Eran Kaplinsky wrote:
I still can't make XeTex work in 2.0 beta 2 with a fully updated MiKTeX
2.9.
I don't know how recent MikTeX 2.9 ist, but from a quick glance at our log, it
looks like at least the l3* packages (LaTeX3 = package expl3) are not up to
date.
(C:\Program Files\MiKTeX
Just a comment to those still using Miktex as their Latex after-Lyx engine:
After many years of using Miktex, I have recently switched to TexLive
(which I use on both Linux-Ubuntu and Windows-XP), mostly because of its
superior updating facilities.
Now I update/upgrade Latex with a single click
You are right. It's a MikteX issue.
Jürgen
Eran Kaplinsky wrote:
I still can't make XeTex work in 2.0 beta 2 with a fully updated MiKTeX
2.9.
I don't know how recent MikTeX 2.9 ist, but from a quick glance at our log, it
looks like at least the l3* packages (LaTeX3 = package expl3) are not up to
date.
(C:\Program Files\MiKTeX
Just a comment to those still using Miktex as their Latex after-Lyx engine:
After many years of using Miktex, I have recently switched to TexLive
(which I use on both Linux-Ubuntu and Windows-XP), mostly because of its
superior updating facilities.
Now I update/upgrade Latex with a single click
You are right. It's a MikteX issue.
Jürgen
Eran Kaplinsky wrote:
> I still can't make XeTex work in 2.0 beta 2 with a fully updated MiKTeX
> 2.9.
I don't know how recent MikTeX 2.9 ist, but from a quick glance at our log, it
looks like at least the l3* packages (LaTeX3 = package "expl3") are not up to
date.
> ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX
Just a comment to those still using Miktex as their Latex after-Lyx engine:
After many years of using Miktex, I have recently switched to TexLive
(which I use on both Linux-Ubuntu and Windows-XP), mostly because of its
superior updating facilities.
Now I update/upgrade Latex with a single click
You are right. It's a MikteX issue.
> Jürgen
>
>
