Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Wednesday 07 May 2014 20:54:15 Hugh Medal wrote: Here you go: This is what happens with system python (2.7.5): hmedal@ws113-16:~$ python -tt /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx ~/Documents/2_msu/1_MSU_Projects/PROJECT_CEED_ERS/what_I_can_offer/Optimal_Software_Design.lyx Optimal_Software_Design_converted.lyx Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx, line 24, in module import LyX File /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/LyX.py, line 26, in module import gzip File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/gzip.py, line 9, in module import zlib ImportError: No module named zlib The last line is the weird part. What is the output of $ which -a python It seems from the path of the call to gzip.py that you are using a version of python different from the system one. That is why I suspect that you have two python versions installed. The system install python into /usr not /usr/local and it seems that that is precisely what you are using and thus the error. FWIW the zlib module is present, in 64 bit install (x86-64), at /usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/zlibmodule.so -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Wednesday 07 May 2014 20:54:15 Hugh Medal wrote: Here you go: This is what happens with system python (2.7.5): hmedal@ws113-16:~$ python -tt /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx ~/Documents/2_msu/1_MSU_Projects/PROJECT_CEED_ERS/what_I_can_offer/Optimal_Software_Design.lyx Optimal_Software_Design_converted.lyx Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx, line 24, in module import LyX File /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/LyX.py, line 26, in module import gzip File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/gzip.py, line 9, in module import zlib ImportError: No module named zlib The last line is the weird part. What is the output of $ which -a python It seems from the path of the call to gzip.py that you are using a version of python different from the system one. That is why I suspect that you have two python versions installed. The system install python into /usr not /usr/local and it seems that that is precisely what you are using and thus the error. FWIW the zlib module is present, in 64 bit install (x86-64), at /usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/zlibmodule.so -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Wednesday 07 May 2014 20:54:15 Hugh Medal wrote: > Here you go: > > This is what happens with system python (2.7.5): > > hmedal@ws113-16:~$ python -tt /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx > ~/Documents/2_msu/1_MSU_Projects/PROJECT_CEED_ERS/what_I_can_offer/Optimal_Software_Design.lyx > > > Optimal_Software_Design_converted.lyx > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx", line 24, in > import LyX > File "/usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/LyX.py", line 26, in > import gzip > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/gzip.py", line 9, in > import zlib > ImportError: No module named zlib The last line is the weird part. What is the output of $ which -a python It seems from the path of the call to gzip.py that you are using a version of python different from the system one. That is why I suspect that you have two python versions installed. The system install python into /usr not /usr/local and it seems that that is precisely what you are using and thus the error. FWIW the zlib module is present, in 64 bit install (x86-64), at /usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/zlibmodule.so -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Tuesday 06 May 2014 01:44:25 Hugh Medal wrote: If I need to I can just move to Fedora 20 (I am currently using 19). Just let me know if I should do that. Thanks, Hugh There is no difference here between Fedora 19 and 20. -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Tuesday 06 May 2014 01:44:25 Hugh Medal wrote: If I need to I can just move to Fedora 20 (I am currently using 19). Just let me know if I should do that. Thanks, Hugh There is no difference here between Fedora 19 and 20. -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Tuesday 06 May 2014 01:44:25 Hugh Medal wrote: > If I need to I can just move to Fedora 20 (I am currently using 19). Just let > me know if I should do that. > > Thanks, > Hugh There is no difference here between Fedora 19 and 20. -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Friday 02 May 2014 17:23:05 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Wait a minute. This binary http://pkgs.org/fedora-19/fedora-updates-x86_64/lyx-2.1.0-0.fc19.x86_64.rpm.html looks incomplete to me. The file list has - /usr/bin/lyx - /usr/bin/lyxclient - /usr/bin/tex2lyx - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/ - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/ANNOUNCE - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/COPYING - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/CREDITS - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/NEWS - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/README There is a lot of stuff missing. Amonst others, lyx2lyx. This also seems to be the case for the 32bit version and LyX 2.0.6. This would explain your problems. José, could you please check? Jürgen That is OK. Besides lyx, there are two sub-packages: lyx-common and lyx-fonts. The later is self-descriptive and the former has all the non-arch parts of lyx. lyx2lyx, layouts and company are there. This scheme allows to have a shared sub-package for all the support architectures. Regards, -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Friday 02 May 2014 18:20:42 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Why are fonts separate? JMarc IIRC there is an interest from other packages to use lyx-fonts without necessarily having lyx installed: # repoquery --whatrequires lyx-fonts calligra-core-0:2.7.4-1.fc20.x86_64 calligra-core-0:2.8.1-1.fc20.x86_64 calligra-core-0:2.8.2-1.fc20.x86_64 gtkmathview-0:0.8.0-13.fc20.i686 gtkmathview-0:0.8.0-13.fc20.x86_64 libreoffice-langpack-br-1:4.1.3.2-9.fc20.x86_64 [... snip lots of other libreoffice-langpack's ...] lyx-0:2.0.6-3.fc20.x86_64 lyx-0:2.1.0-0.fc20.x86_64 vdr-0:2.0.4-1.fc20.x86_64 vdr-0:2.0.5-1.fc20.x86_64 wordnet-browser-0:3.0-20.fc20.x86_64 So all those packages require the fonts provided by lyx-fonts. I hope that this makes sense. :-) Regards, -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Friday 02 May 2014 18:33:45 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I doubt that. The document is rather simple, and Hugh wrote he cannot open any document. Oops, I did not read all the details. I am sorry for making wrong claims. :-) I suspected lyx2lyx fails for some reason (python problem?), that's why I looked at the rpm and check the path to lyx2lyx on Fedora, so that Hugh can check what happens if he runs lyx2lyx on the file manually. Jürgen It is weird indeed since lyx requires lyx-common so lyx2lyx should be available. Python is a central part of a Fedora installation, it is not possible to remove it and lyx2lyx only requires the standard library. -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Friday 02 May 2014 17:23:05 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Wait a minute. This binary http://pkgs.org/fedora-19/fedora-updates-x86_64/lyx-2.1.0-0.fc19.x86_64.rpm.html looks incomplete to me. The file list has - /usr/bin/lyx - /usr/bin/lyxclient - /usr/bin/tex2lyx - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/ - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/ANNOUNCE - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/COPYING - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/CREDITS - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/NEWS - /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/README There is a lot of stuff missing. Amonst others, lyx2lyx. This also seems to be the case for the 32bit version and LyX 2.0.6. This would explain your problems. José, could you please check? Jürgen That is OK. Besides lyx, there are two sub-packages: lyx-common and lyx-fonts. The later is self-descriptive and the former has all the non-arch parts of lyx. lyx2lyx, layouts and company are there. This scheme allows to have a shared sub-package for all the support architectures. Regards, -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Friday 02 May 2014 18:20:42 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Why are fonts separate? JMarc IIRC there is an interest from other packages to use lyx-fonts without necessarily having lyx installed: # repoquery --whatrequires lyx-fonts calligra-core-0:2.7.4-1.fc20.x86_64 calligra-core-0:2.8.1-1.fc20.x86_64 calligra-core-0:2.8.2-1.fc20.x86_64 gtkmathview-0:0.8.0-13.fc20.i686 gtkmathview-0:0.8.0-13.fc20.x86_64 libreoffice-langpack-br-1:4.1.3.2-9.fc20.x86_64 [... snip lots of other libreoffice-langpack's ...] lyx-0:2.0.6-3.fc20.x86_64 lyx-0:2.1.0-0.fc20.x86_64 vdr-0:2.0.4-1.fc20.x86_64 vdr-0:2.0.5-1.fc20.x86_64 wordnet-browser-0:3.0-20.fc20.x86_64 So all those packages require the fonts provided by lyx-fonts. I hope that this makes sense. :-) Regards, -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Friday 02 May 2014 18:33:45 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I doubt that. The document is rather simple, and Hugh wrote he cannot open any document. Oops, I did not read all the details. I am sorry for making wrong claims. :-) I suspected lyx2lyx fails for some reason (python problem?), that's why I looked at the rpm and check the path to lyx2lyx on Fedora, so that Hugh can check what happens if he runs lyx2lyx on the file manually. Jürgen It is weird indeed since lyx requires lyx-common so lyx2lyx should be available. Python is a central part of a Fedora installation, it is not possible to remove it and lyx2lyx only requires the standard library. -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Friday 02 May 2014 17:23:05 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Wait a minute. > > This binary > http://pkgs.org/fedora-19/fedora-updates-x86_64/lyx-2.1.0-0.fc19.x86_64.rpm.html > looks incomplete to me. > > The file list has > >- /usr/bin/lyx >- /usr/bin/lyxclient >- /usr/bin/tex2lyx >- /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/ >- /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/ANNOUNCE >- /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/COPYING >- /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/CREDITS >- /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/NEWS >- /usr/share/doc/lyx-2.1.0/README > > There is a lot of stuff missing. Amonst others, lyx2lyx. This also seems to > be the case for the 32bit version and LyX 2.0.6. > > This would explain your problems. > > José, could you please check? > > Jürgen That is OK. Besides lyx, there are two sub-packages: lyx-common and lyx-fonts. The later is self-descriptive and the former has all the non-arch parts of lyx. lyx2lyx, layouts and company are there. This scheme allows to have a shared sub-package for all the support architectures. Regards, -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Friday 02 May 2014 18:20:42 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Why are fonts separate? > > JMarc IIRC there is an interest from other packages to use lyx-fonts without necessarily having lyx installed: # repoquery --whatrequires lyx-fonts calligra-core-0:2.7.4-1.fc20.x86_64 calligra-core-0:2.8.1-1.fc20.x86_64 calligra-core-0:2.8.2-1.fc20.x86_64 gtkmathview-0:0.8.0-13.fc20.i686 gtkmathview-0:0.8.0-13.fc20.x86_64 libreoffice-langpack-br-1:4.1.3.2-9.fc20.x86_64 [... snip lots of other libreoffice-langpack's ...] lyx-0:2.0.6-3.fc20.x86_64 lyx-0:2.1.0-0.fc20.x86_64 vdr-0:2.0.4-1.fc20.x86_64 vdr-0:2.0.5-1.fc20.x86_64 wordnet-browser-0:3.0-20.fc20.x86_64 So all those packages require the fonts provided by lyx-fonts. I hope that this makes sense. :-) Regards, -- José Abílio
Re: Re: converting from LyX 2.0 to 2.1
On Friday 02 May 2014 18:33:45 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > I doubt that. The document is rather simple, and Hugh wrote he cannot open > any document. Oops, I did not read all the details. I am sorry for making wrong claims. :-) > I suspected lyx2lyx fails for some reason (python problem?), that's why I > looked at the rpm and check the path to lyx2lyx on Fedora, so that Hugh can > check what happens if he runs lyx2lyx on the file manually. > > Jürgen It is weird indeed since lyx requires lyx-common so lyx2lyx should be available. Python is a central part of a Fedora installation, it is not possible to remove it and lyx2lyx only requires the standard library. -- José Abílio
