Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-06-01 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
Geord, Scott and Kornel, thanks for the infos re uninstall! Wolfgang On 31.05.2016 23:05, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 16:09:26, schrieb Scott Kostyshak On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31,

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:05:59PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 16:09:26, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200,

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 16:09:26, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > >> > > >> How do I effectively remove the

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > >> > >> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) > >> side by side > > > > You're on Linux right? I'm

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: >> >> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) >> side by side > > You're on Linux right? I'm not sure of the best way to remove it. We > don't have an uninstall target

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
On 31.05.2016 11:35, Helge Hafting wrote: Den 31. mai 2016 10:50, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: I used ./configure --with-version-suffix=22 and make and #make install so probably neither one Wolfgang Removing rc1 is not necessary for correct operation of lyx 2.2.0 in this case. The rc1 lyx

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Helge Hafting
Den 31. mai 2016 10:50, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: I used ./configure --with-version-suffix=22 and make and #make install so probably neither one Wolfgang Removing rc1 is not necessary for correct operation of lyx 2.2.0 in this case. The rc1 lyx you compiled is named "lyx-22", and won't

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:50:38, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann > >> I compiled it from source > > With cmake or automake help? > > In case you used cmake, you could create a debian package. Installing and > > de-installing is easy in that case. > > > >

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
On 31.05.2016 10:27, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:15:32, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:15:32, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann > > On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > > > > On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: > >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann > >>

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? > Wolfgang > > No

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? > > > Wolfgang > > No they're

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? Wolfgang No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final 2.2.0 over rc1. Scott Thanks,

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

2016-05-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? > Wolfgang No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final 2.2.0 over rc1. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature