Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-21 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.comwrote:


 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  +checking for package bera [bera]... yes

 This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
 them in Document  Settings  Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)

 At this point, I'm baffled.

 BH


 Thanks for your help.

 I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just a
 symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
 matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
 Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get rid
 of it and start over.

 Your comments were still useful; I learned several things about trouble
 shooting my installation.

 -=- Rich


Well, there is nothing wrong with my TeX installation. I've been using
TeXShop to work directly in LaTeX and also to typeset LyX documents that I
have exported to LaTeX. All the fonts and utilities are available that are
supposed to be.

There were two things wrong with my LyX 1.6.5 installation, both easy to
correct once I understood what was going on.

Somehow these lines got into the preamble I've been using:

% set fonts for nicer pdf view

\IfFileExists{lmodern.sty}{\usepackage{lmodern}}{}

\fi % end if pdflatex is used


When I used pdflatex to typeset a document, these lines were substituting
Latin Modern for any fonts I was choosing in Lyx.


The second problem is that LyX was showing the Bera fonts as 'not
installed', even though they are and I can use them to typeset a document
(once I had figured out and corrected the first problem). For some reason,
LyX is not adding the correct information to the packages.lst file (which on
OS X is in ~/Library/Application Support/LyX-1.6/), even though the
configure.log file shows that the reconfigure procedure is correctly seeing
that the Bera fonts are installed and available. So I just added a line with
the word 'bera' to the packages.lst file and the 'not installed' message
went away.


-=- Rich


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-21 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.comwrote:


 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  +checking for package bera [bera]... yes

 This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
 them in Document  Settings  Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)

 At this point, I'm baffled.

 BH


 Thanks for your help.

 I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just a
 symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
 matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
 Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get rid
 of it and start over.

 Your comments were still useful; I learned several things about trouble
 shooting my installation.

 -=- Rich


Well, there is nothing wrong with my TeX installation. I've been using
TeXShop to work directly in LaTeX and also to typeset LyX documents that I
have exported to LaTeX. All the fonts and utilities are available that are
supposed to be.

There were two things wrong with my LyX 1.6.5 installation, both easy to
correct once I understood what was going on.

Somehow these lines got into the preamble I've been using:

% set fonts for nicer pdf view

\IfFileExists{lmodern.sty}{\usepackage{lmodern}}{}

\fi % end if pdflatex is used


When I used pdflatex to typeset a document, these lines were substituting
Latin Modern for any fonts I was choosing in Lyx.


The second problem is that LyX was showing the Bera fonts as 'not
installed', even though they are and I can use them to typeset a document
(once I had figured out and corrected the first problem). For some reason,
LyX is not adding the correct information to the packages.lst file (which on
OS X is in ~/Library/Application Support/LyX-1.6/), even though the
configure.log file shows that the reconfigure procedure is correctly seeing
that the Bera fonts are installed and available. So I just added a line with
the word 'bera' to the packages.lst file and the 'not installed' message
went away.


-=- Rich


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-21 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Richard Talley wrote:

>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH  wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +checking for package bera [bera]... yes
>>
>> This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
>> them in Document > Settings > Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)
>>
>> At this point, I'm baffled.
>>
>> BH
>>
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just a
> symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
> matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
> Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get rid
> of it and start over.
>
> Your comments were still useful; I learned several things about trouble
> shooting my installation.
>
> -=- Rich
>
>
Well, there is nothing wrong with my TeX installation. I've been using
TeXShop to work directly in LaTeX and also to typeset LyX documents that I
have exported to LaTeX. All the fonts and utilities are available that are
supposed to be.

There were two things wrong with my LyX 1.6.5 installation, both easy to
correct once I understood what was going on.

Somehow these lines got into the preamble I've been using:

% set fonts for nicer pdf view

\IfFileExists{lmodern.sty}{\usepackage{lmodern}}{}

\fi % end if pdflatex is used


When I used pdflatex to typeset a document, these lines were substituting
Latin Modern for any fonts I was choosing in Lyx.


The second problem is that LyX was showing the Bera fonts as 'not
installed', even though they are and I can use them to typeset a document
(once I had figured out and corrected the first problem). For some reason,
LyX is not adding the correct information to the packages.lst file (which on
OS X is in ~/Library/Application Support/LyX-1.6/), even though the
configure.log file shows that the reconfigure procedure is correctly seeing
that the Bera fonts are installed and available. So I just added a line with
the word 'bera' to the packages.lst file and the 'not installed' message
went away.


-=- Rich


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 +checking for package bera [bera]... yes
 
 This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
 them in Document  Settings  Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)
 
 At this point, I'm baffled.
 
 BH
 
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just a
 symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
 matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
 Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get rid
 of it and start over.
...

I guess you already tried sudo texhash from the terminal?

/Anders


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Richard Talley
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Anders Ekberg a...@mac.com wrote:

 On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote:

  Thanks for your help.
 
  I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just
 a
  symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
  matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
  Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get
 rid
  of it and start over.
 ...

 I guess you already tried sudo texhash from the terminal?

 /Anders


Strictly speaking I shouldn't have to, as both the MacTeX installer and the
update utility do so. However, I did run it manually, just in case.

-=- Rich


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 +checking for package bera [bera]... yes
 
 This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
 them in Document  Settings  Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)
 
 At this point, I'm baffled.
 
 BH
 
 
 Thanks for your help.
 
 I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just a
 symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
 matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
 Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get rid
 of it and start over.
...

I guess you already tried sudo texhash from the terminal?

/Anders


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Richard Talley
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Anders Ekberg a...@mac.com wrote:

 On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote:

  Thanks for your help.
 
  I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just
 a
  symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
  matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
  Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get
 rid
  of it and start over.
 ...

 I guess you already tried sudo texhash from the terminal?

 /Anders


Strictly speaking I shouldn't have to, as both the MacTeX installer and the
update utility do so. However, I did run it manually, just in case.

-=- Rich


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH  wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +checking for package bera [bera]... yes
>> 
>> This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
>> them in Document > Settings > Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)
>> 
>> At this point, I'm baffled.
>> 
>> BH
>> 
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> 
> I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just a
> symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
> matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
> Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get rid
> of it and start over.
...

I guess you already tried sudo texhash from the terminal?

/Anders


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-18 Thread Richard Talley
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Anders Ekberg  wrote:

> On 18 mar 2010, at 00.33, Richard Talley wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just
> a
> > symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
> > matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
> > Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get
> rid
> > of it and start over.
> ...
>
> I guess you already tried sudo texhash from the terminal?
>
> /Anders
>

Strictly speaking I shouldn't have to, as both the MacTeX installer and the
update utility do so. However, I did run it manually, just in case.

-=- Rich


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:
 I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and created
 a number of documents using the three Bera fonts.

 Recently, I downloaded, installed and updated MacTeX 2009. I also grabbed
 the MacTeXtras; it came with LyX 1.6.5 so I installed that also.

 Now LyX doesn't see that the Bera fonts are available (they show as 'not
 installed' in Documents - Settings - Fonts). If I switch back to MacTeX
 2008 (which I have not uninstalled but would like too) and reconfigure LyX,
 these fonts still show as not installed.

 MacTeX 2008 and 2009 most definitely do come with the Bera fonts installed;
 all the correct files appear to be there.

 I really need to convince LyX 1.6.5 that these fonts are indeed installed
 and available, as I need to re-edit some documents and have them print using
 the same standards that I was already using for this series of documents.
 (And yes, I did re-run 'sudo texhash', just in case, and ran the
 LyX-installer that comes on the LyX-1.6.5-Mac-Universal.dmg.)

 Any suggestions would be appreciated. I haven't yet downgraded to LyX 1.6.3;
 I guess that might be my next step in troubleshooting.

Have you tried reconfiguring LyX? (LyX  Reconfigure) I have MacTeX
2009, and the Bera fonts are properly recognized by LyX.

BH


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and
 created
  a number of documents using the three Bera fonts.
 
  Recently, I downloaded, installed and updated MacTeX 2009. I also grabbed
  the MacTeXtras; it came with LyX 1.6.5 so I installed that also.
 
  Now LyX doesn't see that the Bera fonts are available (they show as 'not
  installed' in Documents - Settings - Fonts). If I switch back to MacTeX
  2008 (which I have not uninstalled but would like too) and reconfigure
 LyX,
  these fonts still show as not installed.
 
  MacTeX 2008 and 2009 most definitely do come with the Bera fonts
 installed;
  all the correct files appear to be there.
 
  I really need to convince LyX 1.6.5 that these fonts are indeed installed
  and available, as I need to re-edit some documents and have them print
 using
  the same standards that I was already using for this series of documents.
  (And yes, I did re-run 'sudo texhash', just in case, and ran the
  LyX-installer that comes on the LyX-1.6.5-Mac-Universal.dmg.)
 
  Any suggestions would be appreciated. I haven't yet downgraded to LyX
 1.6.3;
  I guess that might be my next step in troubleshooting.

 Have you tried reconfiguring LyX? (LyX  Reconfigure) I have MacTeX
 2009, and the Bera fonts are properly recognized by LyX.

 BH



Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich

1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX  Preferences  Paths  PATH Prefix)

2. From within Terminal.app, try:

kpsewhich bera.sty

Does it return the path to your installation of bera? (If not, then
it's a MacTeX issue.)

3. Again in Terminal.app, try:

/path/to/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/configure.py

(substituting the appropriate thing for /path/to -- the default
would be /Applications). Paste the output into an e-mail to the
list.

BH


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich

 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX  Preferences  Paths  PATH Prefix)


/usr/texbin:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/opt/local/teTeX/bin:/opt/local/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin




 2. From within Terminal.app, try:

 kpsewhich bera.sty

 Does it return the path to your installation of bera? (If not, then
 it's a MacTeX issue.)


Yes, it returns this:

/usr/local/texlive/2009/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bera/bera.sty



 3. Again in Terminal.app, try:

 /path/to/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/configure.py

 (substituting the appropriate thing for /path/to -- the default
 would be /Applications). Paste the output into an e-mail to the
 list.

 BH


Here's the output (same thing as appears in ~/Library/Application
Support/LyX-1.6/configure.log when I run LyX - Reconfigure).

checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex...   yes
checking for a DVI postprocessing program...
+checking for pplatex...   no
checking for pLaTeX, the Japanese LaTeX...
+checking for platex...   no
checking for a Tgif viewer and editor...
+checking for tgif...   no
checking for a FIG viewer and editor...
+checking for xfig...   no
+checking for jfig3-itext.jar...   no
+checking for jfig3.jar...   no
checking for a Dia viewer and editor...
+checking for dia...   no
checking for a Grace viewer and editor...
+checking for xmgrace...   no
checking for a FEN viewer and editor...
+checking for xboard...   no
checking for a raster image viewer...
+checking for xv...   no
+checking for kview...   no
+checking for gimp-remote...   no
+checking for gimp...   no
checking for a raster image editor...
+checking for gimp-remote...   no
+checking for gimp...   no
checking for a text editor...
+checking for sensible-editor...   no
+checking for xemacs...   no
+checking for gvim...   no
+checking for kedit...   no
+checking for kwrite...   no
+checking for kate...   no
+checking for nedit...   no
+checking for gedit...   no
+checking for notepad...   no
checking for a BibTeX editor...
+checking for sensible-editor...   no
+checking for jabref...   no
+checking for JabRef...   no
+checking for pybliographic...   no
+checking for bibdesk...   no
+checking for gbib...   no
+checking for kbib...   no
+checking for kbibtex...   no
+checking for sixpack...   no
+checking for bibedit...   no
+checking for tkbibtexxemacs...   no
+checking for gvim...   no
+checking for kedit...   no
+checking for kwrite...   no
+checking for kate...   no
+checking for nedit...   no
+checking for gedit...   no
+checking for notepad...   no
checking for a Postscript previewer...
+checking for kghostview...   no
+checking for okular...   no
+checking for evince...   no
+checking for gv...   no
+checking for ghostview...   no
checking for a PDF previewer...
+checking for kpdf...   no
+checking for okular...   no
+checking for evince...   no
+checking for kghostview...   no
+checking for xpdf...   no
+checking for acrobat...   no
+checking for acroread...   no
+checking for gv...   no
+checking for ghostview...   no
checking for a DVI previewer...
+checking for xdvi...   yes
checking for an HTML previewer...
+checking for firefox...   no
+checking for mozilla...   no
+checking for netscape...   no
checking for Noteedit...
+checking for noteedit...   no
checking for an OpenDocument viewer...
+checking for swriter...   no
+checking for oowriter...   no
checking for the pdflatex program...
+checking for pdflatex...   yes
checking for a LaTeX/Noweb - LyX converter...
+checking for tex2lyx...   no
+checking for tex2lyx...   no
checking for a Noweb - LaTeX converter...
+checking for noweave...   no
checking for an HTML - LaTeX converter...
+checking for html2latex...   no
+checking for gnuhtml2latex...   no
+checking for htmltolatex...   no
+checking for java...   yes
checking for an MS Word - LaTeX converter...
+checking for wvCleanLatex...   no
checking for elyxer module...
no
checking for a LyX - HTML converter...
+checking for elyxer.py...   no
+checking for elyxer...   no
checking for a LaTeX - HTML converter...
+checking for htlatex...   yes
checking for a LaTeX - MS Word converter...
+checking for htlatex...   yes
checking for an OpenOffice.org - LaTeX converter...
+checking for w2l...   no
checking for an OpenDocument - LaTeX converter...
+checking for w2l...   no
checking for a LaTeX - Open Document converter...
+checking for oolatex...   no
+checking for mk4ht...   yes
checking for a LaTeX - RTF converter...
+checking for latex2rtf...   no
+checking for latex2rt...   no
checking for a RTF - HTML converter...
+checking for unrtf...   no
checking for a PS to PDF converter...
+checking for 

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich

 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX  Preferences  Paths  PATH Prefix)

 /usr/texbin:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/opt/local/teTeX/bin:/opt/local/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin

That's as it should be.

 2. From within Terminal.app, try:

 kpsewhich bera.sty

 Does it return the path to your installation of bera? (If not, then
 it's a MacTeX issue.)

 Yes, it returns this:
 /usr/local/texlive/2009/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bera/bera.sty

That's good.

 3. Again in Terminal.app, try:

 /path/to/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/configure.py

 (substituting the appropriate thing for /path/to -- the default
 would be /Applications). Paste the output into an e-mail to the
 list.

 Here's the output (same thing as appears in ~/Library/Application
 Support/LyX-1.6/configure.log when I run LyX - Reconfigure).

snip

 +checking for package bera [bera]... yes

This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
them in Document  Settings  Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)

At this point, I'm baffled.

BH


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  +checking for package bera [bera]... yes

 This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
 them in Document  Settings  Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)

 At this point, I'm baffled.

 BH


Thanks for your help.

I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just a
symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get rid
of it and start over.

Your comments were still useful; I learned several things about trouble
shooting my installation.

-=- Rich


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:
 I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and created
 a number of documents using the three Bera fonts.

 Recently, I downloaded, installed and updated MacTeX 2009. I also grabbed
 the MacTeXtras; it came with LyX 1.6.5 so I installed that also.

 Now LyX doesn't see that the Bera fonts are available (they show as 'not
 installed' in Documents - Settings - Fonts). If I switch back to MacTeX
 2008 (which I have not uninstalled but would like too) and reconfigure LyX,
 these fonts still show as not installed.

 MacTeX 2008 and 2009 most definitely do come with the Bera fonts installed;
 all the correct files appear to be there.

 I really need to convince LyX 1.6.5 that these fonts are indeed installed
 and available, as I need to re-edit some documents and have them print using
 the same standards that I was already using for this series of documents.
 (And yes, I did re-run 'sudo texhash', just in case, and ran the
 LyX-installer that comes on the LyX-1.6.5-Mac-Universal.dmg.)

 Any suggestions would be appreciated. I haven't yet downgraded to LyX 1.6.3;
 I guess that might be my next step in troubleshooting.

Have you tried reconfiguring LyX? (LyX  Reconfigure) I have MacTeX
2009, and the Bera fonts are properly recognized by LyX.

BH


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and
 created
  a number of documents using the three Bera fonts.
 
  Recently, I downloaded, installed and updated MacTeX 2009. I also grabbed
  the MacTeXtras; it came with LyX 1.6.5 so I installed that also.
 
  Now LyX doesn't see that the Bera fonts are available (they show as 'not
  installed' in Documents - Settings - Fonts). If I switch back to MacTeX
  2008 (which I have not uninstalled but would like too) and reconfigure
 LyX,
  these fonts still show as not installed.
 
  MacTeX 2008 and 2009 most definitely do come with the Bera fonts
 installed;
  all the correct files appear to be there.
 
  I really need to convince LyX 1.6.5 that these fonts are indeed installed
  and available, as I need to re-edit some documents and have them print
 using
  the same standards that I was already using for this series of documents.
  (And yes, I did re-run 'sudo texhash', just in case, and ran the
  LyX-installer that comes on the LyX-1.6.5-Mac-Universal.dmg.)
 
  Any suggestions would be appreciated. I haven't yet downgraded to LyX
 1.6.3;
  I guess that might be my next step in troubleshooting.

 Have you tried reconfiguring LyX? (LyX  Reconfigure) I have MacTeX
 2009, and the Bera fonts are properly recognized by LyX.

 BH



Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich

1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX  Preferences  Paths  PATH Prefix)

2. From within Terminal.app, try:

kpsewhich bera.sty

Does it return the path to your installation of bera? (If not, then
it's a MacTeX issue.)

3. Again in Terminal.app, try:

/path/to/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/configure.py

(substituting the appropriate thing for /path/to -- the default
would be /Applications). Paste the output into an e-mail to the
list.

BH


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich

 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX  Preferences  Paths  PATH Prefix)


/usr/texbin:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/opt/local/teTeX/bin:/opt/local/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin




 2. From within Terminal.app, try:

 kpsewhich bera.sty

 Does it return the path to your installation of bera? (If not, then
 it's a MacTeX issue.)


Yes, it returns this:

/usr/local/texlive/2009/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bera/bera.sty



 3. Again in Terminal.app, try:

 /path/to/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/configure.py

 (substituting the appropriate thing for /path/to -- the default
 would be /Applications). Paste the output into an e-mail to the
 list.

 BH


Here's the output (same thing as appears in ~/Library/Application
Support/LyX-1.6/configure.log when I run LyX - Reconfigure).

checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for latex...   yes
checking for a DVI postprocessing program...
+checking for pplatex...   no
checking for pLaTeX, the Japanese LaTeX...
+checking for platex...   no
checking for a Tgif viewer and editor...
+checking for tgif...   no
checking for a FIG viewer and editor...
+checking for xfig...   no
+checking for jfig3-itext.jar...   no
+checking for jfig3.jar...   no
checking for a Dia viewer and editor...
+checking for dia...   no
checking for a Grace viewer and editor...
+checking for xmgrace...   no
checking for a FEN viewer and editor...
+checking for xboard...   no
checking for a raster image viewer...
+checking for xv...   no
+checking for kview...   no
+checking for gimp-remote...   no
+checking for gimp...   no
checking for a raster image editor...
+checking for gimp-remote...   no
+checking for gimp...   no
checking for a text editor...
+checking for sensible-editor...   no
+checking for xemacs...   no
+checking for gvim...   no
+checking for kedit...   no
+checking for kwrite...   no
+checking for kate...   no
+checking for nedit...   no
+checking for gedit...   no
+checking for notepad...   no
checking for a BibTeX editor...
+checking for sensible-editor...   no
+checking for jabref...   no
+checking for JabRef...   no
+checking for pybliographic...   no
+checking for bibdesk...   no
+checking for gbib...   no
+checking for kbib...   no
+checking for kbibtex...   no
+checking for sixpack...   no
+checking for bibedit...   no
+checking for tkbibtexxemacs...   no
+checking for gvim...   no
+checking for kedit...   no
+checking for kwrite...   no
+checking for kate...   no
+checking for nedit...   no
+checking for gedit...   no
+checking for notepad...   no
checking for a Postscript previewer...
+checking for kghostview...   no
+checking for okular...   no
+checking for evince...   no
+checking for gv...   no
+checking for ghostview...   no
checking for a PDF previewer...
+checking for kpdf...   no
+checking for okular...   no
+checking for evince...   no
+checking for kghostview...   no
+checking for xpdf...   no
+checking for acrobat...   no
+checking for acroread...   no
+checking for gv...   no
+checking for ghostview...   no
checking for a DVI previewer...
+checking for xdvi...   yes
checking for an HTML previewer...
+checking for firefox...   no
+checking for mozilla...   no
+checking for netscape...   no
checking for Noteedit...
+checking for noteedit...   no
checking for an OpenDocument viewer...
+checking for swriter...   no
+checking for oowriter...   no
checking for the pdflatex program...
+checking for pdflatex...   yes
checking for a LaTeX/Noweb - LyX converter...
+checking for tex2lyx...   no
+checking for tex2lyx...   no
checking for a Noweb - LaTeX converter...
+checking for noweave...   no
checking for an HTML - LaTeX converter...
+checking for html2latex...   no
+checking for gnuhtml2latex...   no
+checking for htmltolatex...   no
+checking for java...   yes
checking for an MS Word - LaTeX converter...
+checking for wvCleanLatex...   no
checking for elyxer module...
no
checking for a LyX - HTML converter...
+checking for elyxer.py...   no
+checking for elyxer...   no
checking for a LaTeX - HTML converter...
+checking for htlatex...   yes
checking for a LaTeX - MS Word converter...
+checking for htlatex...   yes
checking for an OpenOffice.org - LaTeX converter...
+checking for w2l...   no
checking for an OpenDocument - LaTeX converter...
+checking for w2l...   no
checking for a LaTeX - Open Document converter...
+checking for oolatex...   no
+checking for mk4ht...   yes
checking for a LaTeX - RTF converter...
+checking for latex2rtf...   no
+checking for latex2rt...   no
checking for a RTF - HTML converter...
+checking for unrtf...   no
checking for a PS to PDF converter...
+checking for 

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich

 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX  Preferences  Paths  PATH Prefix)

 /usr/texbin:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/opt/local/teTeX/bin:/opt/local/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin

That's as it should be.

 2. From within Terminal.app, try:

 kpsewhich bera.sty

 Does it return the path to your installation of bera? (If not, then
 it's a MacTeX issue.)

 Yes, it returns this:
 /usr/local/texlive/2009/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bera/bera.sty

That's good.

 3. Again in Terminal.app, try:

 /path/to/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/configure.py

 (substituting the appropriate thing for /path/to -- the default
 would be /Applications). Paste the output into an e-mail to the
 list.

 Here's the output (same thing as appears in ~/Library/Application
 Support/LyX-1.6/configure.log when I run LyX - Reconfigure).

snip

 +checking for package bera [bera]... yes

This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
them in Document  Settings  Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)

At this point, I'm baffled.

BH


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  +checking for package bera [bera]... yes

 This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
 them in Document  Settings  Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)

 At this point, I'm baffled.

 BH


Thanks for your help.

I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just a
symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get rid
of it and start over.

Your comments were still useful; I learned several things about trouble
shooting my installation.

-=- Rich


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley  wrote:
> I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and created
> a number of documents using the three Bera fonts.
>
> Recently, I downloaded, installed and updated MacTeX 2009. I also grabbed
> the MacTeXtras; it came with LyX 1.6.5 so I installed that also.
>
> Now LyX doesn't see that the Bera fonts are available (they show as 'not
> installed' in Documents -> Settings -> Fonts). If I switch back to MacTeX
> 2008 (which I have not uninstalled but would like too) and reconfigure LyX,
> these fonts still show as not installed.
>
> MacTeX 2008 and 2009 most definitely do come with the Bera fonts installed;
> all the correct files appear to be there.
>
> I really need to convince LyX 1.6.5 that these fonts are indeed installed
> and available, as I need to re-edit some documents and have them print using
> the same standards that I was already using for this series of documents.
> (And yes, I did re-run 'sudo texhash', just in case, and ran the
> LyX-installer that comes on the LyX-1.6.5-Mac-Universal.dmg.)
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated. I haven't yet downgraded to LyX 1.6.3;
> I guess that might be my next step in troubleshooting.

Have you tried reconfiguring LyX? (LyX > Reconfigure) I have MacTeX
2009, and the Bera fonts are properly recognized by LyX.

BH


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM, BH  wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Richard Talley 
> wrote:
> > I had been running LyX 1.6.3 with MacTeX 2008 under OS X 10.5.x and
> created
> > a number of documents using the three Bera fonts.
> >
> > Recently, I downloaded, installed and updated MacTeX 2009. I also grabbed
> > the MacTeXtras; it came with LyX 1.6.5 so I installed that also.
> >
> > Now LyX doesn't see that the Bera fonts are available (they show as 'not
> > installed' in Documents -> Settings -> Fonts). If I switch back to MacTeX
> > 2008 (which I have not uninstalled but would like too) and reconfigure
> LyX,
> > these fonts still show as not installed.
> >
> > MacTeX 2008 and 2009 most definitely do come with the Bera fonts
> installed;
> > all the correct files appear to be there.
> >
> > I really need to convince LyX 1.6.5 that these fonts are indeed installed
> > and available, as I need to re-edit some documents and have them print
> using
> > the same standards that I was already using for this series of documents.
> > (And yes, I did re-run 'sudo texhash', just in case, and ran the
> > LyX-installer that comes on the LyX-1.6.5-Mac-Universal.dmg.)
> >
> > Any suggestions would be appreciated. I haven't yet downgraded to LyX
> 1.6.3;
> > I guess that might be my next step in troubleshooting.
>
> Have you tried reconfiguring LyX? (LyX > Reconfigure) I have MacTeX
> 2009, and the Bera fonts are properly recognized by LyX.
>
> BH
>


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley  wrote:
> Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich

1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX > Preferences > Paths > PATH Prefix)

2. From within Terminal.app, try:

kpsewhich bera.sty

Does it return the path to your installation of bera? (If not, then
it's a MacTeX issue.)

3. Again in Terminal.app, try:

/path/to/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/configure.py

(substituting the appropriate thing for "/path/to" -- the default
would be "/Applications"). Paste the output into an e-mail to the
list.

BH


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH  wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley 
> wrote:
> > Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich
>
> 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX > Preferences > Paths > PATH Prefix)
>

/usr/texbin:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/opt/local/teTeX/bin:/opt/local/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin



>
> 2. From within Terminal.app, try:
>
> kpsewhich bera.sty
>
> Does it return the path to your installation of bera? (If not, then
> it's a MacTeX issue.)
>

Yes, it returns this:

/usr/local/texlive/2009/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bera/bera.sty


>
> 3. Again in Terminal.app, try:
>
> /path/to/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/configure.py
>
> (substituting the appropriate thing for "/path/to" -- the default
> would be "/Applications"). Paste the output into an e-mail to the
> list.
>
> BH
>

Here's the output (same thing as appears in ~/Library/Application
Support/LyX-1.6/configure.log when I run LyX -> Reconfigure).

checking for a Latex2e program...
+checking for "latex"...   yes
checking for a DVI postprocessing program...
+checking for "pplatex"...   no
checking for pLaTeX, the Japanese LaTeX...
+checking for "platex"...   no
checking for a Tgif viewer and editor...
+checking for "tgif"...   no
checking for a FIG viewer and editor...
+checking for "xfig"...   no
+checking for "jfig3-itext.jar"...   no
+checking for "jfig3.jar"...   no
checking for a Dia viewer and editor...
+checking for "dia"...   no
checking for a Grace viewer and editor...
+checking for "xmgrace"...   no
checking for a FEN viewer and editor...
+checking for "xboard"...   no
checking for a raster image viewer...
+checking for "xv"...   no
+checking for "kview"...   no
+checking for "gimp-remote"...   no
+checking for "gimp"...   no
checking for a raster image editor...
+checking for "gimp-remote"...   no
+checking for "gimp"...   no
checking for a text editor...
+checking for "sensible-editor"...   no
+checking for "xemacs"...   no
+checking for "gvim"...   no
+checking for "kedit"...   no
+checking for "kwrite"...   no
+checking for "kate"...   no
+checking for "nedit"...   no
+checking for "gedit"...   no
+checking for "notepad"...   no
checking for a BibTeX editor...
+checking for "sensible-editor"...   no
+checking for "jabref"...   no
+checking for "JabRef"...   no
+checking for "pybliographic"...   no
+checking for "bibdesk"...   no
+checking for "gbib"...   no
+checking for "kbib"...   no
+checking for "kbibtex"...   no
+checking for "sixpack"...   no
+checking for "bibedit"...   no
+checking for "tkbibtexxemacs"...   no
+checking for "gvim"...   no
+checking for "kedit"...   no
+checking for "kwrite"...   no
+checking for "kate"...   no
+checking for "nedit"...   no
+checking for "gedit"...   no
+checking for "notepad"...   no
checking for a Postscript previewer...
+checking for "kghostview"...   no
+checking for "okular"...   no
+checking for "evince"...   no
+checking for "gv"...   no
+checking for "ghostview"...   no
checking for a PDF previewer...
+checking for "kpdf"...   no
+checking for "okular"...   no
+checking for "evince"...   no
+checking for "kghostview"...   no
+checking for "xpdf"...   no
+checking for "acrobat"...   no
+checking for "acroread"...   no
+checking for "gv"...   no
+checking for "ghostview"...   no
checking for a DVI previewer...
+checking for "xdvi"...   yes
checking for an HTML previewer...
+checking for "firefox"...   no
+checking for "mozilla"...   no
+checking for "netscape"...   no
checking for Noteedit...
+checking for "noteedit"...   no
checking for an OpenDocument viewer...
+checking for "swriter"...   no
+checking for "oowriter"...   no
checking for the pdflatex program...
+checking for "pdflatex"...   yes
checking for a LaTeX/Noweb -> LyX converter...
+checking for "tex2lyx"...   no
+checking for "tex2lyx"...   no
checking for a Noweb -> LaTeX converter...
+checking for "noweave"...   no
checking for an HTML -> LaTeX converter...
+checking for "html2latex"...   no
+checking for "gnuhtml2latex"...   no
+checking for "htmltolatex"...   no
+checking for "java"...   yes
checking for an MS Word -> LaTeX converter...
+checking for "wvCleanLatex"...   no
checking for "elyxer module"...
no
checking for a LyX -> HTML converter...
+checking for "elyxer.py"...   no
+checking for "elyxer"...   no
checking for a LaTeX -> HTML converter...
+checking for "htlatex"...   yes
checking for a LaTeX -> MS Word converter...
+checking for "htlatex"...   yes
checking for an OpenOffice.org -> LaTeX converter...
+checking for "w2l"...   no
checking for an OpenDocument -> LaTeX converter...
+checking for "w2l"...   no
checking for a LaTeX -> Open Document converter...
+checking for "oolatex"...   no
+checking for "mk4ht"...   yes
checking for a 

Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread BH
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley  wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, BH  wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Richard Talley 
>> wrote:
>> > Yes, I did reconfigure LyX.  -=- Rich
>>
>> 1. What is your PATH Prefix? (LyX > Preferences > Paths > PATH Prefix)
>
> /usr/texbin:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/gwTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current:/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/opt/local/teTeX/bin:/opt/local/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin

That's as it should be.

>> 2. From within Terminal.app, try:
>>
>> kpsewhich bera.sty
>>
>> Does it return the path to your installation of bera? (If not, then
>> it's a MacTeX issue.)
>
> Yes, it returns this:
> /usr/local/texlive/2009/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bera/bera.sty

That's good.

>> 3. Again in Terminal.app, try:
>>
>> /path/to/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/configure.py
>>
>> (substituting the appropriate thing for "/path/to" -- the default
>> would be "/Applications"). Paste the output into an e-mail to the
>> list.
>
> Here's the output (same thing as appears in ~/Library/Application
> Support/LyX-1.6/configure.log when I run LyX -> Reconfigure).



> +checking for package bera [bera]... yes

This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
them in Document > Settings > Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)

At this point, I'm baffled.

BH


Re: LyX 1.6.5 claims Bera fonts not installed

2010-03-17 Thread Richard Talley
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, BH  wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Richard Talley 
> wrote:
> >
> > +checking for package bera [bera]... yes
>
> This says it has found the bera fonts. So you should have access to
> them in Document > Settings > Fonts. (Are you sure you don't?)
>
> At this point, I'm baffled.
>
> BH
>

Thanks for your help.

I think that the indication that the Bera fonts are not installed is just a
symptom of a deeper problem; I appear to have lost all font control. No
matter what fonts I choose, I get a pdf that has the default LaTeX fonts.
Something is badly screwed up in my TeX installation; I'm going to get rid
of it and start over.

Your comments were still useful; I learned several things about trouble
shooting my installation.

-=- Rich