> On May 27, 2016, at 08:39, Stephen Adolph wrote:
>
> I don't believe any fdd today supports the magnetic format of the tpdd. 'FM'
> vs 'MFM'.
>
> So, TPDD disks are readable only on TPDD drives for electromechanical
> reasons..
Tools like the Kryoflux record raw flux transitions, so the
I take that back, I guess catweasel supports both modulation formats..
On Friday, May 27, 2016, Stephen Adolph wrote:
> I don't believe any fdd today supports the magnetic format of the tpdd.
'FM' vs 'MFM'.
>
> So, TPDD disks are readable only on TPDD drives for electromechanical
reasons..
>
>
>
I don't believe any fdd today supports the magnetic format of the tpdd.
'FM' vs 'MFM'.
So, TPDD disks are readable only on TPDD drives for electromechanical
reasons..
Anyone have any thoughts on that?
On Friday, May 27, 2016, Brian White wrote:
> In the short term, until someone develops a mo
In the short term, until someone develops a more elegant way, maybe someone
with a Kryoflux or Catweasel can at least take a flux image.
Kind of overkill for probably less than 100kb of data, but at least it's
reproducable. Not really any differrent than .wavs of cassettes.
--
bkw
> On May 25, 2016, at 12:20, Gary Hammond wrote:
>
> I don’t have any TPDD boot/utility disks so would be keen to get a copy of a
> TPDD boot/utility disk. I am happy to pay for postage etc.
If I can make a copy of the disk then I'll be happy to help. Of course, I also
want to archive the dis
