Am 04.06.2011 um 03:38 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
It would appear that on Jun 4, Charlie did say:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote:
This is worse than those
distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting
under
Am 04.06.2011 um 03:38 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
It would appear that on Jun 4, Charlie did say:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote:
This is worse than those
distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting
under
Am 04.06.2011 um 03:38 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
>
> It would appear that on Jun 4, Charlie did say:
>
>> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
>> "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" wrote:
>>
>>> This is worse than those
>>> distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist
2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the issue
that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word and
it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll admit that as much as I
totally loath all sidebars «I like my entire window width to always
It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say:
2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the
issue
that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word
and
it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll admit
On 5-6-2011 16:23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say:
2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the
issue
that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word
and
2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the issue
that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word and
it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll admit that as much as I
totally loath all sidebars «I like my entire window width to always
It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say:
2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the
issue
that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word
and
it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll admit
On 5-6-2011 16:23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say:
2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the
issue
that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word
and
>
>
> 2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the issue
> that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word and
> it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll admit that as much as I
> totally loath all sidebars «I like my entire window width to
It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say:
> 2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the
> issue
> that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word
> and
> it's immediate context when it opened. And I'll
On 5-6-2011 16:23, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
>
> It would appear that on Jun 5, Vincent van Ravesteijn did say:
>
>> 2) pop up vs sidebar: I think this was probably the solution to the
>> issue
>> that the old pop up wasn't smart enough not to hide the hi-lighted word
>>
Hello, I'm mostly interested in just using LyX to write stuff... I learn a
few things about how to do something fancy and keep a copy of something it
worked in so that I'll have a chance of duplicating it again someday.
If it matters: I'm a ‘multi-boot’, ‘multi-Linux
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote:
This is worse than those
distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting
under unrecognized words. I don't like those because they distract me
from the natural flow of my writing.
I may be
It would appear that on Jun 4, Charlie did say:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote:
This is worse than those
distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting
under unrecognized words. I don't like those because they
Hello, I'm mostly interested in just using LyX to write stuff... I learn a
few things about how to do something fancy and keep a copy of something it
worked in so that I'll have a chance of duplicating it again someday.
If it matters: I'm a ‘multi-boot’, ‘multi-Linux
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote:
This is worse than those
distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting
under unrecognized words. I don't like those because they distract me
from the natural flow of my writing.
I may be
It would appear that on Jun 4, Charlie did say:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote:
This is worse than those
distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting
under unrecognized words. I don't like those because they
Hello, I'm mostly interested in just using LyX to write stuff... I learn a
few things about how to do something fancy and keep a copy of something it
worked in so that I'll have a chance of duplicating it again someday.
If it matters: I'm a ‘multi-boot’, ‘multi-Linux
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
"Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" wrote:
> This is worse than those
> distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting
> under unrecognized words. I don't like those because they distract me
> from the natural flow of my writing.
I
It would appear that on Jun 4, Charlie did say:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:56:53 -0400
> "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" wrote:
>
> > This is worse than those
> > distracting squiggly underlines that some programs insist on putting
> > under unrecognized words. I don't like those
21 matches
Mail list logo