Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-05 Thread Olivier Ripoll
On 30.11.2011 23:05, Richard Heck wrote: Public release of LyX version 2.0.2 === We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.2. This is the second maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. LyX 2.0.2 is the result of on-going efforts to make our stable

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-05 Thread Richard Heck
On windows7, LyX 2.0.2's scrolling is somehow broken to me. LyX.exe takes 50% CPU (my machine is dual-core, so 50% CPU is max for many programs), triggers CPU fan to max, and is very laggy (non smooth). 2.0.1, with both installers (official and Uwe's) has no such issue and scrolls

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-05 Thread Olivier Ripoll
On 30.11.2011 23:05, Richard Heck wrote: Public release of LyX version 2.0.2 === We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.2. This is the second maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. LyX 2.0.2 is the result of on-going efforts to make our stable

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-05 Thread Richard Heck
On windows7, LyX 2.0.2's scrolling is somehow broken to me. LyX.exe takes 50% CPU (my machine is dual-core, so 50% CPU is max for many programs), triggers CPU fan to max, and is very laggy (non smooth). 2.0.1, with both installers (official and Uwe's) has no such issue and scrolls

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-05 Thread Olivier Ripoll
On 30.11.2011 23:05, Richard Heck wrote: Public release of LyX version 2.0.2 === We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.2. This is the second maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. LyX 2.0.2 is the result of on-going efforts to make our stable

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-05 Thread Richard Heck
On windows7, LyX 2.0.2's scrolling is somehow broken to me. LyX.exe takes 50% CPU (my machine is dual-core, so 50% CPU is max for many programs), triggers CPU fan to max, and is very laggy (non smooth). 2.0.1, with both installers (official and Uwe's) has no such issue and scrolls

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 11/30/2011 09:48 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: This is excellent news and I look forward to the improvements. Is there a recommended procedure for updating from 2.0.0? I have made some customizations (shortcuts, added modules, etc.) that I would like to retain if possible. Platform, etc? rh

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
Thank you very much! I hope that the bug that was blocking the Sage module has been corrected. Best regards, Murat 2011/12/1 Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net On 11/30/2011 09:48 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: This is excellent news and I look forward to the improvements. Is there a recommended

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Bert Lloyd
Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would appreciate advice as well.

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Bert Lloyd wrote: But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would appreciate advice as well. I've been building and installing LyX with the SlackBuild script for about 8 years. Just upgraded from -2.0.1 to -2.0.2 on Slackware-13.1 with no problems.

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 12/01/2011 12:30 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would appreciate advice as well. Well, on Linux, it's just not an issue. You install it, and it works out of the box. I

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Bert Lloyd
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 12/01/2011 12:30 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would appreciate advice as well. Well, on Linux,

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Bert Lloyd bert.lloyd...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 12/01/2011 12:30 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. But I am sure that there are others on

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 11/30/2011 09:48 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: This is excellent news and I look forward to the improvements. Is there a recommended procedure for updating from 2.0.0? I have made some customizations (shortcuts, added modules, etc.) that I would like to retain if possible. Platform, etc? rh

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
Thank you very much! I hope that the bug that was blocking the Sage module has been corrected. Best regards, Murat 2011/12/1 Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net On 11/30/2011 09:48 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: This is excellent news and I look forward to the improvements. Is there a recommended

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Bert Lloyd
Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would appreciate advice as well.

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Bert Lloyd wrote: But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would appreciate advice as well. I've been building and installing LyX with the SlackBuild script for about 8 years. Just upgraded from -2.0.1 to -2.0.2 on Slackware-13.1 with no problems.

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 12/01/2011 12:30 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would appreciate advice as well. Well, on Linux, it's just not an issue. You install it, and it works out of the box. I

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Bert Lloyd
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 12/01/2011 12:30 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would appreciate advice as well. Well, on Linux,

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Bert Lloyd bert.lloyd...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 12/01/2011 12:30 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. But I am sure that there are others on

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 11/30/2011 09:48 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: > This is excellent news and I look forward to the improvements. > > Is there a recommended procedure for updating from 2.0.0? I have made > some customizations (shortcuts, added modules, etc.) that I would like > to retain if possible. > Platform, etc?

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
Thank you very much! I hope that the bug that was blocking the Sage module has been corrected. Best regards, Murat 2011/12/1 Richard Heck > On 11/30/2011 09:48 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: > > This is excellent news and I look forward to the improvements. > > > > Is there a

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Bert Lloyd
Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would appreciate advice as well.

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Bert Lloyd wrote: But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would appreciate advice as well. I've been building and installing LyX with the SlackBuild script for about 8 years. Just upgraded from -2.0.1 to -2.0.2 on Slackware-13.1 with no problems.

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 12/01/2011 12:30 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: > Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. > > But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would > appreciate advice as well. > Well, on Linux, it's just not an issue. You install it, and it works out of the box. I

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Bert Lloyd
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 12/01/2011 12:30 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: >> Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. >> >> But I am sure that there are others on different OSs, etc, who would >> appreciate advice as well. >> >

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-12-01 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 12/01/2011 12:30 PM, Bert Lloyd wrote: >>> Windows 7 (64-bit), using MikTeX 2.9, upgrading from LyX 2.0.0. >>> >>> But I am sure that there

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-11-30 Thread Bert Lloyd
This is excellent news and I look forward to the improvements. Is there a recommended procedure for updating from 2.0.0? I have made some customizations (shortcuts, added modules, etc.) that I would like to retain if possible. Many thanks in advance.

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-11-30 Thread Bert Lloyd
This is excellent news and I look forward to the improvements. Is there a recommended procedure for updating from 2.0.0? I have made some customizations (shortcuts, added modules, etc.) that I would like to retain if possible. Many thanks in advance.

Re: LyX 2.0.2 Released

2011-11-30 Thread Bert Lloyd
This is excellent news and I look forward to the improvements. Is there a recommended procedure for updating from 2.0.0? I have made some customizations (shortcuts, added modules, etc.) that I would like to retain if possible. Many thanks in advance.