Re: xetex and theorem

2012-02-27 Thread d c
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torquil at gmail.com writes:
 
 On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

  A crude workaround is to put
  \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
  in your preamble.
 
 Thank you very much!
 

I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew



Re: xetex and theorem

2012-02-27 Thread d c
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torquil at gmail.com writes:
 
 On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

  A crude workaround is to put
  \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
  in your preamble.
 
 Thank you very much!
 

I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew



Re: xetex and theorem

2012-02-27 Thread d c
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen  gmail.com> writes:
> 
> On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

> > A crude workaround is to put
> > \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
> > in your preamble.
> 
> Thank you very much!
> 

I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew



xetex and theorem

2012-01-11 Thread Torquil Macdonald Sørensen

Hi!

I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the 
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works 
fine when not using Theorems.


The error I get is:

! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
 {latin9}Definition
l.43 T
  his is a definition.\end{defn}
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.


Sorry about the briefness, I'm just starting to type using a Dvorak keyboard, so 
I'm extremely slow at the moment...


Best regards and thanks,
Torquil Sørensen


example.lyx
Description: application/lyx


Re: xetex and theorem

2012-01-11 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
 I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the 
 Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
 works fine when not using Theorems.
 
 The error I get is:
 
 ! Undefined control sequence.
 \definitionname -\inputencoding
   {latin9}Definition

Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800

A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.

HTH
Jürgen


Re: xetex and theorem

2012-01-11 Thread Torquil Macdonald Sørensen

On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:

I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.

The error I get is:

! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
   {latin9}Definition


Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800

A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.


Thank you very much!

Torquil


xetex and theorem

2012-01-11 Thread Torquil Macdonald Sørensen

Hi!

I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the 
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works 
fine when not using Theorems.


The error I get is:

! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
 {latin9}Definition
l.43 T
  his is a definition.\end{defn}
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.


Sorry about the briefness, I'm just starting to type using a Dvorak keyboard, so 
I'm extremely slow at the moment...


Best regards and thanks,
Torquil Sørensen


example.lyx
Description: application/lyx


Re: xetex and theorem

2012-01-11 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
 I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the 
 Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
 works fine when not using Theorems.
 
 The error I get is:
 
 ! Undefined control sequence.
 \definitionname -\inputencoding
   {latin9}Definition

Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800

A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.

HTH
Jürgen


Re: xetex and theorem

2012-01-11 Thread Torquil Macdonald Sørensen

On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:

I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.

The error I get is:

! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
   {latin9}Definition


Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800

A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.


Thank you very much!

Torquil


xetex and theorem

2012-01-11 Thread Torquil Macdonald Sørensen

Hi!

I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the 
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works 
fine when not using Theorems.


The error I get is:

"! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname ->\inputencoding
 {latin9}Definition
l.43 T
  his is a definition.\end{defn}
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined."


Sorry about the briefness, I'm just starting to type using a Dvorak keyboard, so 
I'm extremely slow at the moment...


Best regards and thanks,
Torquil Sørensen


example.lyx
Description: application/lyx


Re: xetex and theorem

2012-01-11 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the 
> Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
> works fine when not using Theorems.
> 
> The error I get is:
> 
> "! Undefined control sequence.
> \definitionname ->\inputencoding
>   {latin9}Definition

Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800

A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.

HTH
Jürgen


Re: xetex and theorem

2012-01-11 Thread Torquil Macdonald Sørensen

On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:

I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.

The error I get is:

"! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname ->\inputencoding
   {latin9}Definition


Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800

A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.


Thank you very much!

Torquil