### Re: Consecutive theorems

```Luca Brandolini wrote:

I am trying to write two consecutive theorems in my paper. However Lyx
always joints the two theorems into a single enviromes.
The only way seems to insert a non-empty line in between.
Is there a solution for this?

Yes, increase the nesting depth of the consecutive theorems

Regards

```

### Re: Consecutive theorems

```On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Luca
Brandoliniluca.brandol...@unibg.it wrote:
I am trying to write two consecutive theorems in my paper. However Lyx
always joints the two theorems into a single enviromes.
The only way seems to insert a non-empty line in between.
Is there a solution for this?

Yes. Put a non-empty line inbetween. Its what I do :)

I put a line inbetween and either put a empty ERT in, or put an empty
note (Alt I-N-N) in to produce a non-empty line

Another trick I use is to insert a Branch. I have a branch called
All which I always leave enabled. Then, if I want to e.g. have a
enumerate environment within a proof, I insert a Branch All and put
the enumerate within the Branch. That said, for this purpose,
increasing the environment depth as suggested by Ignacio García seems
more convenient.

```

### Re: Consecutive theorems

```
Ignacio García wrote:

Luca Brandolini wrote:

I am trying to write two consecutive theorems in my paper. However Lyx
always joints the two theorems into a single enviromes.
The only way seems to insert a non-empty line in between.
Is there a solution for this?

Yes, increase the nesting depth of the consecutive theorems

The other solution, probably preferable, is to use the Separator
environment between the theorems. This does nothing but separate the
environments, so that LyX will treat them as distinct.

rh

```

### Re: Consecutive theorems

```Luca Brandolini wrote:

I am trying to write two consecutive theorems in my paper. However Lyx
always joints the two theorems into a single enviromes.
The only way seems to insert a non-empty line in between.
Is there a solution for this?

Yes, increase the nesting depth of the consecutive theorems

Regards

```

### Re: Consecutive theorems

```On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Luca
Brandoliniluca.brandol...@unibg.it wrote:
I am trying to write two consecutive theorems in my paper. However Lyx
always joints the two theorems into a single enviromes.
The only way seems to insert a non-empty line in between.
Is there a solution for this?

Yes. Put a non-empty line inbetween. Its what I do :)

I put a line inbetween and either put a empty ERT in, or put an empty
note (Alt I-N-N) in to produce a non-empty line

Another trick I use is to insert a Branch. I have a branch called
All which I always leave enabled. Then, if I want to e.g. have a
enumerate environment within a proof, I insert a Branch All and put
the enumerate within the Branch. That said, for this purpose,
increasing the environment depth as suggested by Ignacio García seems
more convenient.

```

### Re: Consecutive theorems

```
Ignacio García wrote:

Luca Brandolini wrote:

I am trying to write two consecutive theorems in my paper. However Lyx
always joints the two theorems into a single enviromes.
The only way seems to insert a non-empty line in between.
Is there a solution for this?

Yes, increase the nesting depth of the consecutive theorems

The other solution, probably preferable, is to use the Separator
environment between the theorems. This does nothing but separate the
environments, so that LyX will treat them as distinct.

rh

```

### Re: Consecutive theorems

```Luca Brandolini wrote:

> I am trying to write two consecutive theorems in my paper. However Lyx
> always joints the two theorems into a single enviromes.
> The only way seems to insert a non-empty line in between.
> Is there a solution for this?

Yes, increase the nesting depth of the consecutive theorems

Regards

```

### Re: Consecutive theorems

```On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Luca
Brandolini wrote:
> I am trying to write two consecutive theorems in my paper. However Lyx
> always joints the two theorems into a single enviromes.
> The only way seems to insert a non-empty line in between.
> Is there a solution for this?

Yes. Put a non-empty line inbetween. Its what I do :)

I put a line inbetween and either put a empty ERT in, or put an empty
note (Alt I-N-N) in to produce a "non-empty" line

Another trick I use is to insert a "Branch". I have a branch called
"All" which I always leave enabled. Then, if I want to e.g. have a
enumerate environment within a proof, I insert a "Branch All" and put
the enumerate within the Branch. That said, for this purpose,
increasing the environment depth as suggested by Ignacio García seems
more convenient.

```

### Re: Consecutive theorems

```
Ignacio García wrote:

Luca Brandolini wrote:

I am trying to write two consecutive theorems in my paper. However Lyx
always joints the two theorems into a single enviromes.
The only way seems to insert a non-empty line in between.
Is there a solution for this?

Yes, increase the nesting depth of the consecutive theorems

The other solution, probably preferable, is to use the "Separator"
environment between the theorems. This does nothing but separate the
environments, so that LyX will treat them as distinct.

rh

```