Re: relative heading levels in included docs?

1999-03-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

> "Mikko" == Mikko Harjula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Mikko> I have a need to include common parts in two documents.  Those
Mikko> parts have headings and unfortunately the documentation
Mikko> standard I have to follow has different heading levels for the
Mikko> common parts.  F.ex:

Currently you will indeed not have a lot of solutions, except for the
script. I hope this will be possible in the future, but that's not
what I'd call a common thing to do.

JMarc

-- 
+++ the lyx project user mailing list +++
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the **Subject** unsubscribe.



relative heading levels in included docs?

1999-03-04 Thread Mikko Harjula

I have a need to include common parts in two documents.  Those parts
have headings and unfortunately the documentation standard I have to
follow has different heading levels for the common parts.  F.ex:

Doc1


Section 1
  Subsection A (Included)
Subsubsection X (Included)
Section 2

Doc2


Section 1
  Subsection 1
Subsubsection A (included)
  Paragraph X (included)
  Subsection 2

So the included parts should come from the same file.  The best
solution I have thought of so far is to use separate include files and
generate the other one with a script.  The script should also set the
generated version read only.

A relative heading would be nice so instead of 'Subsection' I could
say 'Heading +1'.  Also this could be done with a macros or maybe a
lyx programming language ... :-)

-- 
+++ the lyx project user mailing list +++
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the **Subject** unsubscribe.