Le 01/02/2020 à 21:47, Jean-Marie Pacquet a écrit :
> Le 01/02/2020 à 20:04, Rich Shepard a écrit :
>> On Sat, 1 Feb 2020, Rich Shepard wrote:
>>
>>> I just updated the scrguien PDF to the 2019-10-10 version and will read
>>> Section 4.21. I may be back with specific questions for you.
>>
>> Jean-M
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 05:54:21PM +, F M Salter wrote:
> I am enclosing a minimal example
I still can not reproduce. Do I need to put cursor to specific
place in the document first?
Pavel
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
In updating my debian I got the new lyx 2.3.4-1 installed. -- Good.
Converting my beamer presentation in a pdf shows the frames not in
landscape any more and I do not know where to change it to its usual
view. -- Bad
Could somebody tell me?
Wolfgang
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.ly
Am Sonntag, den 02.02.2020, 13:48 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> Converting my beamer presentation in a pdf shows the frames not in
> landscape any more and I do not know where to change it to its usual
> view.
Maybe you have a similar problem as this
https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/11724
Am 02.02.20 um 15:16 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Sonntag, den 02.02.2020, 13:48 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Converting my beamer presentation in a pdf shows the frames not in
landscape any more and I do not know where to change it to its usual
view.
Maybe you have a similar problem
Am Sonntag, den 02.02.2020, 17:37 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> I am afraid > not
> I include a Minimum Example
> Could somebody try it out with the 2.3.4 format?
I do not see a problem with this file.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-users
Am Sonntag, den 02.02.2020, 17:47 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> I do not see a problem with this file.
But maybe because I tried with a version that already has the fix for
bug 11724. I'll try again with 2.3.4.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Am Sonntag, den 02.02.2020, 17:54 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> But maybe because I tried with a version that already has the fix for
> bug 11724. I'll try again with 2.3.4.
As I suspected, it is a variant of bug 11724, and modifying the
referred workaround slightly fixes the document:
* Go
Am 02.02.20 um 18:11 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Sonntag, den 02.02.2020, 17:54 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
But maybe because I tried with a version that already has the fix for
bug 11724. I'll try again with 2.3.4.
As I suspected, it is a variant of bug 11724, and modifying the
ref
