On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off hyphenation
(however one would do that). But a
On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off hyphenation
(however one would do that). But a
On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off hyphenation
(however one would do that). But a
On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
time hyphenation's decrease in legibility and readability isn't worth
its aesthetic contribution. I was just going to turn off
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 02:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> On 04/10/2012 02:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've always preferred legible over pretty, and my opinion is that most
>>> time hyphenation's decrease in