Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-10 Thread Ross Reyes
Heck rgh...@lyx.org; lyx-users Users lyx-users@lists.lyx.org; lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments inline Let's see if I understand: -1. You define a *file type* in LyX under Preferences File Handling

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-10 Thread Ross Reyes
Heck rgh...@lyx.org; lyx-users Users lyx-users@lists.lyx.org; lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments inline Let's see if I understand: -1. You define a *file type* in LyX under Preferences File Handling

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-10 Thread Ross Reyes
Vergara Gil" <a...@cphr.edu.cu> Cc: "Richard Heck" <rgh...@lyx.org>; "lyx-users Users" <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>; <lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-02 Thread Alex Vergara Gil
From: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which converts plantuml source fields into uml graphs, i.e. it defines the call to compile

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-02 Thread Rainer M Krug
Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: From: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which converts plantuml source fields into uml

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-02 Thread Alex Vergara Gil
To: Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu Cc: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org; lyx-users Users lyx-users@lists.lyx.org; lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments inline Let's see if I understand: -1. You define a *file

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-02 Thread Alex Vergara Gil
From: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which converts plantuml source fields into uml graphs, i.e. it defines the call to compile

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-02 Thread Rainer M Krug
Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: From: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which converts plantuml source fields into uml

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-02 Thread Alex Vergara Gil
To: Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu Cc: Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org; lyx-users Users lyx-users@lists.lyx.org; lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python binding I just add comments inline Let's see if I understand: -1. You define a *file

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-02 Thread Alex Vergara Gil
From: "Richard Heck" Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM >> I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via >> defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which >> "converts" plantuml source fields into uml graphs, i.e. it defines the >>

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-02 Thread Rainer M Krug
"Alex Vergara Gil" writes: > From: "Richard Heck" > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:05 PM >>> I might be *completely* off, but couldn't you achieve exactly this via >>> defining converters? I have for example a converter defined, which >>> "converts" plantuml

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-06-02 Thread Alex Vergara Gil
i...@krugs.de> To: "Alex Vergara Gil" <a...@cphr.edu.cu> Cc: "Richard Heck" <rgh...@lyx.org>; "lyx-users Users" <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>; <lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Feature Request] python bind

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package.

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Alex Vergara Gil
From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Rainer M Krug
Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/29/2014 04:57 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: Richard you obviously miss the point here, or I was not very clear! it is not a different format, is a facility to have python scripts running within LyX framework, you have to see ipython notebook to

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/29/2014 05:34 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: *From:* Richard Heck mailto:rgh...@lyx.org *Sent:* Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package.

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Alex Vergara Gil
From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Rainer M Krug
Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/29/2014 04:57 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu writes: Richard you obviously miss the point here, or I was not very clear! it is not a different format, is a facility to have python scripts running within LyX framework, you have to see ipython notebook to

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/29/2014 05:34 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: *From:* Richard Heck mailto:rgh...@lyx.org *Sent:* Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil a...@cphr.edu.cu wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one produced by matplotlib package.

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Alex Vergara Gil
From: Richard Heck Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? This feature

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Rainer M Krug
"Alex Vergara Gil" writes: > From: Richard Heck > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM > > > On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > > Hello Lyxers > > I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of > python code within its own

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/29/2014 04:57 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: "Alex Vergara Gil" writes: Richard you obviously miss the point here, or I was not very clear! it is not a different format, is a facility to have python scripts running within LyX framework, you have to see ipython notebook to

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/29/2014 05:34 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: *From:* Richard Heck *Sent:* Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:26 PM On 05/29/2014 03:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello Lyxers I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code

Re: [Feature Request] python binding

2014-05-29 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > Hello Lyxers > > I wonder why LyX is not available to process little pieces of python code > within its own framework, like ipython notebook for instance?? > This feature allows us to have beautiful graphics such the one