too large.
Using tex code:
[A|{-B}] looks better, although I thing the minus is still too
Inserting the following in math mode
[A|-B]
the minus appears as an binary operator rather than a unary operator on B,
so the minus is too big and the space to B is too large.
Using tex code:
[A|{-B}] looks better, although I thing the minus is still too large.
What is the best lyx approach?
Am 03.09.2010 15:13, schrieb Neal Becker:
Inserting the following in math mode
[A|-B]
the minus appears as an binary operator rather than a unary operator on B,
so the minus is too big and the space to B is too large.
see this older mail from me:
On 9/3/2010 9:13 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Inserting the following in math mode
[A|-B]
the minus appears as an binary operator rather than a unary operator on B,
so the minus is too big and the space to B is too large.
Using tex code:
[A|{-B}] looks better, although I thing the minus is still too
Inserting the following in math mode
[A|-B]
the minus appears as an binary operator rather than a unary operator on B,
so the minus is too big and the space to B is too large.
Using tex code:
[A|{-B}] looks better, although I thing the minus is still too large.
What is the best lyx approach?
Am 03.09.2010 15:13, schrieb Neal Becker:
Inserting the following in math mode
[A|-B]
the minus appears as an binary operator rather than a unary operator on B,
so the minus is too big and the space to B is too large.
see this older mail from me:
On 9/3/2010 9:13 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Inserting the following in math mode
[A|-B]
the minus appears as an binary operator rather than a unary operator on B,
so the minus is too big and the space to B is too large.
Using tex code:
[A|{-B}] looks better, although I thing the minus is still too
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:52:37PM +0200, Lyx User wrote:
Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
No.
Or does it actually exists in latex?
It does not. TeX does or does not add a bit of space in certain places
to differentiate between unary and binary minus. This works
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:52:37PM +0200, Lyx User wrote:
Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
No.
Or does it actually exists in latex?
It does not. TeX does or does not add a bit of space in certain places
to differentiate between unary and binary minus. This works
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:52:37PM +0200, Lyx User wrote:
> Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
No.
> Or does it actually exists in latex?
It does not. TeX does or does not add a bit of space in certain places
to differentiate between unary and binary minus. This
Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
Or does it actually exists in latex? I did a search, but could
not find anything better than just using '-'.
I think intervals such as $[-\infty, \infty)$ don't look
very nice. I could use some negative space, though I was wondering
Lyx User wrote:
Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
No.
Or does it actually exists in latex? I did a search, but could
not find anything better than just using '-'.
I think intervals such as $[-\infty, \infty)$ don't look
very nice. I could use some negative space, though I
Lyx User wrote:
Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
Or does it actually exists in latex? I did a search, but could
not find anything better than just using '-'.
I think intervals such as $[-\infty, \infty)$ don't look
very nice. I could use some negative space, though I
Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
Or does it actually exists in latex? I did a search, but could
not find anything better than just using '-'.
I think intervals such as $[-\infty, \infty)$ don't look
very nice. I could use some negative space, though I was wondering
Lyx User wrote:
Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
No.
Or does it actually exists in latex? I did a search, but could
not find anything better than just using '-'.
I think intervals such as $[-\infty, \infty)$ don't look
very nice. I could use some negative space, though I
Lyx User wrote:
Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
Or does it actually exists in latex? I did a search, but could
not find anything better than just using '-'.
I think intervals such as $[-\infty, \infty)$ don't look
very nice. I could use some negative space, though I
Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
Or does it actually exists in latex? I did a search, but could
not find anything better than just using '-'.
I think intervals such as $[-\infty, \infty)$ don't look
very nice. I could use some negative space, though I was wondering
Lyx User wrote:
Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
No.
Or does it actually exists in latex? I did a search, but could
not find anything better than just using '-'.
I think intervals such as $[-\infty, \infty)$ don't look
very nice. I could use some negative space, though I
Lyx User wrote:
Is there a special unary minus in the math panel somewhere?
Or does it actually exists in latex? I did a search, but could
not find anything better than just using '-'.
I think intervals such as $[-\infty, \infty)$ don't look
very nice. I could use some negative space, though I
21 matches
Mail list logo
