> The theoretical basis of zstd[2] seems more complicated than that of LZMA
Well, it's new, from 2013/14, but it's actually not complicated,
simpler and easier to understand and implement than arithmetic coding. In
simple terms it is 'bit back arithmetic coding'. Zstd, and I guess
LZFSE, ar
l...@zaktouni.fr wrote:
do you already have numbers, opinions and maybe a comparison in
reliability, speed, compression ratio etc. against the new zstd?
I have used unzcrash to test the ability of the zstd decoder to detect
corruption by itself (without a checksum), and the results are not goo
Hi Aruna,
l...@zaktouni.fr wrote:
do you already have numbers, opinions and maybe a comparison in
reliability, speed, compression ratio etc. against the new zstd?
Testing zstd is in my TODO list. My first impression is that it may
perhaps be well suited for the needs of Facebook, but after a
