Re: \cite, \ref

On 2010-09-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: The generic version of this would be an LFUN that re-lyxes the selection. As in math and relyx of files, any unknown construct will be converted to an ERT box. yes elegant solutions which looks even less invasive from the coding view. no

Re: \cite, \ref

On 2010-09-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: The generic version of this would be an LFUN that re-lyxes the selection. As in math and relyx of files, any unknown construct will be converted to an ERT box. yes elegant solutions which looks even less invasive from the coding view. no

Re: \cite, \ref

On 2010-09-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> The generic version of this would be an LFUN that re-lyxes the selection. >> As in math and relyx of files, any unknown construct will be converted to >> an ERT box. > yes elegant solutions which looks even less invasive from the coding

Re: \cite, \ref

Julien Rioux wrote: On 06/09/2010 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: Still, for a wish list, it would be nice to have a special tex mode, sort of like math mode, so that simple things like \noindent, \cite, etc. could be automatically entered into LyX. That's on my wishlist too. For users

Re: \cite, \ref

On 2010-09-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: Julien Rioux wrote: On 06/09/2010 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: Still, for a wish list, it would be nice to have a special tex mode, sort of like math mode, so that simple things like \noindent, \cite, etc. could be automatically entered into LyX. That's

Re: \cite, \ref

Guenter Milde wrote: The generic version of this would be an LFUN that re-lyxes the selection. As in math and relyx of files, any unknown construct will be converted to an ERT box. yes elegant solutions which looks even less invasive from the coding view. no new ert inset, just new lfun which

Re: \cite, \ref

Julien Rioux wrote: On 06/09/2010 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: Still, for a wish list, it would be nice to have a special tex mode, sort of like math mode, so that simple things like \noindent, \cite, etc. could be automatically entered into LyX. That's on my wishlist too. For users

Re: \cite, \ref

On 2010-09-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: Julien Rioux wrote: On 06/09/2010 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: Still, for a wish list, it would be nice to have a special tex mode, sort of like math mode, so that simple things like \noindent, \cite, etc. could be automatically entered into LyX. That's

Re: \cite, \ref

Guenter Milde wrote: The generic version of this would be an LFUN that re-lyxes the selection. As in math and relyx of files, any unknown construct will be converted to an ERT box. yes elegant solutions which looks even less invasive from the coding view. no new ert inset, just new lfun which

Re: \cite, \ref

Julien Rioux wrote: > On 06/09/2010 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: >> Still, for a wish list, it would be nice to have a special tex mode, sort >> of like math mode, so that simple things like \noindent, \cite, etc. could >> be automatically entered into LyX. > > That's on my wishlist too. For

Re: \cite, \ref

On 2010-09-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Julien Rioux wrote: >> On 06/09/2010 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: >>> Still, for a wish list, it would be nice to have a special tex mode, sort >>> of like math mode, so that simple things like \noindent, \cite, etc. could >>> be automatically entered into

Re: \cite, \ref

Guenter Milde wrote: > The generic version of this would be an LFUN that re-lyxes the selection. > As in math and relyx of files, any unknown construct will be converted to > an ERT box. yes elegant solutions which looks even less invasive from the coding view. no new ert inset, just new lfun

Re: \cite, \ref

On 09/04/2010 08:13 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: Pavel - It does not work for me. Do you know the name of the function to which alt-o is mapped? This would be one of the really stupid things about OSX: No shortcuts. Drives me insane when I use Macs. rh On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Pavel

Re: \cite, \ref

Richard Heck wrote: This would be one of the really stupid things about OSX: No shortcuts. my goodness how is one supposed to work with keyboard? p

Re: \cite, \ref

The other dialogs in LyX work properly on Macs. It is just this one. The OK button should be highlighted so that hitting return accepts, but it is not. Moreover, even if you navigate to it so that it is highlighted, hitting return does not accept. I guess this is a bug. Do you all agree?

Re: \cite, \ref

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead kierst...@asu.edu wrote: The other dialogs in LyX work properly on Macs.  It is just this one.  The OK button should be highlighted so that hitting return accepts, but it is not.   Moreover, even if you navigate to it so that it is highlighted,

Re: \cite, \ref

On 06/09/2010 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: Still, for a wish list, it would be nice to have a special tex mode, sort of like math mode, so that simple things like \noindent, \cite, etc. could be automatically entered into LyX. That's on my wishlist too. For users coming from the TeX world

Re: \cite, \ref

On 09/04/2010 08:13 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: Pavel - It does not work for me. Do you know the name of the function to which alt-o is mapped? This would be one of the really stupid things about OSX: No shortcuts. Drives me insane when I use Macs. rh On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Pavel

Re: \cite, \ref

Richard Heck wrote: This would be one of the really stupid things about OSX: No shortcuts. my goodness how is one supposed to work with keyboard? p

Re: \cite, \ref

The other dialogs in LyX work properly on Macs. It is just this one. The OK button should be highlighted so that hitting return accepts, but it is not. Moreover, even if you navigate to it so that it is highlighted, hitting return does not accept. I guess this is a bug. Do you all agree?

Re: \cite, \ref

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead kierst...@asu.edu wrote: The other dialogs in LyX work properly on Macs.  It is just this one.  The OK button should be highlighted so that hitting return accepts, but it is not.   Moreover, even if you navigate to it so that it is highlighted,

Re: \cite, \ref

On 06/09/2010 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: Still, for a wish list, it would be nice to have a special tex mode, sort of like math mode, so that simple things like \noindent, \cite, etc. could be automatically entered into LyX. That's on my wishlist too. For users coming from the TeX world

Re: \cite, \ref

On 09/04/2010 08:13 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: Pavel - It does not work for me. Do you know the name of the function to which alt-o is mapped? This would be one of the really stupid things about OSX: No shortcuts. Drives me insane when I use Macs. rh On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Pavel

Re: \cite, \ref

Richard Heck wrote: > This would be one of the really stupid things about OSX: No shortcuts. my goodness how is one supposed to work with keyboard? p

Re: \cite, \ref

The other dialogs in LyX work properly on Macs. It is just this one. The OK button should be highlighted so that hitting return accepts, but it is not. Moreover, even if you navigate to it so that it is highlighted, hitting return does not accept. I guess this is a bug. Do you all agree?

Re: \cite, \ref

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: > The other dialogs in LyX work properly on Macs.  It is just this one.  The OK > button should be highlighted so that hitting return accepts, but it is not.   > Moreover, even if you navigate to it so that it is

Re: \cite, \ref

On 06/09/2010 1:38 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: Still, for a wish list, it would be nice to have a special tex mode, sort of like math mode, so that simple things like \noindent, \cite, etc. could be automatically entered into LyX. That's on my wishlist too. For users coming from the TeX world

Re: \cite, \ref

Hal Kierstead kierstead at asu.edu writes: Most of the time I already know what I want. It would be really nice if I could just type the tex command \cite{E} or \ref{d} or \eqref{w}, or something similar. Is there is already a way to do something similar? Embedding tex does not seem a

Re: \cite, \ref

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Hal Kierstead kierst...@asu.edu wrote: All - I find the pop-up windows for Insert-Citation and Insert-Cross-Reference quite annoying.  It is nice to have a list of choices, and to be able to use the mouse to choose among them, but this should not be required.

Re: \cite, \ref

BH - This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation opens the citation dialog. Is there a way to jump directly to the OK button after choosing a cross-reference from the list in the dialog instead of pushing tab 6 times? Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 4:10 PM, BH wrote:

Re: \cite, \ref

Thanks, but see my response to Paul's suggestion. Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: Hal Kierstead kierstead at asu.edu writes: Most of the time I already know what I want. It would be really nice if I could just type the tex command \cite{E} or \ref{d} or \eqref{w}, or

Re: \cite, \ref

Hal Kierstead wrote: BH - This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation opens the citation dialog. Is there a way to jump directly to the OK button after choosing a cross-reference from the list in the dialog instead of pushing tab 6 times? alt+o, at least

Re: \cite, \ref

Pavel - It does not work for me. Do you know the name of the function to which alt-o is mapped? Thanks, Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Hal Kierstead wrote: BH - This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation opens the citation dialog.

Re: \cite, \ref

Hal Kierstead wrote: It does not work for me. Do you know the name of the function to which alt-o is mapped? this is no business of lyx, but Qt internal thing. most of menus and buttons in any application has something called accelerator, reachable via alt+key. i bet this works on mac too,

Re: \cite, \ref

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Hal Kierstead kierst...@asu.edu wrote: This certainly is progress---thanks.  Also dialog-show-new-inset citation opens the citation dialog.  Is there a way to jump directly to the OK button after choosing a cross-reference from the list in the dialog instead of

Re: \cite, \ref

Return selects the highlighted button, but in this dialog no button is highlighted. Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 6:28 PM, BH wrote: On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Hal Kierstead kierst...@asu.edu wrote: This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation opens the citation

Re: \cite, \ref

Hal Kierstead kierstead at asu.edu writes: Most of the time I already know what I want. It would be really nice if I could just type the tex command \cite{E} or \ref{d} or \eqref{w}, or something similar. Is there is already a way to do something similar? Embedding tex does not seem a

Re: \cite, \ref

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Hal Kierstead kierst...@asu.edu wrote: All - I find the pop-up windows for Insert-Citation and Insert-Cross-Reference quite annoying.  It is nice to have a list of choices, and to be able to use the mouse to choose among them, but this should not be required.

Re: \cite, \ref

BH - This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation opens the citation dialog. Is there a way to jump directly to the OK button after choosing a cross-reference from the list in the dialog instead of pushing tab 6 times? Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 4:10 PM, BH wrote:

Re: \cite, \ref

Thanks, but see my response to Paul's suggestion. Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: Hal Kierstead kierstead at asu.edu writes: Most of the time I already know what I want. It would be really nice if I could just type the tex command \cite{E} or \ref{d} or \eqref{w}, or

Re: \cite, \ref

Hal Kierstead wrote: BH - This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation opens the citation dialog. Is there a way to jump directly to the OK button after choosing a cross-reference from the list in the dialog instead of pushing tab 6 times? alt+o, at least

Re: \cite, \ref

Pavel - It does not work for me. Do you know the name of the function to which alt-o is mapped? Thanks, Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Hal Kierstead wrote: BH - This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation opens the citation dialog.

Re: \cite, \ref

Hal Kierstead wrote: It does not work for me. Do you know the name of the function to which alt-o is mapped? this is no business of lyx, but Qt internal thing. most of menus and buttons in any application has something called accelerator, reachable via alt+key. i bet this works on mac too,

Re: \cite, \ref

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Hal Kierstead kierst...@asu.edu wrote: This certainly is progress---thanks.  Also dialog-show-new-inset citation opens the citation dialog.  Is there a way to jump directly to the OK button after choosing a cross-reference from the list in the dialog instead of

Re: \cite, \ref

Return selects the highlighted button, but in this dialog no button is highlighted. Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 6:28 PM, BH wrote: On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Hal Kierstead kierst...@asu.edu wrote: This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation opens the citation

Re: \cite, \ref

Hal Kierstead asu.edu> writes: > Most of the time I already know what I want. It would be really nice if I could just type the tex command > \cite{E} or \ref{d} or \eqref{w}, or something similar. > > Is there is already a way to do something similar? Embedding tex does not seem a good

Re: \cite, \ref

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: > All - > > I find the pop-up windows for Insert-Citation and Insert-Cross-Reference > quite annoying.  It is nice to have a list of choices, and to be able to use > the mouse to choose among them, but this should not be

Re: \cite, \ref

BH - This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation opens the citation dialog. Is there a way to jump directly to the OK button after choosing a cross-reference from the list in the dialog instead of pushing tab 6 times? Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 4:10 PM, BH wrote:

Re: \cite, \ref

Thanks, but see my response to Paul's suggestion. Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: > Hal Kierstead asu.edu> writes: > > >> Most of the time I already know what I want. It would be really nice if I > could just type the tex command >> \cite{E} or \ref{d} or \eqref{w}, or

Re: \cite, \ref

Hal Kierstead wrote: > BH - > > This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation > opens the citation dialog. Is there a way to jump directly to the OK button > after choosing a cross-reference from the list in the dialog instead of > pushing tab 6 times? alt+o, at

Re: \cite, \ref

Pavel - It does not work for me. Do you know the name of the function to which alt-o is mapped? Thanks, Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Hal Kierstead wrote: >> BH - >> >> This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation >> opens the citation

Re: \cite, \ref

Hal Kierstead wrote: > It does not work for me. Do you know the name of the function to which alt-o > is mapped? this is no business of lyx, but Qt internal thing. most of menus and buttons in any application has something called accelerator, reachable via alt+key. i bet this works on mac

Re: \cite, \ref

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: > This certainly is progress---thanks.  Also dialog-show-new-inset citation > opens the citation dialog.  Is there a way to jump directly to the OK button > after choosing a cross-reference from the list in the dialog

Re: \cite, \ref

Return selects the highlighted button, but in this dialog no button is highlighted. Hal On Sep 4, 2010, at 6:28 PM, BH wrote: > On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: >> This certainly is progress---thanks. Also dialog-show-new-inset citation >> opens the

Re: cite-ref problem - no whitespace between authorname and et al.

Martin == Martin A Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin hi when i insert a citation reference (using natbib with Martin author-year selected) with more than two authors, then the Martin first author name is displayed in lyx (1.3.4) inside a grey Martin box along with et al., and the year. but

Re: cite-ref problem - no whitespace between authorname and et al.

Martin == Martin A Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin hi when i insert a citation reference (using natbib with Martin author-year selected) with more than two authors, then the Martin first author name is displayed in lyx (1.3.4) inside a grey Martin box along with et al., and the year. but

Re: cite-ref problem -> no whitespace between authorname and et al.

> "Martin" == Martin A Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> hi when i insert a citation reference (using natbib with Martin> author-year selected) with more than two authors, then the Martin> first author name is displayed in lyx (1.3.4) inside a grey Martin> box along with et al., and