Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-11-16 Thread Peter Coles
Yes this was exactly what I was looking for -- the ability to toggle the visibility of those blue edits. Matts I second Matts' request. Especially for heavy editing of a document, it would be a nice feature to be able to edit away, with changes tracked in the background. All those blue

Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-11-16 Thread Peter Coles
Yes this was exactly what I was looking for -- the ability to toggle the visibility of those blue edits. Matts I second Matts' request. Especially for heavy editing of a document, it would be a nice feature to be able to edit away, with changes tracked in the background. All those blue

Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-11-16 Thread Peter Coles
> Yes this was exactly what I was looking for -- the ability to toggle the > visibility of those blue edits. > > Matts I second Matts' request. Especially for heavy editing of a document, it would be a nice feature to be able to edit away, with changes tracked in the background. All those blue

Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-09-16 Thread Matts Lindström
The later situation actually seems very useful to me: you just edit your file without those horrible blue texts, but LyX keeps track of the changes nevertheless. JMarc Yes this was exactly what I was looking for -- the ability to toggle the visibility of those blue edits. Matts

Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-09-16 Thread Matts Lindström
The later situation actually seems very useful to me: you just edit your file without those horrible blue texts, but LyX keeps track of the changes nevertheless. JMarc Yes this was exactly what I was looking for -- the ability to toggle the visibility of those blue edits. Matts

Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-09-16 Thread Matts Lindström
> > > The later situation actually seems very useful to me: you just edit your > file without those horrible blue texts, but LyX keeps track of the > changes nevertheless. > > JMarc > Yes this was exactly what I was looking for -- the ability to toggle the visibility of those blue edits. Matts

Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-09-15 Thread rgheck
On 09/15/2009 04:06 AM, Matts Lindström wrote: Hi, Is it somehow possible to hide tracked changes in the lyx editor without choosing to accept/reject them? This is possible in Word, and a function which I find very convenient as it makes the display a lot less cluttered, while still preserving

Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-09-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com writes: At present, no, this isn't possible. It's a reasonable suggestion, though. Yes, definitely. I think you should add an enhancement request in trac (I am not sure how easy it is, though) Perhaps the right way to implement it would be just to stop showing

Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-09-15 Thread rgheck
On 09/15/2009 04:06 AM, Matts Lindström wrote: Hi, Is it somehow possible to hide tracked changes in the lyx editor without choosing to accept/reject them? This is possible in Word, and a function which I find very convenient as it makes the display a lot less cluttered, while still preserving

Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-09-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com writes: At present, no, this isn't possible. It's a reasonable suggestion, though. Yes, definitely. I think you should add an enhancement request in trac (I am not sure how easy it is, though) Perhaps the right way to implement it would be just to stop showing

Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-09-15 Thread rgheck
On 09/15/2009 04:06 AM, Matts Lindström wrote: Hi, Is it somehow possible to hide tracked changes in the lyx editor without choosing to accept/reject them? This is possible in Word, and a function which I find very convenient as it makes the display a lot less cluttered, while still preserving

Re: Hide tracked changes?

2009-09-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck writes: > At present, no, this isn't possible. It's a reasonable suggestion, > though. Yes, definitely. I think you should add an enhancement request in trac (I am not sure how easy it is, though) > Perhaps the right way to implement it would be just to stop showing